ADVERTISEMENT

Pitt is the ONLY ACC team that controls their own destiny.

Looking at historical data is not helpful in these discussions. The massive TV $$ push to prop up the Big Ten and SEC brands is a recent phenomenon. They have been preferred conference for a while, but I mean this recent overt push at all costs.

Just last year, an undefeated Power Conference champion with a solid resume was left out of a 4 team CFP in favor of 1-loss teams with the correct logos. Look at basketball last year too, where the #4 ACC team (Pitt) was left out of a 68 team tournament. Both these scenarios would have been unheard of in years gone by, but the ACC is functionally no different than the MAC or Sun Belt. For both NCAAT and CFP, the discussion is how many Big Ten and SEC* teams can we jam into the event and cling to a tidy shred of credibility, then fill the field with scraps from the other conferences.

*in basketball only, Big 12 is lumped in with Big Ten/SEC for "jam as many teams as possible" because of their recent big money tv deals in hoops. I suspect this may be temporary for a few years as they will likely get downgraded in their next hoops contract.
I think it’s more about being Alabama and Texas than conference affiliation. What do the networks gain subbing, say Mizzou for Florida State?

Pitt #6 in the country in the Colley Ranking

Pitt remains #6 with three top 50 wins, though no top 25 wins.

1.​
Oregon 0.960443
8-0​
0.575554: 24
3​
3​
W: #7 Ohio St
2.​
Penn St 0.912059
7-0​
0.529790: 60
1​
3​
W: #21 Illinois
3.​
BYU 0.892056
8-0​
0.490070: 85
2​
2​
W: #11 Kansas St
4.​
Iowa St 0.886181
7-0​
0.496519: 82
0​
2​
W: #42 Iowa
5.​
Miami (FL) 0.884494
8-0​
0.480617: 89
0​
3​
W: #31 Louisville
6.​
Pittsburgh 0.872098
7-0​
0.478412: 91
0​
3​
W: #29 Syracuse
7.​
Ohio St 0.862803
6-1​
0.609318: 12
0​
3​
W: #40 Nebraska
8.​
Notre Dame 0.853078
7-1​
0.566348: 29
1​
3​
W: #9 Texas A&M
9.​
Texas A&M 0.852516
7-1​
0.565645: 30
2​
4​
W: #20 LSU
10.​
Texas 0.842464
7-1​
0.553080: 42
0​
2​
W: #28 Michigan
11.​
Kansas St 0.838594
7-1​
0.548242: 45
1​
3​
W: #23 Colorado
12.​
Indiana 0.838484
8-0​
0.423105: 121
0​
1​
W: #40 Nebraska
13.​
Alabama 0.828896
6-2​
0.661120: 3
2​
5​
W: #15 Georgia
14.​
Boise St 0.811397
6-1​
0.543224: 49
1​
3​
W: #17 Washington St
15.​
Georgia 0.810714
6-1​
0.542346: 50
2​
2​
W: #10 Texas
16.​
SMU 0.810081
7-1​
0.512602: 70
0​
2​
W: #31 Louisville
17.​
Washington St 0.793000
7-1​
0.491251: 84
0​
1​
W: #39 Texas Tech
18.​
Clemson 0.790116
6-1​
0.515864: 68
0​
0​
W: #68 Virginia
19.​
Tennessee 0.777279
6-1​
0.499358: 80
1​
2​
W: #13 Alabama
20.​
LSU 0.751733
6-2​
0.564667: 32
0​
3​
W: #27 Mississippi

Pitt is the ONLY ACC team that controls their own destiny.

Looking at historical data is not helpful in these discussions. The massive TV $$ push to prop up the Big Ten and SEC brands is a recent phenomenon. They have been preferred conference for a while, but I mean this recent overt push at all costs.

Just last year, an undefeated Power Conference champion with a solid resume was left out of a 4 team CFP in favor of 1-loss teams with the correct logos. Look at basketball last year too, where the #4 ACC team (Pitt) was left out of a 68 team tournament. Both these scenarios would have been unheard of in years gone by, but the ACC is functionally no different than the MAC or Sun Belt. For both NCAAT and CFP, the discussion is how many Big Ten and SEC* teams can we jam into the event and cling to a tidy shred of credibility, then fill the field with scraps from the other conferences.

*in basketball only, Big 12 is lumped in with Big Ten/SEC for "jam as many teams as possible" because of their recent big money tv deals in hoops. I suspect this may be temporary for a few years as they will likely get downgraded in their next hoops contract.

Pitt is the ONLY ACC team that controls their own destiny.

Auburn missed out on it in 2004. USC and Oklahoma went undefeated and played for it.
You're right. I guess the FSU was only the first to miss a four team playoff, not the 2 team BCS arrangement. And obviously what were group of five teams were basically always denied access before, it was a de facto though not de jure two tier system.

Ranked teams who are overrated

Also it’s wrong as it relates to the ACC.

According to SP+ Miami has played 3 Top 25 teams this year. The rest of their schedule will hurt them. But it’s been pretty respectable up to this point.

The Big 12 is right at least as it relates to teams played.
Iowa State has played one Top 25 team (Big Ten Iowa) and plays one more the rest of the season (Big 12 Kansas State).

Kansas State hasn’t played any. Although BYU just missed the Top 25. But K State lost to them.
But Kansas State, Ole Miss, Missouri were ranked preseason so they have an unfair advantage over the likes of the unranked. A false perception.

Pitt is the ONLY ACC team that controls their own destiny.

Right, it took like 25 years for a power conference team to go undefeated and miss out on the BCS/CFP (FSU last year of course) but it did eventually happen. I think this "undefeated but out of the title game" will happen too but football teams might get decoupled from conferences or join a semi pro league outside (or inside but separate) in the NCAA first. That variable is very unpredictable, I just don't think the current conference situation is at all sustainable.

Auburn missed out on it in 2004. USC and Oklahoma went undefeated and played for it.
  • Like
Reactions: Mufasa94

Pitt’s new on campus football stadium

Did you actually go to Pitt Stadium as an adult? If so, where did you park?
And the Rooneys controlled the whole thing. Nutting has little influence if any.
Yes, and never had an issue with parking, traffic…or any of the other yinzer bugaboos. That’s all the opposing static is about…yinzer bugaboos….all of which will be irrelevant and ignored. Rooney won’t be controlling anything in the future.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT