***Pitt vs. Wisconsin game thread***
- By PittPoker
- Center Court at the Pete
- 693 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Oh I get it believe me. With that history it’s very hard to argue against it. And unless there’s some major money people coming forward it’s not gonna change.
Ryla’s been such a welcome addition this year.Kelley and Jones combined for 18 attempts, 14 kills and 0 errors. .778 hitting percentage between the two.
More horse manure from the Penn st site.That's the ceiling for the Pitt program, outside of the 10 win season once every 40 years.
Oh I get it believe me. With that history it’s very hard to argue against it. And unless there’s some major money people coming forward it’s not gonna change.That's the ceiling for the Pitt program, outside of the 10 win season once every 40 years.
There is the flipside…I don’t blame posters for getting it off their chest. After a day or two, you need clarity. What separates posters on this board is how long do they continue to rant and be irrational.Lol, where to even begin with this.
1. Stability - this is an adjective people use when there really isn't anything all that appealing to say about a coach. It's like a realtor saying a house has potential. Everybody knows what you're saying. Who cares about stability? I want results. Narduzzi was 8-4 and 8-4 in history first two seasons here. In his most two recent he'll be 3-9 and 7-5. Tell me more about this "stability." If anything it's time to experience the recruiting bump that comes with bringing in a new coach.
2. What a sanctimonious take to act like we couldn't do any better with anyone else. Like, that's borderline insane. You'd have told me Syracuse couldn't do any better than Dino Babers if you were a fan of them. Nope, after Dino averaging 5 wins for 8 years, they're going to win 8 or 9 this season. You'd have told me Kansas couldn't make a bowl again before Leipold got there. You'd have told me there's no way 1-11 Colorado could go 8-3 in year two of a new coach's tenure. Do you want 1,000 more examples? Ever hear of a school called Indiana?
Guess what we're also proving? Stability doesn't mean a damn thing. Ask Wake Forest how they're enjoying years 10 and 11 of Dave Clawson.
To say that people don't understand that Narduzzi is the best we can do... get out of here with that defeatist nonsense.
Stability = how long anyone keeps you around. He’s certainly stabilized that Pitt is a 6-6 to 8-4 type of program with an occasional outlier though.
blah, blah, blah pure horse manure. Spoken like a PSU troll.If you want to talk results, Pitt isn't going to get any better results than they have already gotten under Narduzzi. Doesn't matter if the coach is Narduzzi or someone else. That isn't defeatist. It's reality.
Most coaching changes are good to clear the air and feed some grass to the sheep. There really isn't that much substance behind them unless it relates to a procurement of talent. And 4 or 5 years ago, it mattered. Today it really doesn't. Indiana got their bump because Cigs was able to bring over an ungodly number of upperclassmen & IU's schedule was ass. Next year, the Hoosiers will go right back to being irrelevant.
They can keep Narduzzi, fire Narduzzi, whatever... Success isn't really possible or sustainable without getting high end talent. Can't be done.
It stopped streaming on the UCF vs LSU spot so I went to the PIT vs WIS spot. It WAS airing there and then stopped. I found it again. CBS Sports is not the best app. I keep having to sign in each time I want to watch (I have YouTubeTV)I don't know why that would have happened to you, but CBSSN is still showing the LSU-UCF game.