ADVERTISEMENT

2023 Pitt Schedule

TheSpecialSauce

Chancellor
Gold Member
Nov 15, 2019
20,936
29,582
113
The Pirates are away Sept 2, 9, and we play at WV on the 16th. They are away on 9/23 and home on 9/30. The only possible conflict would be on 9/30 next season.

9/2 - Lower Level School at Home
9/9 - Cincy at Home
9/16 - at WV
TBA - at ND
 
Conference Opponents - Easier than Usual
If ND was at home, then it would be just about right. It isn’t ideal to only play 6 home games.
at Duke
at SU
at WF
at VT
UNC
FSU
L’Ville
BC
 
That is setting up for a classic Pitt year where we go 6-2 in conference and just 8-5 overall. 2-2 in the non-con and then regardless of which bowl we are in, Narduzzi treats it like a spring game as usual and we lose.
 
Two out of the three toughest games are on the road. What does that do for attendance??
it's a home and home. we have both teams at home one year, and away the other. that's how home and homes work. we play wvu home in a week, we have to repay them with a visit. same with cincy. We arent in a position to pay a D1 school like cincy to come here only..

The only option would be to have 2 fcs exhibitions in the same year and if we did that, we'd be the laughing stock of college football with that cake schedule. The trip to South Bend isnt great but thats due to the ND-ACC weird ass scheduling agreement. blame the ACC for bending over for that one, not pitt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pittnerski
Conference Opponents - Easier than Usual
If ND was at home, then it would be just about right. It isn’t ideal to only play 6 home games.
at Duke
at SU
at WF
at VT
UNC
FSU
L’Ville
BC
the only issue here is the ND scheduling agreement, that creates an imbalance. hey, i agree, it kind of stinks but on the flip side, you do get a visit from them in '25 i think. what's the other option? Tell ACC to NOT schedule notre dame on your schedule? that isnt happening.

Its either that or schedule 2 fcs scrimmages in one year and NO ONE wants that nonsense..

The '24 format is pretty much what i imagine Pitt is trying for every year. 2 P5 games OOC, one home and one away. your scrimmage against an FCS Team and a game against bad mac team at home. that gets you 10 P5 opponents and 7 home games.

the only time you cant do that is when notre dame rotation comes up. reason #124 to dislike notre dame.
 
Last edited:
What other games are juggernauts that Sept 9? Assuming the usual pre-conference dreck for the elite programs that early… why not a second straight year of Gameday at The ‘Sure? Backyard Brawl renewal in 2022; River City Re-Vivalry Under The Lights in 2023!
 
They know ND schedule in advance. Adding wvu on that rotation guaranteed 6 away games.
 
Next year is a transitional year regardless of who we play. We'll be replacing our entire offensive line, 3/4 of our starting defensive line, possibly our quarterback, a number of receivers can declare pro (Mumpfield, Means, Barden, Wayne... not saying they would all get drafted, but sometimes you just get to the "now or never" point nonetheless), possibly Izzy, potentially some secondary guys, etc.

I'm not saying we don't have capable guys behind them (e.g. Baer-Zubovic/Jacoby-Moore-Goncalves/Kradel-Taylor sounds decent), but there's still something to be said about A) Having so many first-year starters and B) Finding new depth behind those guys.

I think the analysts got it wrong about this being our "fall back into the pack" season, but the next one could be. It might look a lot like 2017.
 
Next year is a transitional year regardless of who we play. We'll be replacing our entire offensive line, 3/4 of our starting defensive line, possibly our quarterback, a number of receivers can declare pro (Mumpfield, Means, Barden, Wayne... not saying they would all get drafted, but sometimes you just get to the "now or never" point nonetheless), possibly Izzy, potentially some secondary guys, etc.

I'm not saying we don't have capable guys behind them (e.g. Baer-Zubovic/Jacoby-Moore-Goncalves/Kradel-Taylor sounds decent), but there's still something to be said about A) Having so many first-year starters and B) Finding new depth behind those guys.

I think the analysts got it wrong about this being our "fall back into the pack" season, but the next one could be. It might look a lot like 2017.
I think our fall back to the pack will be 7-5/8-4 type seasons in the future. Hopefully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kma0043 and BPKY
Treat the ND game like an ACC game in your mind and its not that bad. we dont have Clemson, NC State or Miami on the schedule. The ND game likely will be later in the year, not in the first four like other OOC games.

Will Cincy be top 25 next year? Doubtful. Will WV? Doubtful

Its possible that ND is the only ranked team we play next year and folks are getting their panties in a twist of our killer schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeldas Open Roof
They know ND schedule in advance. Adding wvu on that rotation guaranteed 6 away games.
so they should have said no to the backyard brawl and instead paid new hampshire to come here?

Thank the lord you guys arent in charge of the schedule.
 
so they should have said no to the backyard brawl and instead paid new hampshire to come here?

Thank the lord you guys arent in charge of the schedule.

That's what chaps my keyster when people get mad about the 2018 schedule. ND is already built into the schedule. UCF... I mean, that was a fluke as much as anything. Not sure when we agreed to that series, but they were 0-12 in 2015. And then were we supposed to not play Penn State? That generated as much fan interest as any series since the 80's.
 
That's what chaps my keyster when people get mad about the 2018 schedule. ND is already built into the schedule. UCF... I mean, that was a fluke as much as anything. Not sure when we agreed to that series, but they were 0-12 in 2015. And then were we supposed to not play Penn State? That generated as much fan interest as any series since the 80's.
there are pitt fans that would rather play fcs scrimmages in front of 14k fans than an actual P5 team to get a better record. it's weird and quite pathetic actually. like someone else said, we'll likely have one team in the top 25 and we are crying about our tough schedule lol.

Could you imagine an SEC fan look at our schedule and see us talking about how tough it is when their team will likely play 4-5 teams in the top 25? They'd just laugh and shake their head.
 
there are pitt fans that would rather play fcs scrimmages in front of 14k fans than an actual P5 team to get a better record. it's weird and quite pathetic actually. like someone else said, we'll likely have one team in the top 25 and we are crying about our tough schedule lol.

Could you imagine an SEC fan look at our schedule and see us talking about how tough it is when their team will likely play 4-5 teams in the top 25? They'd just laugh and shake their head.

I agree that's how it should be. But I'd like to see it standardized: You can't play FCS teams, and you get one game against a G5 team. That's it.
 
That is setting up for a classic Pitt year where we go 6-2 in conference and just 8-5 overall. 2-2 in the non-con and then regardless of which bowl we are in, Narduzzi treats it like a spring game as usual and we lose.
Were u able to enjoy last year? Smh
 
I didn’t enjoy the $5k I spent on a Peach bowl trip to watch us look feeble on offense all night. Actually , I did enjoy the trip , just not our play that day.
Maybe some past Bowl losses are on on the coach for not treating it sufficiently. But for the Peach loss… blame the “system” on that, not the coach. The system for a sport that purports to be a serious enterprise, but that inexplicably is fine with players randomly blowing off post-season games, for which they were given scholarships to participate in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kma0043
Maybe some past Bowl losses are on on the coach for not treating it sufficiently. But for the Peach loss… blame the “system” on that, not the coach. The system for a sport that purports to be a serious enterprise, but that inexplicably is fine with players randomly blowing off post-season games, for which they were given scholarships to participate in.
bowl games are becoming less and less meaningful by the year. the coaches and players dont even take these games that serious anymore. I like them cause it's more football but you just cant take them that serious. i almost consider them more of a prelude to the upcoming season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FallingRun84
Maybe some past Bowl losses are on on the coach for not treating it sufficiently. But for the Peach loss… blame the “system” on that, not the coach. The system for a sport that purports to be a serious enterprise, but that inexplicably is fine with players randomly blowing off post-season games, for which they were given scholarships to participate in.

Yeah, I think Narduzzi wanted to win that as much as anybody. If he didn't, he wouldn't be making snarky comments about it eight months later.
 
As you will see this year you will see in 2023 that Pitt is a very talented college football team

This roster is not at a one very good year then back to 8-4/7-5 level
 
As you will see this year you will see in 2023 that Pitt is a very talented college football team

This roster is not at a one very good year then back to 8-4/7-5 level

Eh, I don't think so. 7-5 would be a good season for 2023.

Look at 2019: We had Pickett on offense and a defense that was littered with All-Americans and AA candidates, and we went 7-5.

In 2020, we went 6-5 (6-3 with Pickett) with a team that included two AA defensive ends, Addison, Cancey, Hamlin, Mathis and Pinnock, etc.

It's not as easy to go 9-3 or better as you're making it seem. We have a good program, but we simply don't recruit well enough for that to be our normal season. Doing it once doesn't all of a sudden buck that trend.

I fully expect to be around 9-3 this year, but then we have to replace quite a bit. And there will be some lumps along the way.
 
OT: this probably means that the Steelers will have a home game for the season opener for the first time in probably 6-7 year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittdan77
As you will see this year you will see in 2023 that Pitt is a very talented college football team

This roster is not at a one very good year then back to 8-4/7-5 level
With the transfer portal, and our success with it, i am confident we wont have a "2017-like" year, even when losing 5-6 OL, kancey, Habo, Alexandre, Dennis, Hill, Morgan, Hallett, Williams... Damn, you know what, i started out posting this to make a point but literally changed my mind in mid sentence.

We are losing a freakin ton of players.
 
It's not about who you lose, but who you have. Some possible starters:
DBs: Woods/devonshire/Obrien/Mcintyre
LB: Kamara/George/Simon
DL: Hayes/Donald/Bently/Morgan* *I know Morgan plans to go pro, but not 100%. If so, then Brima or Johnson here
WRs - Mumpfield, Bradley or Means, and Barden
RB: Izzy* *Some chance he goes pro, then Hammond here
TE: Bartholomew
OL: Baer/Jacoby/Moore/Zubvic/Taylor/Goncalves
QB: Slovis* *even with a good year this year, he could come back a la Kenny and really improve his stock

A lot will change by then, but that starting lineup is 9-3 with Slovis and 8-4 with Patti (sorry Nick). I 'd stick with those numbers even if Morgan and Izzy go too. Our DL is deep still and Hammond will be a good #1.
 
It's not about who you lose, but who you have. Some possible starters:
DBs: Woods/devonshire/Obrien/Mcintyre
LB: Kamara/George/Simon
DL: Hayes/Donald/Bently/Morgan* *I know Morgan plans to go pro, but not 100%. If so, then Brima or Johnson here
WRs - Mumpfield, Bradley or Means, and Barden
RB: Izzy* *Some chance he goes pro, then Hammond here
TE: Bartholomew
OL: Baer/Jacoby/Moore/Zubvic/Taylor/Goncalves
QB: Slovis* *even with a good year this year, he could come back a la Kenny and really improve his stock

A lot will change by then, but that starting lineup is 9-3 with Slovis and 8-4 with Patti (sorry Nick). I 'd stick with those numbers even if Morgan and Izzy go too. Our DL is deep still and Hammond will be a good #1.

Man I'd love to be some of you guys' bookie. Winning 9+ games is tough. Narduzzi is doing it at a 14% clip... without having to replace 15+ starters most years.

It's totally fine for a program like ours to go 6-6 every now and then. It takes guys time to get acclimated to starting at this level. Also, there are a lot more guys form above who may leave. If Mumpfield has a huge year he's gone, for instance.

2023 QB battle will be interesting. It could literally be Slovis, Patti, Minchey, or Yarnell right now.
 
While I just listed starter from our existing player pool, I think you are overlooking the impact of the transfer portal. For once, Pitt caught something right in that we had a good season at the right time. Sure we lost Addison and Bright, but we gained Slovis, Mumpfied, Simon, Means, Wilitz, Flemister... If we have another good season this year, even say 9-3 with multiple NFL picks, we will be very attractive option for some transfers again next year too help plug some holes.

It is going to be tougher than ever for .500 or below teams to build up because they will lose good players to better teams every year. On the flip side, it will be somewhat easier for 8/9/10 win teams to stay there because people will want to play for them. We will not get the top transfers like USC and Alabama get, but we will get some very good players still just like Slovis, Mumpfield, and Co.
 
It's not about who you lose, but who you have. Some possible starters:
DBs: Woods/devonshire/Obrien/Mcintyre
LB: Kamara/George/Simon
DL: Hayes/Donald/Bently/Morgan* *I know Morgan plans to go pro, but not 100%. If so, then Brima or Johnson here
WRs - Mumpfield, Bradley or Means, and Barden
RB: Izzy* *Some chance he goes pro, then Hammond here
TE: Bartholomew
OL: Baer/Jacoby/Moore/Zubvic/Taylor/Goncalves
QB: Slovis* *even with a good year this year, he could come back a la Kenny and really improve his stock

A lot will change by then, but that starting lineup is 9-3 with Slovis and 8-4 with Patti (sorry Nick). I 'd stick with those numbers even if Morgan and Izzy go too. Our DL is deep still and Hammond will be a good #1.
Kradel could return too. All specialists return as well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT