BC 8/18
Pitt 4/18
Maybe not as one sided as I thought watching the game, but I was thinking this was going to be a difference. Did anyone else feel that BC was more likely to convert a 3rd and long than Pitt was a 3rd and short? From skimming the plays - BC converted on 3rd and... 6, 10, 9, 12, 7, and... fittingly... the game winner on 3rd and 10. So yeah, most of those 8 were basically “long”.
Pitt 4/18
Maybe not as one sided as I thought watching the game, but I was thinking this was going to be a difference. Did anyone else feel that BC was more likely to convert a 3rd and long than Pitt was a 3rd and short? From skimming the plays - BC converted on 3rd and... 6, 10, 9, 12, 7, and... fittingly... the game winner on 3rd and 10. So yeah, most of those 8 were basically “long”.