ADVERTISEMENT

AKC — St Bona

Kind of wow. Bonnies are so methodical in their offense. Immediate reaction is I have a hard time seeing AKC fitting in there but who knows.
 
Good luck to Karim; the Olean winter may be a bit of an adjustment for him
 
  • Like
Reactions: TWPitt
"Defensive standout" made me chuckle. Also, it's kind of depressing to see some pretty good programs on his list... because he's not a very good ACC player. Kind of makes me skeptical when assessing some others in the portal. Yeah, they might have some decent offers, but they might be viewed as a mere depth piece to those schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cavalier Panther
"Defensive standout" made me chuckle. Also, it's kind of depressing to see some pretty good programs on his list... because he's not a very good ACC player. Kind of makes me skeptical when assessing some others in the portal. Yeah, they might have some decent offers, but they might be viewed as a mere depth piece to those schools.


But of course the thing that you never know about these sorts of things is that, for instance, Georgetown is the first school on the "over" list. And I'm not suggesting that he didn't have contact with any of those schools. But did he have a real, commitable offer from Georgetown? Certainly none of us knows for sure, and it's almost certain that Andrew Slater doesn't either. He almost certainly got that information from Coulibaly or someone in his camp. He almost certainly did not hear that from anyone actually at Georgetown in a position to know if Georgetown actually wanted him, because why would someone from Georgetown tell him "oh, yeah, we offered him a scholarship and we really wanted Coulibaly and he picked someone else"? From their (Georgetown's) point of view telling him that would be stupid.

I'm not saying that Georgetown or anyone else on that list didn't really want him, I'm just saying that consider the likely source of that information and the bias that that likely source has.
 
But of course the thing that you never know about these sorts of things is that, for instance, Georgetown is the first school on the "over" list. And I'm not suggesting that he didn't have contact with any of those schools. But did he have a real, commitable offer from Georgetown? Certainly none of us knows for sure, and it's almost certain that Andrew Slater doesn't either. He almost certainly got that information from Coulibaly or someone in his camp. He almost certainly did not hear that from anyone actually at Georgetown in a position to know if Georgetown actually wanted him, because why would someone from Georgetown tell him "oh, yeah, we offered him a scholarship and we really wanted Coulibaly and he picked someone else"? From their (Georgetown's) point of view telling him that would be stupid.

I'm not saying that Georgetown or anyone else on that list didn't really want him, I'm just saying that consider the likely source of that information and the bias that that likely source has.

For sure, which makes it much alike recruiting guys out of high school (we don't know which offers are committable, who is prioritized, etc.). On the other hand, it's all us outsiders really have to go by. If I see that Kansas reached out to someone, I'll be a lot more encouraged than if Hofstra reached out to them. Even if "reached out to" leaves a lot of room for interpretation.
 
"Defensive standout" made me chuckle. Also, it's kind of depressing to see some pretty good programs on his list... because he's not a very good ACC player. Kind of makes me skeptical when assessing some others in the portal. Yeah, they might have some decent offers, but they might be viewed as a mere depth piece to those schools.

He can play for a lot of programs as a backup. He is a nice ACC level reserve. If he's starting then your team has no chance.

A10 is a great level for him. He'll average 8 PPG and 5 RPG and everyone will be happy
 
Maybe they just mean he sucked so bad that it stood out.

He was so bad defensively. He made NC State's bigs look like Shaq. I was actually embarrassed for him in that game. He was also just about as bad a rebounder as 5 can be. That said, he was one of the best 5's we've had since McGhee which is super pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GlennEM
Guessing he didn't want to continue to be a 5; and StB has as very good and very big 5 (Osun...ami); on the Mali nat'l team AKC played around the perimeter; bet HCMS told that's where he'll play at SB
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MajorMajors
Bonnies return their entire
starting five for next season.
They were league champions.
and tourney champs. Lost in
first round of NCAA's.
Their center was A-10 defensive
player of the year, and second
team all league. He also was one
of the leading shot blockers in
the country.

The back up Center transfered out.
So AKC will be a backup. Bottom
line.....he goes from starting at an
ACC team to backup status at an
A-10 team. Coach Schmidt is known
to develop players. Maybe AKC starts
as a senior, but no way next year, at
least not as their center. They needed
a backup.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jeffburgh
Coulibaly’s game is nothing if not very methodical. I think he’ll do really well in the A10, to be honest.

He truly made a great decision for himself IMO. I think this ends up being a good experience for him, other than not getting a bigger name on the degree.
 
Schmidt will make him a better player than Capel would have and he will get floor time/be able to develop at proper speed. I like him at the ACC level as a developmental guy and rotation contributor but this is where he fit perfectly all along if he is going to have a long basketball career after college. This is a great move for him.

I wish him the best, he seemed like a good kid.
 
Schmidt will make him a better player than Capel would have and he will get floor time/be able to develop at proper speed. I like him at the ACC level as a developmental guy and rotation contributor but this is where he fit perfectly all along if he is going to have a long basketball career after college. This is a great move for him.

I wish him the best, he seemed like a good kid.
How can anyone know whether a player will develop better under one coach than under another? Whatever he does at St. B, we will never know what he would have done at Pitt.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FireballZ
I cannot imagine how anyone who has watched him play could think that him playing the four on anything beyond an emergency situation is even a remote possibility.
I think he will be a fine 4 in time. He does not jump well, but he moves fine laterally. He has some length. He plays hard, has some skill.

How can anyone know whether a player will develop better under one coach than under another? Whatever he does at St. B, we will never know what he would have done at Pitt.
Because some coaches develop players better than other coaches. It separates quality much of the time. Capel has little track record of positive player development over time and Schmidt has a much better one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WannyandWalt
I think he will be a fine 4 in time. He does not jump well, but he moves fine laterally. He has some length. He plays hard, has some skill.


Because some coaches develop players better than other coaches. It separates quality much of the time. Capel has little track record of positive player development over time and Schmidt has a much better one.
How do you know what any coach would have done with the players that another had - that is my point. There are 2 elements to this process - the coach and the player. Some players develop and others do not - you can never know how a player would have developed with another coach, since they will never have that opportunity.
 
How do you know what any coach would have done with the players that another had - that is my point. There are 2 elements to this process - the coach and the player. Some players develop and others do not - you can never know how a player would have developed with another coach, since they will never have that opportunity.

Capel is the bestest coach ever!
 
How do you know what any coach would have done with the players that another had - that is my point. There are 2 elements to this process - the coach and the player. Some players develop and others do not - you can never know how a player would have developed with another coach, since they will never have that opportunity.

You're right, but here's
one way to tell about
Schmidt's ability to develop
players.
His center Osun Osannayi had
three offers, Bonnies, LaSalle,
and a very late offer from Syracuse.
He was a two star recruit. He just
finished his Jr, year and was named
defensive player of the year, and
2nd team All conference in the A-10.

Kyle Lofton, also a jr was a two
star. He had offers from U Mass
and Bonnies. He was just named
1st team All League in the A-10.
Both of these would start at
Pitt. Osun is light years ahead
of any of our bigs we've seen
the past three years. Schmidts
other players are a mixture of
JC and transfer types. He wins
with two star recruits which he
very clearly develops. BTW, he
was once again named coach
of the year in the A-10.

These examples are typical of
what Schmidt has done over
the years. Worth mentioning
is the difficulty to recruit to
Olean, N.Y, a rural freezing
snow land in the middle of
no where.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gary2
You are absolutely right, he did a very nice job with those players. My contention, though, is that we have little ability to judge him versus other coaches, when those coaches all have coached different players. For instance, what would Capel down with those same players - we will never know.
 
You are absolutely right, he did a very nice job with those players. My contention, though, is that we have little ability to judge him versus other coaches, when those coaches all have coached different players. For instance, what would Capel down with those same players - we will never know.
Know? No, we will never “know”.

Based on his developmental history, we can make a pretty safe guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WannyandWalt
You are absolutely right, he did a very nice job with those players. My contention, though, is that we have little ability to judge him versus other coaches, when those coaches all have coached different players. For instance, what would Capel down with those same players - we will never know.

Yes, and as you saw, my original
post agreed with yours. I 'm not
suggesting that Schmidt would
have develped Pitt's players better
than Capel. It's just that it's known
in college circles that he takes
little known players and makes
All Stars out of some of them.
Not all of them, but some. I'm
not suggesting he'd do a better
at Pitt than Capel is doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franb
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT