ADVERTISEMENT

Another UPDATE ...

DT_PITT

Lair Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Jul 17, 2001
46,244
33,951
113
... in referring to my three options in my previous post, someone I really trust just texted me and said that it's NOT the first of three options.

So before, I said I put a 75% chance on that being who it would be.

Now I'd say it's 44% on choice #1, 47% on choice #2, and 9% on choice #3.
 
I had no idea I need to take the LSAT in order to decipher the posts. Tell me DT, if choice #2 does not smoke and choice #1 has a fish, then who lives in the red house?
 
... in referring to my three options in my previous post, someone I really trust just texted me and said that it's NOT the first of three options.

So before, I said I put a 75% chance on that being who it would be.

Now I'd say it's 44% on choice #1, 47% on choice #2, and 9% on choice #3.
Who are they? It's not like we know who the source is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
... in referring to my three options in my previous post, someone I really trust just texted me and said that it's NOT the first of three options.

So before, I said I put a 75% chance on that being who it would be.

Now I'd say it's 44% on choice #1, 47% on choice #2, and 9% on choice #3.
Not helpful DT. Why post this.
 
... in referring to my three options in my previous post, someone I really trust just texted me and said that it's NOT the first of three options.

So before, I said I put a 75% chance on that being who it would be.

Now I'd say it's 44% on choice #1, 47% on choice #2, and 9% on choice #3.
Can someone please decipher this with names? Thanks.
 
My source confirmed that Pitt has (with 73% certainty) received a silent verbal commitment from "a coach".....they also said this was the 2nd choice, as the first choice had been hired and then fired almost immediately an hour later....strange times we are in folks.....
 
I'm back to thinking #1 was right all along. It was Stallings. I've heard Enfield turned us down.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT