ADVERTISEMENT

Breaking...the fun is just about to reopen again

Victim #2 is expected to say that investigators pressured him to implicate Sandusky after he initially told them that nothing improper took place when he and Sandusky were in the locker room shower, according to court papers filed by Alexander Lindsay, the lawyer handling Sandusky's post-conviction appeals.

Victim #2 never testified in Sandusky's trial because prosecutors concluded that his story had too many holes.
 
"Victim #2 never testified in Sandusky's trial because prosecutors concluded that his story had too many holes"
might want to reword that last sentence there Kev...when you get more than two posts on this board (what, do you lie in wait?) you will pick up on these things...
 
  • Like
Reactions: big marty
Yeah I know, I railed against 25 threads of the same PSU stuff. But this is new and it is breaking.

So I might as well be the first.

http://www.aol.com/article/news/201...tify-retrial/21598771/?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter
Not a problem at all and welcomed as far as I am concern, I always advocated that the PAOAG did a sloppy investigation and welcomed the Civil Lawsuits too, so everything comes out! It has been noted that the Penn State Three Defense Teams are far more better than PAOAG in my opinion, and have done a great job in defending their Clients as they should.

Posted many times, let the Courts find the answers and everyone is entitled to defend their Constitutional Rights and Discovery will be decided by Judges and Verdicts and Awards by Juries, and then the Court of Public Opinion by Media and Public.

Now Victim #2 can testify and Al Lindsey in my Opinion should have a New Trial. Because the first one like many on Political Inspired Bonus-Gate Prosecutions by Frank Fina for Tom Corbett and had many unfair flaws and all. Not a problem in that being revisited as other Fina Prosecutions are on Appeal right now as well.

The Prosecution will also have a chance to bring forth other Victims. I leave that to the Judge and Appeal Lawyers to do their Jobs! The Judge will take his time on making his rulings as well as much as a year. If a New Trial is granted I expect Matt Sandusky will testify as well and let him be Cross Examined.

My Posts were on the Penn State Scandal bringing about proper investigations by the Trustees on Athletic Integrity Findings & 2012 Athletic Integrity Reforms have been vindicated just yesterday by the release of the Clery Act Findings $2.4 Million proposed Fines that can be renegotiated down as usual practice in dealing with that act.

The D.O.E. and DOJ care more about setting up Compliance Reforms and Penn State did that better than any University in History.

Additionally, Penn State also implemented 116 of 119 Freeh Recommendations Reforms, adopted by a compliant Penn State Trustees and President under a NCAA Sanction On Campus Monitor and recommended to reduce Sanctions Years by 2 years. The NCAA Sanctions still stood in place for those 2 years, and the Big Ten Bowl Sharing Sanctions Revenues too for 4 years.

Nevertheless, Penn State University did make mistakes in filing Lawsuits against its Insurance Carrier that did reveal allegations dating back to 1970s-80s, and that will impact on the Sandusky Appeal as well. Unsealed Documents all will come out sooner later.

Moreover, Penn State Insurance Carrier AIG made an error as I posted by choosing to go to Trial over McQueary Defamation, Dismissal, and Whistleblowing, instead of of a settlement.

As well as, Pennsylvania Lawmakers with Penn State Alumni & some Trustees were right to also challenge the NCAA $60 Million Fine that the NCAA wanted to take away. The Lawmakers were correct to keep that money in Pennsylvania and revised the Consent Decree. It resulted in keeping sanctions in place for 2 years, but also reducing sanctions by 2 years, and restored Paterno Great Coaching Wins that I admired as well even being attacked on the Lair in posting it to agree to disagree many times.

What has not change and will not change are the Penn State University 2102 Reforms.

The Penn State University Football Program Athletic 2012 Reforms are in place and will stay in place. Penn State now has a Director of Ethics & Compliance, overseeing Athletic Integrity Agreement & Officer, Title IX & Clery Act Procedures & Reporting, Policies on Undisclosed Conflicts of Interests For Trustees and Coaches, Coaches, Employee, and Student Children Protection Orientation, and Criminal Background Checks on contributors to the University by not approving any monies they so choose to reject.

These 2012 Reforms are commendable and being adopted as a Model of Athletic Compliance and deserve to respected and recognized y never having One Person, Employees, or Coach to ever come ahead of Penn State University again just due to Wins.

The Court Cases Criminal Trials, Civil Lawsuits, and Appeals should be played out before Judges & Juries so all know what happen and how, and always advocated that knowing that process is far fairer and every person has their constitutional rights to be cherished and used properly, and day in court too if they feel they were wrongs.

Being fair is never a Vice!
 
Last edited:
"Victim #2 never testified in Sandusky's trial because prosecutors concluded that his story had too many holes"
might want to reword that last sentence there Kev...when you get more than two posts on this board (what, do you lie in wait?) you will pick up on these things...

That's not my sentence. That came right from the article linked by the OP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Would really like to have all the documents open to the eyes of the public!
 
Wouldn't it be better if this guys story is true? One less victim.
 
watermarked_big.jpg
 
As far as I am concerned there is only one thing that will "let the healing begin" and that is the William Wallace demand of the English in Braveheart, to wit:
That Sandy Barbour, the current PSU administration, the three stooges and the Paterno family stand at the 50 yard line of the next home game; put their heads between their legs and kiss their own a$$.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Goose
Victim #2 is expected to say that investigators pressured him to implicate Sandusky after he initially told them that nothing improper took place when he and Sandusky were in the locker room shower, according to court papers filed by Alexander Lindsay, the lawyer handling Sandusky's post-conviction appeals.

Victim #2 never testified in Sandusky's trial because prosecutors concluded that his story had too many holes.
That's it then. Jerry is totally innocent and the dozens of kids that accused him are all lying. As is Big Red. As is the boy and his mother who went to the police when her son came home wet after showering with Jerry. As are the two policemen who were in the other room when Jerry went to see that mother pleading that he was sorry and wished he was dead.

This clinches it for the Bots who not only wish it would go away but actually believe that a defensive co-ordinator/ child molester never roamed Happy Valley.

Yep. Now I am convinced.
 
Wouldn't it be better if this guys story is true? One less victim.
Yes, except that would convince those a##holes that the whole sordid affair never happened and the good name of Penn State should never have been drug thru the mud.

The Nits are the real victims you know.
 
Yes, except that would convince those a##holes that the whole sordid affair never happened and the good name of Penn State should never have been drug thru the mud.

The Nits are the real victims you know.
So you'd rather this guy be lying and have been abused?
 
Victim #2 is expected to say that investigators pressured him to implicate Sandusky after he initially told them that nothing improper took place when he and Sandusky were in the locker room shower, according to court papers filed by Alexander Lindsay, the lawyer handling Sandusky's post-conviction appeals.

Victim #2 never testified in Sandusky's trial because prosecutors concluded that his story had too many holes.

The Paterno family got to him. They either paid him off or threatened him...
 
Would not be shocked if Sandusky is granted a retrial that PSU fans/alumni will try to get on the jury to get him off (i.e., found not guilty, not the other kind like what he did with young boys). Pretty much is something that has been said now going on years since the scandal broke if you read any BWI threads on the topic.
 
Would not be shocked if Sandusky is granted a retrial that PSU fans/alumni will try to get on the jury to get him off (i.e., found not guilty, not the other kind like what he did with young boys). Pretty much is something that has been said now going on years since the scandal broke if you read any BWI threads on the topic.

What is both funny, sad and disgusting, is likely Sandusky will get a new trial before the Three Stooges go to trial. They have to be waiting for 1 or 2 of them to conveniently die.
 
Assuming that the guy they're dragging into the courtroom is the actual Victim #2. How can they verify that unless there was some documentation identifying him?
I was thinking the same thing. The kid would've had to have come forward on his own, since McQueary was the only other witness.
 
"Where you sexually abused by Jerry Sandusky?" the man was asked by Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Peterson, in what amounted to a very brief cross-examination.

"Yes," he responded.



Oops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Panther Parrothead
Certainly wouldn't mind if the next 3 games against PSU were cancelled due to their not having a program. it's absolutely disgusting to hear the stories and lack of institutional control at that school.

Additionally, after the Clery Act findings, it appears the lack of reporting of criminal activities is not just limited to the football program. It's time to make some serious changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: big marty
That's not my sentence. That came right from the article linked by the OP.
Ok, you dont find the Penn State culture disturbing ? Boys were raped and coaches knew. If I was a Nittany Lion I would spend everyday praying for the victims of your empire. Enjoy.the WHITEOUT. Its healing us all.
 
This proves nothing. Sandusky is such a sick freak I'm sure he had boys in showers that he didn't molest, just so this situation could happen in court. For whatever reason it just went wrong for him the first trial.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT