Those with semi-objective ears would have heard Griese talking about and complimenting that very thing, and how the shovel action with motion that we were running was just a slightly different and very creative twist on a read option spread with sweep motion, and of the triple option. Unfortunately many of our posters apparently only heard Griese criticizing the pass defense scheme, which they of course perceived as "anti_Pitt bias".
I recall back in the Nebraska glory days a college football analyst describing the brilliance of Tom Osborne's I-formation scheme. It wasn't visible to the untrained eye but Osborne used to run the same basic plays with slightly different twists and kept mixing them up all the time. He would change the blocking techniques and angles repeatedly so the defense never saw the same play twice, even though it looked like the same play to the rest of the world.
Canada is doing some things I don't remember ever seeing before, and we are scoring a ton of points. My only real criticism has been the tendency in some of the games we've been leading in to take the foot off the gas pedal in the second half, but that is more than likely Narduzzi's influence. That's how Dantonio did it at MSU, build a lead with a lot of multiple offense, then try to take the air out of the ball and sit on that lead in the second half. Of course, that works a lot better with a strong defense.