ADVERTISEMENT

CBS Sports: 5 Biggest Heisman Snubs in History

That’s ridiculous. Paul Hornung won the Heisman Trophy on a team that won two games.
Had to go back to the premier year of Leave it to Beaver for that one. Hornung won it in 56'...Times change. Processes change. If one says your team's record and bad losses does not come into play now much much more that in the past then they are simply wrong. If Pitt had 10 wins and went to an NYD bowl game that year I think Fitz wins it.
 
Rk Player School Class Pos 1st 2nd 3rd Tot Summary
1
Jason White* Oklahoma JR QB 319 204 116 1481 278 Cmp, 451 Att, 3846 Yds, 40 TD, 10 Int
2 Larry Fitzgerald* Pitt SO WR 253 233 128 1353 92 Rec, 1672 Yds, 18.2 Avg, 22 TD
3 Eli Manning* Ole Miss SR QB 95 132 161 710 275 Cmp, 441 Att, 3600 Yds, 29 TD, 10 Int
4 Chris Perry* Michigan SR RB 27 66 128 341 338 Att, 1674 Yds, 5.0 Avg, 18 TD
5 Darren Sproles* Kansas State SR RB 15 30 29 134 306 Att, 1986 Yds, 6.5 Avg, 16 TD
6 Matt Leinart* USC SO QB 5 27 58 127 255 Cmp, 402 Att, 3556 Yds, 38 TD, 9 Int
7 Philip Rivers* North Carolina State SR QB 18 20 24 118 348 Cmp, 483 Att, 4491 Yds, 34 TD, 7 Int
8 Mike Williams* USC SO WR 12 12 18 78 95 Rec, 1314 Yds, 13.8 Avg, 16 TD
9 Ben Roethlisberger* Miami (OH) JR QB 5 9 14 47 342 Cmp, 495 Att, 4486 Yds, 37 TD, 10 Int
10 B.J. Symons* Texas Tech JR QB 1 7 21 38 470 Cmp, 719 Att, 5833 Yds, 52

There are 4 NFL Hall of Famers on this list, the Heisman winner is not one of them.
 
Had to go back to the premier year of Leave it to Beaver for that one. Hornung won it in 56'...Times change. Processes change. If one says your team's record and bad losses does not come into play now much much more that in the past then they are simply wrong. If Pitt had 10 wins and went to an NYD bowl game that year I think Fitz wins it.
Yeah, and had you qualified it, I would agree. However, you did not, so I don’t.

Pitt and Oklahoma could have had the exact same record and White still would’ve won the award based on his school’s superior brand. That was my point.

That’s really how it works now. It has next to nothing to do with the on-field results, it’s all about brand and who ESPN chooses to tout for the Heisman.

That’s why they start talking about Heisman FAVORITES before a single game has been played and why they typically anoint the winner by Halloween.

Other than perhaps the heavyweight champion, or maybe the Kentucky Derby winner, I can’t think of anything that has lost more prestige or credibility in my lifetime than the Heisman Trophy winner. It used to be a very, very big deal and now it is just completely irrelevant.

Way, way too many “system guys” have won it over the years and it no longer symbolizes what it used to symbolize: the best player in college football. Now it’s the best player on the team with the best record among the small subset of the 10 or 15 most elite brands.

If you attend Alabama or Ohio State or Oklahoma, you can win it. If you put up those exact same stats, or better, and have the exact same on field accomplishments, or better, and you doing it at TCU or Oregon State or Pitt, you can forget about it.

That year proved that to me once and for all. We are never going to have a more dominant player at any position than he was at the receiver position that year;
and the rest of the field was pretty mediocre. And yet, he STILL couldn’t win it! If it didn’t happen with Fitzgerald, it is never going to happen again for us.
 
Last edited:
There are 4 NFL Hall of Famers on this list, the Heisman winner is not one of them.
But the award has to do only with playing college football just for that one season. Performance in the NFL means nothing. There was that Florida State QB that played in the NBA and never the NFL that won it, the Nebraska QB that played CFL and couldn't cut it as an NFL WR that won it, they deserved it, based on what they did in college football for that one year, later NFL performance means nothing.
 
Way, way too many “system guys” have won it over the years and it no longer symbolizes what it used to symbolize: the best player in college football. Now it’s the best player on the team with the best record among the small subset of the 10 or 15 most elite brands.

If say a QB throws for 4500 yards and 55 TDs, and his team is say, 11-2, FOR THAT YEAR, he can be considered the best player in college football, doesn't matter at all that he's useless without the system or that his ability doesn't translate to the NFL ever, he was the best in COLLEGE football for that ONE YEAR.
 
The criteria for the awarding of the Heisman Trophy does not include team win/loss record. Nor does it specify statistical data.
"The Heisman Trophy annually recognizes the outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity. The winner of the trophy epitomizes great ability combined with diligence, perseverance, and hard work."
For those of you bashing or mystified by Paul Hornung's Heisman selection while playing on a ND team with a 2 -8 record: Hornung played both offense and defense.
In his (senior) Heisman season, "he led his team offensively in passing, rushing, scoring, kickoff and punt returns, and punting. On defense, he led his team in passes broken up, and was second in interceptions and tackles made."
He was selected #1 overall in the NFL draft. He led the leauge in scoring 3 consecutive years (1959 -1961). He was selected to both the college and Pro Football Hall of Fame.
 
If say a QB throws for 4500 yards and 55 TDs, and his team is say, 11-2, FOR THAT YEAR, he can be considered the best player in college football, doesn't matter at all that he's useless without the system or that his ability doesn't translate to the NFL ever, he was the best in COLLEGE football for that ONE YEAR.

First, White had 40 touchdown passes, not 55; which was 12 off the national lead. He was 10th in completions and seventh in passing yardage.

Additionally, White was outside the top 10 in pass completion percentage and in yards per pass attempt (Roethlisberger and Rutherford were 7th and 8th respectively). He was seventh in adjusted yards per pass attempt and passing efficiency.

In fact, It may come as a surprise to you to learn that White was not the national leader in ANY major statistical category that year. If you’re just going to rely on statistics, which would be dumb, he wasn’t even the best player in that air raid system that year; BJ Symons was. Everyone in that system puts up gaudy numbers every year.

White had a very good year on a very good team with a very good tradition. However, everyone who watched him play could see that he was not a supremely talented athlete. He hobbled around and had a pretty weak arm. However, his team scored a lot of points and the rest of his team was very good too.

Conversely, Fitzgerald was a dominant physical specimen whom no one could handle. He set the record for receiving touchdowns in a season and also led the nation in receiving yards - two of the three major statistics for that position. Additionally, people could immediately identify that he was far and away the person carrying that entire football team. Without Larry Fitzgerald, Walt Harris would have been fired years earlier.

There is a reason why White went undrafted even though he played quarterback, while Fitzgerald was the number three overall pick. It was not because everyone thought White was a better player, college or otherwise.

White was the right guy on the right team in the right system. He was absolutely not the best player in college football that year. People can argue otherwise until they are blue in the face, but I’m going to trust my own eyes over this nonsensical argument.

Finally, everyone gets on Ron Cook for his ridiculous vote, as well they should. It’s one thing for someone in Oregon or Texas to miss on Fitzgerald – he played half a country away. However, Cook saw Fitzgerald play every week, or at least he should have, and to miss on his rare talent was completely inexcusable.

However, it is equally important to note that Larry Fitzgerald did not receive a single first place vote in the entire state of Pennsylvania. Do you know who did? Former Michigan State quarterback/junkie, and central Pennsylvania native, Jeff Smoker. Apparently, we are the only place without homers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PittAU
First, White had 40 touchdown passes, not 55; which was 12 off the national lead. He was 10th in completions and seventh in passing yardage.

Additionally, White was outside the top 10 in pass completion percentage and in yards per pass attempt (Roethlisberger and Rutherford were 7th and 8th respectively). He was seventh in adjusted yards per pass attempt and passing efficiency.

In fact, It may come as a surprise to you to learn that White was not the national leader in ANY major statistical category that year. If you’re just going to rely on statistics, which would be dumb, he wasn’t even the best player in that air raid system that year; BJ Symons was. Everyone in that system puts up gaudy numbers every year.

White had a very good year on a very good team with a very good tradition. However, everyone who watched him play could see that he was not a supremely talented athlete. He hobbled around and had a pretty weak arm. However, his team scored a lot of points and the rest of his team was very good too.

Conversely, Fitzgerald was a dominant physical specimen whom no one could handle. He set the record for receiving touchdowns in a season and also led the nation in receiving yards - two of the three major statistics for that position. Additionally, people could immediately identify that he was far and away the person carrying that entire football team. Without Larry Fitzgerald, Walt Harris would have been fired years earlier.

There is a reason why White went undrafted even though he played quarterback, while Fitzgerald was the number three overall pick. It was not because everyone thought White was a better player, college or otherwise.

White was the right guy on the right team in the right system. He was absolutely not the best player in college football that year. People can argue otherwise until they are blue in the face, but I’m going to trust my own eyes over this nonsensical argument.

Finally, everyone gets on Ron Cook for his ridiculous vote, as well they should. It’s one thing for someone in Oregon or Texas to miss on Fitzgerald – he played half a country away. However, Cook saw Fitzgerald play every week, or at least he should have, and to miss on his rare talent was completely inexcusable.

However, it is equally important to note that Larry Fitzgerald did not receive a single first place vote in the entire state of Pennsylvania. Do you know who did? Former Michigan State quarterback/junkie, and central Pennsylvania native, Jeff Smoker. Apparently, we are the only place without homers.

White is still among the worthy candidates. Being undrafted by the NFL is irrelevant. You can be the best player in college football for a year and then never play in the NFL or really suck in the NFL, it happens all the time.
 
If you are not even drafted into the NFL following your senior year, there is no way in hell you were the best player in college football that year. Just defies common sense.

If you were undrafted and you played quarterback, the most vital position in the sport, then it is a flat out joke that you were considered the best player in college football that year.

There are 32 teams in the National Football League and seven full rounds. When you throw in compensatory picks and all the rest of it, you’re looking at somewhere between 250 and 260 players drafted in a given year.

You are the best player in college football but you’re not one of the 260 best professional prospects? If that’s true, then something is terribly, terribly wrong with every single scouting department in the NFL.

I mean, seriously, who doesn’t want/need a great quarterback? You are telling me that the best player in college football, not just the best quarterback, was available at the 250th selection and he was passed on then?

Well, then something is clearly amiss, right? Over the years NBA players have been drafted, rugby players have been drafted, random famous people have been drafted. However, not the best player in college football?

That leads me to one of two conclusions:

Either everyone running every NFL team is grossly incompetent and should be immediately replaced; or - and stick with me here because this is a completely off-the-wall theory, the system by which White was determined to be the best player in college football is antiquated and archaic and should be completely disregarded.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PittAU
But the award has to do only with playing college football just for that one season. Performance in the NFL means nothing. There was that Florida State QB that played in the NBA and never the NFL that won it, the Nebraska QB that played CFL and couldn't cut it as an NFL WR that won it, they deserved it, based on what they did in college football for that one year, later NFL performance means nothing.

Ok, but Jason White threw for 40 TDs and 3800 yards in an air raid offense on a loaded team. I am guessing at least 25 other QB's could put up those numbers that year on Oklahoma. In fact, the QB at Texas Tech threw for 52 TDs. Dan Marino his Jr year in one less game and in a non air raid, spread era threw for 37 TDs his Jr year.

My point, what did Jason White do that was that great?

Again, at least 25 other QB's would have matched White's numbers in the same situation. How many other player's would have matched Fitz's? Zero. That's how many. Zero.
 
Ok, but Jason White threw for 40 TDs and 3800 yards in an air raid offense on a loaded team. I am guessing at least 25 other QB's could put up those numbers that year on Oklahoma. In fact, the QB at Texas Tech threw for 52 TDs. Dan Marino his Jr year in one less game and in a non air raid, spread era threw for 37 TDs his Jr year.

My point, what did Jason White do that was that great?

Again, at least 25 other QB's would have matched White's numbers in the same situation. How many other player's would have matched Fitz's? Zero. That's how many. Zero.

Here is the point.

The 2003 season was still early in the Air Raid/spread renaissance that has become so prevalent in the sport today, so we weren't used to seeing some of the numbers QBs were posting. White finished the season with 3,846 passing yards, but it was the 40 touchdowns that grabbed your attention. The problem is that those 40 touchdowns were only good enough for second in the country. Texas Tech's QB B.J. Symons (hello, Mike Leach) threw 52. As for his yardage total, White finished seventh in the nation in yards, 20th in completion percentage, and 14th in yards per attempt. Also, in White's final two games of the season against Kansas State in the Big 12 Championship and LSU in the Sugar Bowl, he was a combined 40-of-87 passing (45.9 percent) for 400 yards, no touchdowns and four interceptions.

The final vote shouldn't even have been close.

The problem is, half of the Heisman voters are fanboy locals and the biggest programs will get this. This is why Pitt fans are so pissed at Cook and Smizik. If there is a tie, or a close decision, then go with the local kid, because that is exactly what is done by every voter. Unless there is an overwhelming choice, voters and conference affiliated voters go with the local guy.
 
If you are not even drafted into the NFL following your senior year, there is no way in hell you were the best player in college football that year. Just defies common sense.

If you were undrafted and you played quarterback, the most vital position in the sport, then it is a flat out joke that you were considered the best player in college football that year.

There are 32 teams in the National Football League and seven full rounds. When you throw in compensatory picks and all the rest of it, you’re looking at somewhere between 250 and 260 players drafted in a given year.

You are the best player in college football but you’re not one of the 260 best professional prospects? If that’s true, then something is terribly, terribly wrong with every single scouting department in the NFL.

I mean, seriously, who doesn’t want/need a great quarterback? You are telling me that the best player in college football, not just the best quarterback, was available at the 250th selection and he was passed on then?

Well, then something is clearly amiss, right? Over the years NBA players have been drafted, rugby players have been drafted, random famous people have been drafted. However, not the best player in college football?

There's nothing defying common sense here, this guy White had a monster year in college football, He had a legit claim to best player, why he wasn't a pro prospect I don't know, but he performed at a high level, at the level of competition the award is given for. Charlie Ward was also not drafted and went on to a great career in the NBA.
 
Ok, but Jason White threw for 40 TDs and 3800 yards in an air raid offense on a loaded team. I am guessing at least 25 other QB's could put up those numbers that year on Oklahoma. In fact, the QB at Texas Tech threw for 52 TDs. Dan Marino his Jr year in one less game and in a non air raid, spread era threw for 37 TDs his Jr year.

My point, what did Jason White do that was that great?

Again, at least 25 other QB's would have matched White's numbers in the same situation. How many other player's would have matched Fitz's? Zero. That's how many. Zero.
Still he has a legit claim. You're crossing over into your opinions.
 
First, White had 40 touchdown passes, not 55; which was 12 off the national lead. He was 10th in completions and seventh in passing yardage.

Additionally, White was outside the top 10 in pass completion percentage and in yards per pass attempt (Roethlisberger and Rutherford were 7th and 8th respectively). He was seventh in adjusted yards per pass attempt and passing efficiency.

In fact, It may come as a surprise to you to learn that White was not the national leader in ANY major statistical category that year. If you’re just going to rely on statistics, which would be dumb, he wasn’t even the best player in that air raid system that year; BJ Symons was. Everyone in that system puts up gaudy numbers every year.

White had a very good year on a very good team with a very good tradition. However, everyone who watched him play could see that he was not a supremely talented athlete. He hobbled around and had a pretty weak arm. However, his team scored a lot of points and the rest of his team was very good too.

Conversely, Fitzgerald was a dominant physical specimen whom no one could handle. He set the record for receiving touchdowns in a season and also led the nation in receiving yards - two of the three major statistics for that position. Additionally, people could immediately identify that he was far and away the person carrying that entire football team. Without Larry Fitzgerald, Walt Harris would have been fired years earlier.

There is a reason why White went undrafted even though he played quarterback, while Fitzgerald was the number three overall pick. It was not because everyone thought White was a better player, college or otherwise.

White was the right guy on the right team in the right system. He was absolutely not the best player in college football that year. People can argue otherwise until they are blue in the face, but I’m going to trust my own eyes over this nonsensical argument.

Finally, everyone gets on Ron Cook for his ridiculous vote, as well they should. It’s one thing for someone in Oregon or Texas to miss on Fitzgerald – he played half a country away. However, Cook saw Fitzgerald play every week, or at least he should have, and to miss on his rare talent was completely inexcusable.

However, it is equally important to note that Larry Fitzgerald did not receive a single first place vote in the entire state of Pennsylvania. Do you know who did? Former Michigan State quarterback/junkie, and central Pennsylvania native, Jeff Smoker. Apparently, we are the only place without homers.


BOOM!

However, it is equally important to note that Larry Fitzgerald did not receive a single first place vote in the entire state of Pennsylvania. Do you know who did? Former Michigan State quarterback/junkie, and central Pennsylvania native, Jeff Smoker.

close the thread.
 
However, everyone who watched him play could see that he was not a supremely talented athlete. He hobbled around and had a pretty weak arm. However, his team scored a lot of points and the rest of his team was very good too.

.

That makes it more impressive, not less, it's not "best athlete". Whatever you say, White has a legit claim for Heisman. "Best Player" is totally subjective, you can spin what he did as being the best player.
 
I would of loved Fitz getting the Heisman. But it's not that big a deal and definitely not a Nitter conspiracy.
 
I don’t see it as some sort of Penn State conspiracy. I see it like I see all of college football – a system that is specifically designed to cater to the 10 or 15 schools that bring in the vast amount of the sport’s wealth. Fortunately for White, Oklahoma happens to be one of those schools. Unfortunately for Fitzgerald, Pitt is not one of those schools.

However, when I see decisions like this one or several others that had preceded it, and several more which have followed it, I’m not going to pretend it was the correct decision or that it was in any way merit-based.

No, it wasn’t.

It was clearly a two horse race and one of the horses was very obviously better than the other one. However, unfortunately for us, and for Larry Fitzgerald, the better horse picked the wrong brand than did the inferior horse and the powers that be were not going to allow that to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitt79
There's nothing defying common sense here, this guy White had a monster year in college football, He had a legit claim to best player, why he wasn't a pro prospect I don't know, but he performed at a high level, at the level of competition the award is given for. Charlie Ward was also not drafted and went on to a great career in the NBA.

I can solve that seemingly impossible riddle.

I know exactly why Jason White wasn’t one of the 260 best pro prospects in his draft. Because he wasn’t that good in the first place, that’s why!

He was a system quarterback in a system that produces gaudy numbers every single year at many, many schools. He was also doing it in a time before the defenses (and the rules) had caught up to that system.

He was a fraud – plain and simple. I can understand why voters at the time were fooled by it. I cannot understand why anyone, with the benefit of hindsight, would continue to pretend to be fooled by it?

The CBS article is right. It’s a joke that Jason White was chosen over Larry Fitzgerald, Jr., for the Heisman Trophy. It was not the only obviously moronic decision and that trophy’s history. That’s why I don’t care about it anymore. It doesn’t mean anything anymore! However, that was an obviously wrong decision and to pretend otherwise is difficult to fathom.
 
I can solve that seemingly impossible riddle.

I know exactly why Jason White wasn’t one of the 260 best pro prospects in his draft. Because he wasn’t that good in the first place, that’s why!

He was a system quarterback in a system that produces gaudy numbers every single year at many, many schools. He was also doing it in a time before the defenses (and the rules) had caught up to that system.

He was a fraud – plain and simple. I can understand why voters at the time were fooled by it. I cannot understand why anyone, with the benefit of hindsight, would continue to pretend to be fooled by it?

The CBS article is right. It’s a joke that Jason White was chosen over Larry Fitzgerald, Jr., for the Heisman Trophy. It was not the only obviously moronic decision and that trophy’s history. That’s why I don’t care about it anymore. It doesn’t mean anything anymore! However, that was an obviously wrong decision and to pretend otherwise is difficult to fathom.
Being good in college football and not good in the pros is very common. Like the Navy QB from a couple years back who rushed for like 1500 and 30 TDs, he's trying to latch on to the Ravens as a WR, but what that guy did with Navy, he could have been a legit Heisman winner.
 
These are two totally different things. They were both classic system guys - that’s basically all they had in common.

Nobody was calling Keenan Reynolds “the best player in college football.” They thought he was a really good fit for that system. I agree with those folks. He was kind of like Navy's “Jason White” in that respect - a so-so player in most systems but a very good player in that system. Alas, he played for Navy and not Alabama or Ohio State, so he was never going to be considered.

Consider him the anti-Tim Tebow in that regard. Tebow was also very limited player in many respects, who absolutely would have struggled in most traditional systems. However, he was a perfect fit for Meyer’s system and he played for Florida, which is in that select group of elites.

Also, Reynolds was at least drafted despite the fact that he would be playing an entirely different position in the pros. Therefore, there was some real projection going on there. Also, he has to serve his country for several years, which means that you don’t know when you’re going to actually get him? That’s why he lasted until the sixth round.

White was a pure quarterback coming from a throwing offense into the NFL, where they also throw the ball very often.

The fact that literally NOBODY thought he was even worth a throwaway draft choice tells you all you need to know about his ability - as judged by the experts, whose livelihood depends on making accurate evaluations.
 
The criteria for the awarding of the Heisman Trophy does not include team win/loss record. Nor does it specify statistical data.
"The Heisman Trophy annually recognizes the outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity. The winner of the trophy epitomizes great ability combined with diligence, perseverance, and hard work."
For those of you bashing or mystified by Paul Hornung's Heisman selection while playing on a ND team with a 2 -8 record: Hornung played both offense and defense.
In his (senior) Heisman season, "he led his team offensively in passing, rushing, scoring, kickoff and punt returns, and punting. On defense, he led his team in passes broken up, and was second in interceptions and tackles made."
He was selected #1 overall in the NFL draft. He led the leauge in scoring 3 consecutive years (1959 -1961). He was selected to both the college and Pro Football Hall of Fame.

It was the era of one-platoon football. Brown and Majors were doing the same thing.
 
It was the era of one-platoon football. Brown and Majors were doing the same thing.

Correct.

The post about Hornung leading his team in passing and rushing are asinine, his stats that year have been posted here and they were horrible.

He was given the award because sportswriters at the time were infatuated with Notre Dame and he was a big name. Looking back it was an absolute embarrassment.
 
Quick look that year had Jason White leading his Sooners to victories against teams with a combined record of 77-76, and losses to teams that were a combined 24-5.

Boomer Sooner!
 
Yeah, and had you qualified it, I would agree. However, you did not, so I don’t.

Pitt and Oklahoma could have had the exact same record and White still would’ve won the award based on his school’s superior brand. That was my point.

That’s really how it works now. It has next to nothing to do with the on-field results, it’s all about brand and who ESPN chooses to tout for the Heisman.

That’s why they start talking about Heisman FAVORITES before a single game has been played and why they typically anoint the winner by Halloween.

Other than perhaps the heavyweight champion, or maybe the Kentucky Derby winner, I can’t think of anything that has lost more prestige or credibility in my lifetime than the Heisman Trophy winner. It used to be a very, very big deal and now it is just completely irrelevant.

Way, way too many “system guys” have won it over the years and it no longer symbolizes what it used to symbolize: the best player in college football. Now it’s the best player on the team with the best record among the small subset of the 10 or 15 most elite brands.

If you attend Alabama or Ohio State or Oklahoma, you can win it. If you put up those exact same stats, or better, and have the exact same on field accomplishments, or better, and you doing it at TCU or Oregon State or Pitt, you can forget about it.

That year proved that to me once and for all. We are never going to have a more dominant player at any position than he was at the receiver position that year;
and the rest of the field was pretty mediocre. And yet, he STILL couldn’t win it! If it didn’t happen with Fitzgerald, it is never going to happen again for us.
I don't think there is a chance that if Pitt was 12-1 and going to the BCS championship, that Jason White still wins that Heisman over Fitz. Not a chance.

Alabama didn't even have a Heisman winner for the first 117 years of their football program, despite 12 National Championships. Hell, Lamar Jackson just won it 2 years ago over Deshaun Watson of Clemson and Baker Mayfield at OU, despite a much worse record.
 
Correct.

The post about Hornung leading his team in passing and rushing are asinine, his stats that year have been posted here and they were horrible.

He was given the award because sportswriters at the time were infatuated with Notre Dame and he was a big name. Looking back it was an absolute embarrassment.

I'm sorry that you are unable to understand the differences between player requirements in the different eras of college football, the number of games played (ND played no bowl games,ostensibly because of the difficulty of their schedule), the restrictive rules that the defenses played under, the difficulty of schedule, and obviously, the criteria for selection of the Heisman. Your criteria that the statistics should determine the winner is contrary to that of the Heisman.

Hornung finished 5th in the Heisman vote in 1955. In his Heisman winning season of 1956, he was 2nd in the country in total offense gained, 2nd in the country in kickoff returns, 15th in passing, 16th in scoring, and led ND in 8 statistical catagories while playing injured for most of the season. Those statistics alone qualify him as a Heisman finalist. That he played injured on an injury crippled team with a 2-8 albatross of a record, yet still was selected further validates his choice.
That the fair to middling GB coach, Vince Lombardi chose him as the #1 college player drafted should more than cement his Heisman credentials.
That the NFL career of this multiple HOF player justified Lombardi's choice further
confirms the wisdom of his Heisman selection.

While I am no great fan of ND, your assertion that he was selected because the voters were infatuated by Notre Dame is "asinine".

The abject ignorance of your post is an "absolute embarrassment".
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT