Conference performance so far

[UPitt '89]

(teams playing tomorrow in parentheses)

ACC: 4-0 (3)
MVC: 2-0 (1)
B1G: 2-1 (5)
BE: 2-1 (2)
B12: 2-2 (3)
SEC: 1-1 (1)
AAC: 1-1 (2)
P12: 1-3 (3)
A10: 0-0 (3)

Others: 5-11 (9)


Bad day for the PAC 12. Gaming the RPI system got them over-seeded. Not out of the question that they go 1-2 tomorrow.

Also not out of the question for the ACC to go 0-3 tomorrow. Let's hope not.

 

[levance2]

I was glad the P12 stumbled on day 1. Ever since Howland lost control at UCLA, that league has been a joke.

 

[KiwiJeff]

(teams playing tomorrow in parentheses)

ACC: 4-0 (3)
MVC: 2-0 (1)
B1G: 2-1 (5)
BE: 2-1 (2)
B12: 2-2 (3)
SEC: 1-1 (1)
AAC: 1-1 (2)
P12: 1-3 (3)
A10: 0-0 (3)

Others: 5-11 (9)


Bad day for the PAC 12. Gaming the RPI system got them over-seeded. Not out of the question that they go 1-2 tomorrow.

Also not out of the question for the ACC to go 0-3 tomorrow. Let's hope not.

MVC 1-0?

 

[ameoba defense]

MVC 1-0?

Wichita is 2-0.

 

[KiwiJeff]

Wichita is 2-0.

Oh, ok. I forgot that game, as I got no points for it.

 

[Fk_Pitt]

I was glad the P12 stumbled on day 1. Ever since Howland lost control at UCLA, that league has been a joke.

Didn't they recently in the past few years get like 1-2 bids in the tourney one year?

And as far the Big12, they don't game the RPI, but the make-up of the conference allows for an inherent ability of all their teams to have good RPI's. As a result, a good conference is often referred to as a great conference.

 

[levance2]

Didn't they recently in the past few years get like 1-2 bids in the tourney one year?

In 2012, Colorado was 5th place and won the auto-bid, and 2nd place Cal was the only at-large. Regular season champion UW (21-10) didn't even get invited. That's pretty funny.