ADVERTISEMENT

Duke

Duke has ridiculous talent. I could coach them to the sweet 16. They run zero offense, its just clear out and go 1 on 1. But when you have that talent it works. Coach K gave up coaching and developing most guys. He gets the top players and rolls the ball out now. They are not great on defense and win with talent who scores at will on offense. It works for them but they are not the Duke of old that ran offense and had players who ran any sort of system like when they had Singler and those guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockypanther
Duke has ridiculous talent. I could coach them to the sweet 16. They run zero offense, its just clear out and go 1 on 1. But when you have that talent it works. Coach K gave up coaching and developing most guys. He gets the top players and rolls the ball out now. They are not great on defense and win with talent who scores at will on offense. It works for them but they are not the Duke of old that ran offense and had players who ran any sort of system like when they had Singler and those guys.
UNc can beat them again.
 
Duke has ridiculous talent. I could coach them to the sweet 16. They run zero offense, its just clear out and go 1 on 1. But when you have that talent it works. Coach K gave up coaching and developing most guys. He gets the top players and rolls the ball out now. They are not great on defense and win with talent who scores at will on offense. It works for them but they are not the Duke of old that ran offense and had players who ran any sort of system like when they had Singler and those guys.
We watched different games
Because I watched plenty of set offense to find the mismatch
 
Duke has ridiculous talent. I could coach them to the sweet 16. They run zero offense, its just clear out and go 1 on 1. But when you have that talent it works. Coach K gave up coaching and developing most guys. He gets the top players and rolls the ball out now. They are not great on defense and win with talent who scores at will on offense. It works for them but they are not the Duke of old that ran offense and had players who ran any sort of system like when they had Singler and those guys.
A ton of dribble drive and occasionally get it into the post. I don’t see many sets like they used to run. But that is all of college basketball.
 
We watched different games
Because I watched plenty of set offense to find the mismatch
I don’t know if those are considered sets. But they did create mismatches through handoffs, a little pistol action, and high pick and rolls. Those are more simple actions than the motion offense they used to run.
 
Duke has ridiculous talent. I could coach them to the sweet 16. They run zero offense, its just clear out and go 1 on 1. But when you have that talent it works. Coach K gave up coaching and developing most guys. He gets the top players and rolls the ball out now. They are not great on defense and win with talent who scores at will on offense. It works for them but they are not the Duke of old that ran offense and had players who ran any sort of system like when they had Singler and those guys.
This might be the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen in my life
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pittmeister
I don’t know if those are considered sets. But they did create mismatches through handoffs, a little pistol action, and high pick and rolls. Those are more simple actions than the motion offense they used to run.
The cross screens created the lane and mismatches

i honestly don’t think Duke has run a motion offense in the conventional sense like Dixon or Indiana under knight .

sure always plenty of motion particularly to get screens for shooters who worked hard to get open .
It’s a big part of why I laughed at Horton being a statue on a spot 85% of the time .
He should have been watching film of jj reddick-
Who is 4x the shooter as Horton but was a perpetual motion machine on offense
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT