ADVERTISEMENT

Facts Matter; An Analysis of Pitt vs Penn State (on and off the field)

ratking17

Head Coach
Mar 15, 2009
14,030
7,956
113
One of the great elements of college football is the history attached to it. And while Pitt has fallen on difficult times, we have a history that should be celebrated and embraced. So I wanted to provide all Pitt fans with actual facts. I am sure many of us (including those of us braving happy valley this weekend) will hear about how great Penn State is. And from the football side, I am not going to dispute that. I can engage with any football fan provided they keep it objective. Where I lose my mind with nitters is when they play the "We are" card and start in on Paterno and success with honor bullshite. So to better equip some of the ignorant, here are some important stats to remember:


National Titles

Pitt: 9
Penn State: 2

Don't allow Penn staters to tell you differently. You play for championships and Pitt claims 9. I don't care when they were or how long it has been. Embrace 9. They will talk about Paterno's record against Pitt, which goes back 4 plus decades, but somehow Pitt isn't allowed to claim their titles. Who cares what Penn Staters think. Embrace 9 and realize 9 is greater than 2.

NFL Hall of Famers

Pitt: 8
Penn State: 6

I admit not knowing how many potential nitters will get into the Hall in the near future, but Pitt has some obvious ones: R. Brown, L. Fitzgerald, D. Revis just to name a few. Shady would also merit consideration if his pace continues.

College Football Hall of Famers (sportsreference.com)

Pitt: 25
Penn State: 23

Consensus All-Americans (sportsreference.com)

Pitt: 44
Penn State: 38

What these stats show is that objectively speaking, Pitt and Penn State have similar football histories, but Pitt edging Penn State in many categories and holding a huge advantage in national titles.

So where does Penn State hold advantages?

Attendance (Phil Steele Magazine)

Penn State fills their stadium to 94.1% capacity and ranks 37th in this category.
Pitt fills their stadium to 67.4% capacity and ranks 91st in this category.

No doubt, I wish Pitt's attendance was better. But if a nitter comes at you over attendance, just remind them that while Pitt's is bad, there are 36 D1 programs that fill their stadium better than Penn State's. Additionally, if they want to brag about attendance (i.e. participation trophies), you have already won this argument.

Recent Win Percentage

Penn State wins these categories, but not by as much as you would think.

Last Year: PSU: 11-3 Pitt: 8-5
Last 3 Years: PSU: 25-15 Pitt: 22-17
Last 5 Years: PSU: 40-24 Pitt: 35-30
Last 10 Years: PSU: 87-42 Pitt: 73-56
Last 15 Years: PSU: 123-67 Pitt: 109-81
Last 20 Years: PSU: 161-89 Pitt: 136-112
Program Overall: PSU: 846-377-37 Pitt: 664-468-37

As stated, PSU wins those categories. No question about it. In a 20 year period, Penn State averages 8.1 victories per year while Pitt averages 6.8. Because victories would be in whole numbers, Penn State averages 1 more win per year than Pitt does from 2016-1997. Not as big of a difference as your Penn State friend would have you believe.

Pitt vs. Penn State History

Penn State: 50 wins
Pitt: 43 wins

Last Meeting: Pitt
Last 3 Meetings: Pitt 2 wins vs 1 loss
Last 5 Meetings: PSU 3 wins vs 2 losses
Last 10 Meetings: PSU 7 wins vs 3 losses
Last 15 Meetings: PSU 9 wins vs 5 losses with 1 tie
Last 20 Meetings: PSU 12 wins vs 7 losses with 1 tie

Penn State has the series lead. Stats don't lie here either. Too bad it won't continue past 2019.


Finally, let's discuss the real reason we love Pitt: academics. If the essence of college is to get an education, Pitt wins the most important category hands down. All information is taken from the Princeton Review.

Acceptance Rate

Pitt: 55%
PSU: 56%

Not only is Pitt slightly more selective, but Penn State has 53,000 applicants compared to Pitt's 29,000.

SAT Scores (Low end and average included)

Pitt: 1190 Low/1285 Average
PSU: 1090 Low/1195 Average

Pitt incoming students have an average SAT score of 100 more points when compared to Penn State.

HS G.P.A.

Pitt: 4.14
PSU: 3.59

Percentage of students with a 3.75 HS G.P.A. or higher

Pitt: 81%
PSU: 33%

It is extremely clear that Pitt is more selective and has a much higher quality student than a Penn Stater. Additionally, this doesn't even take into account the 20+ branch campuses that filter in students to their main campus which would dilute these numbers even further.


So in closing, I hope that Pitt fans take stock in what actual facts tell you. Pitt is superior in almost every element to Penn State, both on and off the field.
 
One of the great elements of college football is the history attached to it. And while Pitt has fallen on difficult times, we have a history that should be celebrated and embraced. So I wanted to provide all Pitt fans with actual facts. I am sure many of us (including those of us braving happy valley this weekend) will hear about how great Penn State is. And from the football side, I am not going to dispute that. I can engage with any football fan provided they keep it objective. Where I lose my mind with nitters is when they play the "We are" card and start in on Paterno and success with honor bullshite. So to better equip some of the ignorant, here are some important stats to remember:


National Titles

Pitt: 9
Penn State: 2

Don't allow Penn staters to tell you differently. You play for championships and Pitt claims 9. I don't care when they were or how long it has been. Embrace 9. They will talk about Paterno's record against Pitt, which goes back 4 plus decades, but somehow Pitt isn't allowed to claim their titles. Who cares what Penn Staters think. Embrace 9 and realize 9 is greater than 2.

NFL Hall of Famers

Pitt: 8
Penn State: 6

I admit not knowing how many potential nitters will get into the Hall in the near future, but Pitt has some obvious ones: R. Brown, L. Fitzgerald, D. Revis just to name a few. Shady would also merit consideration if his pace continues.

College Football Hall of Famers (sportsreference.com)

Pitt: 25
Penn State: 23

Consensus All-Americans (sportsreference.com)

Pitt: 44
Penn State: 38

What these stats show is that objectively speaking, Pitt and Penn State have similar football histories, but Pitt edging Penn State in many categories and holding a huge advantage in national titles.

So where does Penn State hold advantages?

Attendance (Phil Steele Magazine)

Penn State fills their stadium to 94.1% capacity and ranks 37th in this category.
Pitt fills their stadium to 67.4% capacity and ranks 91st in this category.

No doubt, I wish Pitt's attendance was better. But if a nitter comes at you over attendance, just remind them that while Pitt's is bad, there are 36 D1 programs that fill their stadium better than Penn State's. Additionally, if they want to brag about attendance (i.e. participation trophies), you have already won this argument.

Recent Win Percentage

Penn State wins these categories, but not by as much as you would think.

Last Year: PSU: 11-3 Pitt: 8-5
Last 3 Years: PSU: 25-15 Pitt: 22-17
Last 5 Years: PSU: 40-24 Pitt: 35-30
Last 10 Years: PSU: 87-42 Pitt: 73-56
Last 15 Years: PSU: 123-67 Pitt: 109-81
Last 20 Years: PSU: 161-89 Pitt: 136-112
Program Overall: PSU: 846-377-37 Pitt: 664-468-37

As stated, PSU wins those categories. No question about it. In a 20 year period, Penn State averages 8.1 victories per year while Pitt averages 6.8. Because victories would be in whole numbers, Penn State averages 1 more win per year than Pitt does from 2016-1997. Not as big of a difference as your Penn State friend would have you believe.

Pitt vs. Penn State History

Penn State: 50 wins
Pitt: 43 wins

Last Meeting: Pitt
Last 3 Meetings: Pitt 2 wins vs 1 loss
Last 5 Meetings: PSU 3 wins vs 2 losses
Last 10 Meetings: PSU 7 wins vs 3 losses
Last 15 Meetings: PSU 9 wins vs 5 losses with 1 tie
Last 20 Meetings: PSU 12 wins vs 7 losses with 1 tie

Penn State has the series lead. Stats don't lie here either. Too bad it won't continue past 2019.


Finally, let's discuss the real reason we love Pitt: academics. If the essence of college is to get an education, Pitt wins the most important category hands down. All information is taken from the Princeton Review.

Acceptance Rate

Pitt: 55%
PSU: 56%

Not only is Pitt slightly more selective, but Penn State has 53,000 applicants compared to Pitt's 29,000.

SAT Scores (Low end and average included)

Pitt: 1190 Low/1285 Average
PSU: 1090 Low/1195 Average

Pitt incoming students have an average SAT score of 100 more points when compared to Penn State.

HS G.P.A.

Pitt: 4.14
PSU: 3.59

Percentage of students with a 3.75 HS G.P.A. or higher

Pitt: 81%
PSU: 33%

It is extremely clear that Pitt is more selective and has a much higher quality student than a Penn Stater. Additionally, this doesn't even take into account the 20+ branch campuses that filter in students to their main campus which would dilute these numbers even further.


So in closing, I hope that Pitt fans take stock in what actual facts tell you. Pitt is superior in almost every element to Penn State, both on and off the field.
I want to go to Bowl games not friggin graduation ceremonies so that's that.

Most of Pitt's wins against State College are pre Grandpa Munster.

Who really gives a shite about pre Poll MNC.
I don't care at all about Yale being voted MNC 10 times by The Loyal Order Of Moose or some such nonsense.

State went thru the worst scandal ever...should have been death penaltied no doubt...but are coming back unbelievably strong and fast.
Franklin is kicking Duzz's arse every way to Sunday in recruiting...

State crushes Pitt in total school wins.
And it ain't even close.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Franklinstheman
I want to win football games , screw the egg heads who ruined it for all of us and continue to do so , and are as cheap as they are arrogant and stubborn
 
  • Like
Reactions: pbrad and paulbl99
I want to go to Bowl games not friggin graduation ceremonies so that's that.

Most of Pitt's wins against State College are pre Grandpa Munster.

Who really gives a shite about pre Poll MNC.
I don't care at all about Yale being voted MNC 10 times by The Loyal Order of Moose or some such nonsense.

State went thru the worst scandal ever...should have been death penaltied no doubt...but are coming back unbelievably strong and fast.
Franklin is kicking Duzz's arse every way to Sunday in recruiting...

State blows Pitt away in total school wins.
And it ain't even close.


Duzz has got passed in recruiting by most teams we play and WVU
 
We got Browne, they got Grier. They have better skill positions and faster LBers. We have fell far behind in recruiting , especially speed
 
Since you want objective facts, I am sure you are aware of the 96 times the teams have played that 69 or 72% of the games were played in Pittsburgh.

The series would be far more lopsided with a more equitable balance of location.
 
Since you want objective facts, I am sure you are aware of the 96 times the teams have played that 69 or 72% of the games were played in Pittsburgh.

The series would be far more lopsided with a more equitable balance of location.

I can only guess that you are young, and don't understand the history of the series.

Penn State wanted to play in Pittsburgh so they could be on TV. Back in the day, it wasn't likely that TV crews would venture to a cow pasture to film a game.

Big bad Pitt didn't force anything on little Penn State, despite what you might hear from your fans.

Edit to add: PSU also wanted to play in a larger stadium.
 
I can only guess that you are young, and don't understand the history of the series.

Penn State wanted to play in Pittsburgh so they could be on TV. Back in the day, it wasn't likely that TV crews would venture to a cow pasture to film a game.

Big bad Pitt didn't force anything on little Penn State, despite what you might hear from your fans.

Edit to add: PSU also wanted to play in a larger stadium.
And it allowed the farmers to do some early Christmas shopping in town.

They were fine with it until Beaver Field was moved and Grandpa starting building powerhouses.
 
Penn state has the worst scandal in sports history so there's that... and it's linked irreversibly to the football program...

And the period of time in question is the same time they acquired all those wins...

They can keep that....
 
Penn state has the worst scandal in sports history so there's that... and it's linked irreversibly to the football program...

And the period of time in question is the same time they acquired all those wins...

They can keep that....
That's a very good post.

Sorry thing, Paterno was a great coach when a young man and his teams between 1965 and '80 were as well coached as any save for Bryant.

But his vindictiveness and massive egomania overwhelmed him to get MNCs and records.
He would do and did anything to remain in power at State and win football games.
 
That's a good takeaway. But let's be honest, Penn State's program is so much bigger than ours. And while history is great, our last national title came before the explosion of cable TV, and most came before TV even was invented or relevant.

That being said, what also gets undersold by Penn Staters and major college football powers, that as far as talent that has gone through the schools, Pitt can hold its own with practically anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski11585
That's a good takeaway. But let's be honest, Penn State's program is so much bigger than ours. And while history is great, our last national title came before the explosion of cable TV, and most came before TV even was invented or relevant.

That being said, what also gets undersold by Penn Staters and major college football powers, that as far as talent that has gone through the schools, Pitt can hold its own with practically anyone.
We are and have been in an era of massive in flux of monies.....
It's all about TV, Media & fan base.....

PA still remains the 5th largest state and PSU has the name of the commonwealth on its front door. That's bigly. Read here its fanbase is 3 times the size of Pitt's.

As for historic talent Pitt can be in the same conversation w any program ever.
Problem is the Eggheads running the school and its Ath Dept have not been able to find or keep coaching talent anywhere equal to the remarkable athletes going through this university. Worse yet they have in their pompous incompetence trampled on success more than once.

Now , we go against schools paying 6-10 very large for football coaches.

That's a problem.
 
Uh, this is college football. Academics are supposed to matter. If you are not into that, the NFL is better suited for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DruidTM
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT