I just liked your post, then realized it’s a year old. Lol.Does obsessing about conference realignment for meaningless teams count towards the “more basketball knowledge than anyone” claim?
I just liked your post, then realized it’s a year old. Lol.Does obsessing about conference realignment for meaningless teams count towards the “more basketball knowledge than anyone” claim?
I don’t follow FCS football much...is the Big South a downgrade in football vs the NEC or about the same level?
Are we sure he isn’t talking about Houston Baptist? Never heard of cal either.Cal Baptist? I've been living in California 20 years and didn't know Cal Baptist existed.
Are we sure he isn’t talking about Houston Baptist? Never heard of cal either.
Seriously. Who cares?
Nope.Can you honestly say you dont care about the balance of power in HBCU D1 basketball shifting to the SWAC? What's going on in the MEAC? Will it become the next WAC? Might they have to take on non-HBCU schools to survive? Who will Pitt schedule in Nov/Dec if the MEAC fades away?
On the surface, this doesn't make a ton of sense because the SL is one of the better mid-major basketball leagues so why would some of their best teams leave for a league struggling to survive like the WAC?
Those schools are leaving the Southland because not only is the Southland NOT one of the better mid-major basketball leagues, it is perennially one of the worst.
How dare you besmirch Nicholls State like that?
You really like to pump the Southland, but it isn't actually all that good.
This year so far it is ranked as the 30th best conference by Pomeroy. Out of 32. The WAC is 27, so not much better. Last year the Southland ranked 28th, the WAC 24. The year before it was 29, the WAC was 17. The year before it was 28, the WAC was 18. The year before it was 27, the WAC was 17. Do I need to keep doing this?
Those schools are leaving the Southland because not only is the Southland NOT one of the better mid-major basketball leagues, it is perennially one of the worst. They have SEVEN teams this year ranked worse than 300 in the country (and another in the 290s). It's pretty obvious that what is going on here is that schools like SFA are trying to get away from schools like McNeese and Houston Baptist. Mission accomplished.
So I guess there may be a thought that those 4 + NM St and Grand Canyon gives them a better basketball league.
The best schools in the Southland (for the most part) are moving to a conference that is already better than the Southland, and you "guess there may be a thought" that the basketball league is going to be better?
You guess?
The SLC is deeper at the top and middle but horrible from the middle down which brings everyone down.
There are 13 teams in the Southland so the 7th best team is the middle of the league. By Pomeroy rating that would be Lamar, who is 304. There are 9 teams in the WAC so the 5th best team is the middle of the league. By Pomeroy rating that would be Utah Valley, who is 282.
If that's too narrow a definition of the middle, the middle three of Southland are Northwestern State (292), Lamar (304) and Texas A&M Corpus Christi (309). The middle three of the WAC are Cal Baptist (273), Utah Valley (282) and Seattle (283).
One of those is clearly better than the other. Oddly enough, it isn't the one that you seem to think it would be. Imagine that.
Is that this season? These teams played a couple games, come on
Last year the middle team in the Southland was McNeese at 276. The middle team in the WAC was Rio Grande Valley at 249. The year before in the Southland it was A&M Corpus Chrsti at 287, for the WAC it was Seattle at 190. The year before that in the Southland it was Abilene Christian at 262, the WAC had eight teams that year, number four was Seattle at 195 and number five was Cal Bakersfield at 242. The year before for the Southland it was Sam Houston State at 234, for the WAC it was Grand Canyon in 4th at 152 and UMKC in 5th at 219.
Do you want me to keep going? Because I can. When the facts are on your side this is easy. The notion that the middle of the Southland is and has been better than the middle of the WAC is, well, wacky.
The whole things seems rigged.
It is rigged. They rigged it so the better teams have the higher rankings and the worse teams have lower ones.
How dare they!
It is rigged. They rigged it so the better teams have the higher rankings and the worse teams have lower ones.
How dare they!
#stopthesteal
Its very likely these rankings were rigged to make the WAC look like the better conference so they can raid the Southland. My eyes and my vast knowledge of college basketball tell me that the SLC is better. We cant trust the computers. Were any SLC representatives watching the computers when the results were tabulated?
We should convene at the Four Seasons (dry cleaners) in Squirrel Hill at once.
As a Kansas City resident, my dream mid-major regional conference would consist of:
- Creighton
- Drake
- MO State
- Northern Iowa
- Omaha
- Oral Roberts
- Saint Louis
- SE MO State
- UMKC
- Wichita State
I know this would never happen, for obvious reasons, but it’d be a fun mid-major conference with a lot of regional and historic rivals.
Its very likely these rankings were rigged to make the WAC look like the better conference so they can raid the Southland. My eyes and my vast knowledge of college basketball tell me that the SLC is better. We cant trust the computers. Were any SLC representatives watching the computers when the results were tabulated?
The fact that Chicago State, Seattle and UT-Rio Grande Valley are in that conference together tells you all you need to know about the thin ice it has been on for quite some time.I confess to not knowing much about the inner workings of the Southland, but the WAC has literally been about to close its doors multiple times over the last 2 decades. Poaching these teams would give them some semblance of stability at least temporarily.
Would be awesome to have another conference tournament in Kansas City. If you ever get the chance, the Big XII Tournament is a good one to attend. It’s not the Garden, but it’s a lot of fun.This is a conference tournament I would attend.
The fact that Chicago State, Seattle and UT-Rio Grande Valley are in that conference together tells you all you need to know about the thin ice it has been on for quite some time.
I remember back in the 80s how innovative and fun WAC football was to watch.
With the American adding 6 CUSA schools (UTSA, UNT, Rice, Charlotte, FAU, UAB) which is a major blow to their basketball league, I wonder if Memphis, Temple, and Wichita State will leave and join the A10 and maybe make their own football-only league
Memphis
Temple
UConn
UMass
Liberty
NM State
Army
Memphis will hold out for a B12 invite for as long as it takes. It’s absolutely vital to them that Penny’s model works and keeps them relevant, otherwise they’re in some trouble even with all that FedEx money behind them.
As a basketball conference, the AAC is all but done which is disappointing as it really did have some strong teams/moments. You just can’t have a league where the only goal for 2/3 of the members is to get out and hope to have any type of lasting success.
I don't see how Memphis staying in the American helps their Big 12 chances any. Lets say this is their football division
Tulsa
Tulane
Rice
UTSA
SMU
North Texas
Does that + a horrific basketball conference help them get in the Big 12 over A10 hoops + a hypothetical A10 Football Conference considering of them, UMass, Temple, UConn, Army, and others? They'd also have more flexibility to schedule good OOC games. Like a quasi-independent.
Honestly, the Mountain West should go get Memphis, SMU, Gonzaga, and Wichita State. That would be a dynamite basketball league. Probably better than the ACC as bad as the ACC has been.