ADVERTISEMENT

Future Pitt/ND games

Sean Miller Fan

Lair Hall of Famer
Oct 30, 2001
68,246
22,038
113
Did I miss the memo? It appears that Notre Dame's ACC schedule up until 2025 has already been set. I thought they just did the first 3-6 years but they've gone further than that.

Pitt will host ND in 2015, 2020, and 2025. We'll go to South Bend in 2018 and 2023.

ESPN is also using Notre Dame as part of their ACC/Labor Day Night package as they travel to Louisville in 2019 and FSU in 2021.

http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa/indep/notre-dame-fighting-irish.php
This post was edited on 2/6 10:39 AM by Sean Miller Fan
 
Always good to have ND on the schedule. Will any of those years overlap with our PSU series?
 
Originally posted by Sean Miller Fan:
Did I miss the memo? It appears that Notre Dame's ACC schedule up until 2025 has already been set. I thought they just did the first 3-6 years but they've gone further than that.

Pitt will host ND in 2015, 2020, and 2025. We'll go to South Bend in 2018 and 2023.

ESPN is also using Notre Dame as part of their ACC/Labor Day Night package as they travel to Louisville in 2019 and FSU in 2021.

http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa/indep/notre-dame-fighting-irish.php
This post was edited on 2/6 10:39 AM by Sean Miller Fan
Here is the memo. Last October all 60 pairings were announced and dates through 2019.

ACC Notre Dame
 
yes you missed the memo. It was a huge announcement and got lots of discussion. Pitt gets the most home games with ND of any team in the ACC
 
Originally posted by braves2121:
yes you missed the memo.
Apparently. Seems like we get ND every 5 years when most others get them every 6. Maybe it was the ACC being nice to us since we had an every-year thing going with them and lost the most with the new ACC/ND arrangement.
 
This is the one big drawback to being in the ACC now. Pitt has been playing ND for the most part for 80 years. We have to pare back this series to accomodate the Irish and the ACC. The ACC should have allowed the ND series to go on as before for Pitt and BC.
 
Originally posted by wbrpanther:
This is the one big drawback to being in the ACC now. Pitt has been playing ND for the most part for 80 years. We have to pare back this series to accomodate the Irish and the ACC.
This is not a drawback to being in the ACC. This is a drawback to the current state of college football. Plenty of ND's traditional rivals are getting completely cut off. Pitt is not.

Blame ND for still being an independent, not the ACC.
 
Agree with both of you. It's a game that should be played every year, just as Michigan v. Notre Dame is. So is Pitt/PSU. This mega conference realignment bull$hit is resulting in a great many of these kinds of travesties to the game of college football.
 
By 2020... when ND realizes that being in a conference all-in is in their best interest as far as making the playoffs, they will join the ACC full time.


The 5-games-per-year agreement is to wean their hardcore fans away from the "Independence or Death!" feelings they have.

After playing 5 ACC games a year for a half dozen years... It will be an easier pill to swallow for the Irish to add three more to go to 8.

They're typical schedule will then be ... 8 ACC games... USC, Stanford, Navy, (someone else).


When the playoff moves to 8 teams... and it will... the P5 conferences will all get their champ in and there will be three "at large" bids. Every team in a P5 conference therefore has two opportunities to get in: Win the conference or be an at-large. The Irish, if they remain independent, will only have the one option - at large.

At that time... they will, perhaps begrudgingly, join the ACC full time.


Swarbrick knows this... he just has to gradually bring his alumni base along.
 
Nonsense. If the playoff moves to 8 teams, ND has now and will continue to have, an easier road into the playoff than P5 teams do.

All ND has to do to get in is win 10 games. Period. They don't have to worry about a conference championship game, or any other shenanigans.

A 10-2 Notre Dame is in. Every year.
 
Originally posted by OakParkPanther:
Nonsense. If the playoff moves to 8 teams, ND has now and will continue to have, an easier road into the playoff than P5 teams do.

All ND has to do to get in is win 10 games. Period. They don't have to worry about a conference championship game, or any other shenanigans.

A 10-2 Notre Dame is in. Every year.
Committee doesn't have pro-ND biases like AP voters do. Doubt this committee is swayed by any Irish "mystique".

You saw how committee penalized Big 12 teams for not playing that 13th championship game. Same thing would happen to a 10-2 Irish.
 
delete


This post was edited on 2/8 6:21 AM by UPitt '89
 
Originally posted by OakParkPanther:
Nonsense. If the playoff moves to 8 teams, ND has now and will continue to have, an easier road into the playoff than P5 teams do.

All ND has to do to get in is win 10 games. Period. They don't have to worry about a conference championship game, or any other shenanigans.

A 10-2 Notre Dame is in. Every year.
wow, Ill have what your having.

With an 8 team playoff P5 teams can get in 2 ways.. win your conference or recieve an at large. ND would have only one option, at-large. Like this year there will be several one loss team looking for the 3 spots... once in a while a 2 loss team. But there will be several 2 loss teams trying to cram in.

You can lose all your OOC games, play in a bad division in a poor conference and get that auto bid by winning your conference.. not for ND.
 
Lawyer Mike, as long as it's "subjective" then ND gets in

maybe not 10-2, but an 11-1 ND team gets in over an 11-1 team in any conference other than SEC.
 
That was a huge argument on the Irish board this year, as to what exactly it will take in the future for ND to see the play off.

If you look at this year (the only one we have) of the playoff to base line off of.

The best team left out was a team without a conference championship game. And 1 loss. Meaning that a team playing on all cylinders at the end of the season, with a back loaded schedule was left out for the reasoning that they were named "co-champ" of their conference vs the only loss they had, along with they only had 12 games, where every member of the play off had 13. All of the play off competitors played a top 25 team at a neutral site, with 1 week to prepare and won.

ND I will argue will be almost impossible to keep out in any undefeated year, and I would make that same argument for any team that plays 12 D1A opponents and goes undefeated. However as soon as ND has any loss (especially late season losses) they will be at the mercy of the rest of the P5 conferences. Say this year ND only had 1 loss. The best possible selection would have been FSU (the only play off team ND played heads up). Then how do you pick ND over FSU? You can't. ND only played 12 games. Lost to the ACC Champ, and the ACC champ won in the conference championship.

ND against a 4 team play off will land on the short end of the stick far more often then not. Never has undefeated or nothing meant more then it does now. ND cannot compete on a 12 game schedule vs opponents that will play a 13 game schedule with their final game almost being a guaranteed top 25 on a neutral field. The Playoff committee has already said CCG will be part of the selection process. And in the media today, the CCG is the end all be all of of P5 conferences.

Now if you expand the playoff to 8 teams. Then everything changes. And all of this argument is for not. Because under that model you could easily have each of the P5 conference champions, plus 3 'at-large' selections. And then you are back to 'bowl busters'.

As to the person talking about the ND / Michigan series. If you think that is an 'every year' event. You should look at the total games played (42) with 9 of them being played before the War... World War 1 that is. For a total record of Michigan 24 wins, ND 17 wins, and 1 tie. Now look at PITT, how ND has played 69 times for a record of ND 47 PITT 21 and 1 tie.

Michigan, and tOSU dodged ND for a great many years that their rivalry was being played because neither wanted that strong of a non conference game on the schedule. Look at the years that Michigan wasn't on ND's schedule. They played every year (and multiples times a year) from 1887, until ND beat them for the first time in 1909. Michigan dropped all future games that day (literally) until 1942. Michigan won in 42 at S. Bend, and played again in 43 at Michigan Stadium. They lost that game, and canceled the series until 1978. Only since then has the bulk of the games been played, with the exception of a couple of times the schedule didn't line up.

This post was edited on 2/15 11:02 AM by IrishBlooded
 
Yes, this was my point. In an 8 team playoff, ND gets in every year they go 10-2 or better. With 8 teams, undefeateds get in, 11-1 and 12-1 almost always get in, and high ranked 10-2 will often get in.
 
Yup, UM/ND was is a relatively new thing. Meanwhile, ND has played MSU 77 times and Purdue 86 times - MSU because MSU used to be independent back in the day, like Pitt, and ND needed teams to schedule and gets a lot of interest from heavily Catholic Detroit area, and Purdue because they always felt obliged to play somebody in the state of Indiana.

Expansion and money is ruining everything. Should be 80 big teams/schools in 8 conferences playing a round robin schedule and conference champs get in 8 team playoff. That would reinvigorate rivalries. 14 team conferences aren't really conferences but instead are tv market confederations. Not as interesting.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT