What do I say? Identify a few high level players per class and pay them big money. The 3 star dudes.........everyone is a 3 star, complete lottery tickets and most will transfer anyway. Pay some 4 and 5 stars. Or dont and use it for hoops.
Well a 5-star offensive linemen would probably be the worst possible investment under that logic. Expensive and not likely to contribute for a year or two.
Plus, isn't that what Pitt has basically been for 25 mostly mediocre years? Big time talent (Fitzgerald, Revis, Donald, McCoy, etc.) surrounded by too much low end talent for it to matter much.
Especially one that is 265 lbs ... he is gonna have to bulk up, he isn't even big enough to play tackle at the FCS level right now. Will probably have to be in the program at least 1 year before he sees the field.Well a 5-star offensive linemen would probably be the worst possible investment under that logic. Expensive and not likely to contribute for a year or two.
It's a horrible spot to invest the money for a team like Pitt or GT.Nice job GT. Would like to see Pitt offer that much to a 5 star.
They'll have to tap into the....
Wait....
Wait for it...
Not yet....
Still pending....
Pretty soon...
Almost...
Are you ready?....
Are sure?...
Get ready to laugh until you cry...
Here goes nothing...
3...
2...
1...
Petty cash fund!!!!!!
It's a horrible spot to invest the money for a team like Pitt or GT.
It's a horrible spot to invest the money for a team like Pitt or GT.
^^ ThisIt would be a better idea if he had played elsewhere for at least a season or two so he was at least ready to contribute this season.
... and if he was a QB. But I digress on that one.
That said, some of these deals aren't just unwisely spending from a limited fund (which is how this looks from the outside). Sometimes the donor earmarks the money for a specific player(s). That was supposedly the case with Bub Carrington. Someone was going to cover his NIL price if he came back, but that money wasn't going to be available for anyone else if he didn't.
No idea if that was the case here or not. I could just see some GT alum who is tired of losing local recruits doing that in this case.
Yeah, if you are going to pay that kind of money for a lineman, pay one who maybe had a pretty good freshman year and is looking to transfer. A guy where you have a much better idea what you are going to end up with, and who you can be reasonably sure will be a contributor all three years that you are paying him.
so he's going to make 800k redshirting and hanging out in the weight room and by this time next year, looking for more money from a blue blood.
so he's going to make 800k redshirting and hanging out in the weight room and by this time next year, looking for more money from a blue blood.
It's a horrible spot to invest the money for a team like Pitt or GT.
i dont think we are saying its the position so much as it is investing that into a high school recruit at the OL position. WIth the Transfer portal and basically zero restrictions anymore, probably a long shot this kid is at Ga Tech for 4-5 years.I disagree. Assuming this kid is really good right away, I think its a great spot to invest in.
I think Pitt should identify 5 positions wher3 they can pay blue blood money. What would those be? For me its:
1 QB
2 WR
3 OL
4 DL
5 OL
i dont think we are saying its the position so much as it is investing that into a high school recruit at the OL position. WIth the Transfer portal and basically zero restrictions anymore, probably a long shot this kid is at Ga Tech for 4-5 years.
Better off going after an older and proven college Tackle in the portal than investing 800k in a high school kid who probably wont be ready to even compete in the ACC for a year or two..
It's like ohio state paying that ewers kid as a 17 year old to come play at columbus. great, you paid him to redshirt and texas got him a year later with a season of experience under his belt, all on OSU's payroll.
of course it's ohio state and they have 10 other blue chips ready to go so they'll live but same point..