Would be a nice cherry on top of a good off-season .
https://pittsburghsportsnow.com/201...-aundre-hyatt-to-make-official-visit-to-pitt/
https://pittsburghsportsnow.com/201...-aundre-hyatt-to-make-official-visit-to-pitt/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would be a nice cherry on top of a good off-season .
https://pittsburghsportsnow.com/201...-aundre-hyatt-to-make-official-visit-to-pitt/
He's top 150 and supposedly a very good wing shooter at 6'7. he has a lot more P6 offers than the ones you reference.Here's thing. There is no way Capel loses a player to SHU or Rutgers. His recruiting is so good, I question more is this kid good enough than can we close him? Under Dixon II and Stallings, we couldn't win many recruiting battles against medicore P5 programs like SHU.
He's top 150 and supposedly a very good wing shooter at 6'7. he has a lot more P6 offers than the ones you reference.Here's thing. There is no way Capel loses a player to SHU or Rutgers. His recruiting is so good, I question more is this kid good enough than can we close him? Under Dixon II and Stallings, we couldn't win many recruiting battles against medicore P5 programs like SHU.
Not sure if you've looked at what's been on the roster the past few years, but yeah, I think he's probably "good enough" to play at Pitt. I mean, are you even serious with that?
"No way" Capel loses him to SHU or Rutgers? Really? You don't think he's factoring in an evaluation of the roster compositions of all of the teams he;s considering?
You could make a case that we have too many wings right now, but you can never have too much talent, no matter what. And lack of talent has been the single biggest problem with this program over the last several years.
If we have to play with 3-4 wings, a lead guard and rotate in a token post to get the best 5 on the floor, so be it. It has been done successfully before. The 88/89 Flyin' Illini team was the best example of that I can think of. Of course, we don't have that kind of talent, but the point remains.
A guy going to another school, even a lesser school, does not always mean a recruiting loss. If we are stacked at a position, and another school has more playing time, or is closer to home, many reasons. It can happen.No. He isn't losing a player to Rutgers. SHU? Maybe, but I highly highly doubt it.
I didn't mean to knock Hyatt. I'd take him. Just saying I would wonder if we were better off holding that scholarship for 2019. Amazing I can even think that now. Hyatt would have been a prized jewel of Stallings or Dixon II
He’s too good not to take - H2P!No. He isn't losing a player to Rutgers. SHU? Maybe, but I highly highly doubt it.
I didn't mean to knock Hyatt. I'd take him. Just saying I would wonder if we were better off holding that scholarship for 2019. Amazing I can even think that now. Hyatt would have been a prized jewel of Stallings or Dixon II
I swear there was a rumor of the infamous Marcus Liberty rumor coming to pitt or transferring to Pitt. obviously, this never came true..I will always remember that Illinois team. Kendall Gill was awesome. Battle was a scrapper.
He's top 150 and supposedly a very good wing shooter at 6'7. he has a lot more P6 offers than the ones you reference.
Not sure if you've looked at what's been on the roster the past few years, but yeah, I think he's probably "good enough" to play at Pitt. I mean, are you even serious with that?
"No way" Capel loses him to SHU or Rutgers? Really? You don't think he's factoring in an evaluation of the roster compositions of all of the teams he;s considering?
You could make a case that we have too many wings right now, but you can never have too much talent, no matter what. And lack of talent has been the single biggest problem with this program over the last several years.
If we have to play with 3-4 wings, a lead guard and rotate in a token post to get the best 5 on the floor, so be it. It has been done successfully before. The 88/89 Flyin' Illini team was the best example of that I can think of. Of course, we don't have that kind of talent, but the point remains.
Would be a nice cherry on top of a good off-season .
https://pittsburghsportsnow.com/201...-aundre-hyatt-to-make-official-visit-to-pitt/
I swear there was a rumor of the infamous Marcus Liberty either coming to pitt or transferring to Pitt. obviously, this never came true..
Dixon II. Not as bad as Majors II, but I like the description. Good way to frame Dixon’s tenure. Dixon I and Dixon II. Dixon I had the benefit of Howland. Dixon II didn’t.Here's thing. There is no way Capel loses a player to SHU or Rutgers. His recruiting is so good, I question more is this kid good enough than can we close him? Under Dixon II and Stallings, we couldn't win many recruiting battles against medicore P5 programs like SHU.
A guy going to another school, even a lesser school, does not always mean a recruiting loss. If we are stacked at a position, and another school has more playing time, or is closer to home, many reasons. It can happen.
I agree, too much is made about who goes where, when there are so many factors that go into it.In the eyes of a 17 year old kid at the moment....SHU is not a lesser school.
That’s silly.Dixon II. Not as bad as Majors II, but I like the description. Good way to frame Dixon’s tenure. Dixon I and Dixon II. Dixon I had the benefit of Howland. Dixon II didn’t.
Fun, fun team to watch. Nick Anderson was a beast, too. I remember the night Pitt beat Florida on USA Network, Illinois beat LSU, 127-100. I’ve never seen a video of that game either.I will always remember that Illinois team. Kendall Gill was awesome. Battle was a scrapper.
A guy going to another school, even a lesser school, does not always mean a recruiting loss. If we are stacked at a position, and another school has more playing time, or is closer to home, many reasons. It can happen.
In the eyes of a 17 year old kid at the moment....SHU is not a lesser school.
That’s silly.Dixon II. Not as bad as Majors II, but I like the description. Good way to frame Dixon’s tenure. Dixon I and Dixon II. Dixon I had the benefit of Howland. Dixon II didn’t.
Dixon 1 peaked 6 years into his tenure- which is a lifetime from Howland.
Then developed a whole different team with less talent to a Number 1 seed line two year later
.
Agree. But it’s about the coach. And I gotta think most 17 year olds would pick playing for capel over just about anyone that’s not a HOF lock (coach k, boeheim, izzo, etc.)In the eyes of a 17 year old kid at the moment....SHU is not a lesser school.
Was that the FL team that had a big goofy looking Center named Schintzius? He had a crazy looking mullet.Fun, fun team to watch. Nick Anderson was a beast, too. I remember the night Pitt beat Florida on USA Network, Illinois beat LSU, 127-100. I’ve never seen a video of that game either.
Was that the FL team that had a big goofy looking Center named Schintzius? He had a crazy looking mullet.
That whole team could jump out of the gym but Battle was a high-flying dunking machine. He wasn’t unreal. The rims were scared when the Flyin’ Illini walked into the gym.I will always remember that Illinois team. Kendall Gill was awesome. Battle was a scrapper.
Yes. Dwayne. Dude was like 7’2”. Don’t think he ever did anything but he bounced around the NBA for a few years.
Hyatt says Will Wade is a great guy. Ha! LSU might have two players on the team this upcoming season who have been accused of rape.
https://www.12up.com/posts/5962768-...l-team-could-have-two-players-accused-of-rape