Right on both counts. He's certainly a decent player and I wish we could have kept him.Thompson got a lot of PT at Butler , I’m pretty sure he started .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right on both counts. He's certainly a decent player and I wish we could have kept him.Thompson got a lot of PT at Butler , I’m pretty sure he started .
We'll have to see how he coaches to make that call. If he pulls a player out of the game while he's hot and replaces him with a player who's not playing well, I'd say he's at fault!How much of it would be his fault?
This past season, I blamed 40% on Barnes for being an idiot, 40% on Dixon for leaving Stallings only 2 underclassmen who were ACC-level players, and 20% on Stallings.
I know there were a lot of you who say stupid things Iike the team's result is 100% on the coach of the team no matter the hand he was dealt. So, if a widely popular coach, like Jeff Capel inherits an 0-19, loses its best 3 players, has only 5 returning players, and goes 0-19, is that 100% his fault?
I think Capel will find 1 or 2 wins but 0 wins is definitely a possibility and I hope Pitt fans are ok with that.
It took a lot of things to go wrong to accomplish an 0-19 record .
1) KS first yr he inherited a team with no bench players and two incoming freshman who turned out to be total busts and a juco who was injured .
2) the player who he planned on building his entire offense around leaves to greener pastures .
3) his highest rated recruit and future pg wants out of his LOI late in the recruiting cycle
4) his only returning player of quality gets injured and misses the entire portion of conference schedule .
5) his incoming class is filled with a lot of reaches
6) five freshman started a lot of games
None of these things other than losing returning players exists now , growth in the returning players and the new additions will make Pitt a better team next season . How many wins next yr .....stay tuned the roster isn’t done yet so why speculate .
Can’t disagree moreAnd, I will add most/all of these things were not due to bad luck or chance. IMO, they were predominantly caused by KS's inept attempt to blow everything up and start from zero rather than taking a more sane and measured approach to a rebuild.
He supposedly worked very hard to keep that first class together and then jettisoned every one of them from the program...ponderous, man.Two lackluster recruiting cycles actually.
It's all your fault.
He got a yr of seeing them play .He supposedly worked very hard to keep that first class together and then jettisoned every one of them from the program...ponderous, man.
He should have known what he was getting before convincing them to stay. He could have brought Kene in a year sooner.He got a yr of seeing them play .
There’s no comparison in the recruiting abilities of KS and JC and you can see how difficult it is at this time of yr to find quality players . The last thing Pitt needed when Stallings took over was more grad transfers . What they needed freshman and both JK and CM were rated high enough to expect them to be far better players than they were .He should have known what he was getting before convincing them to stay. He could have brought Kene in a year sooner.
He was a sitting HC recruiting at a similar level school. Our competition landed plenty of quality players during that time. KS just didn't try.There’s no comparison in the recruiting abilities of KS and JC and you can see how difficult it is at this time of yr to find quality players . The last thing Pitt needed when Stallings took over was more grad transfers . What they needed freshman and both JK and CM were rated high enough to expect them to be far better players than they were .
But ya know what WATER UNDER THE BRIDGE !