If the Bowl Committee wanted to have some fun

[Chairman Moe]

they could look to match us up with Wisconsin in the Pinstripe (although that would be dropping Wisc a spot or two), and could match Michigan up with LSU in the Outback (about the only spot where those two would be a good fit).

 

[UPitt '89]

The bowl committee only selects the teams for the playoff and for the NY6 bowls.

All the rest of the bowls are handled by the conferences and the bowls themselves, and the committee has nothing to do with them.

 

[Chairman Moe]

The bowl committee only selects the teams for the playoff and for the NY6 bowls.

All the rest of the bowls are handled by the conferences and the bowls themselves, and the committee has nothing to do with them.

Stand corrected; thanks. I guess I was thinking more along the lines of the NCAA Basketball Tournament.

So to restate, it would be fun if the Pinstripe Bowl and the Outback Bowl offered and got the games I suggested. There is probably less drama between us and Wisconsin than there is between LSU and Michigan. At the end of the day, though, both would be good games with a little "extra" attraction thrown in

 

[Rockyhound]

Wisconsin played in the Outback last year. Doesn't the Big 10 (+4) have some kind of no bowl game two years in a row rule? That's what would apparently keep the Nits from playing us in the Pinstripe. So yeah Nard v Moose Lodge would be "neat."

 

[ratking17]

4 post bed with curtains