ADVERTISEMENT

Im not disappointed this game

Mikefln

Junior
Oct 15, 2015
3,220
2,379
113
Yes, there were bad coaching calls and bad plays. What else is (k)new.

Seriously we were playing a 4th string walk on and 5th string QB. Many other back ups in. What made any of you think PN would go outside his conservative nature? He is who he is, we may want different, but that's not an option. The one time Pitt got rid of a semi successful coach, they couldn't of F'd it up worse.

I give the kids credit, many of them fought hard. I'm not against getting rid of Duzz, but anyone thinking we are going to get much better than him are delusional.
 
I'm disappointed. Even a shorthanded Pitt team should walk over a team like Toledo. If I was a neutral observer, it was an entertaining game aside from taking nearly 5 hours to complete.
 
Yes, there were bad coaching calls and bad plays. What else is (k)new.

Seriously we were playing a 4th string walk on and 5th string QB. Many other back ups in. What made any of you think PN would go outside his conservative nature? He is who he is, we may want different, but that's not an option. The one time Pitt got rid of a semi successful coach, they couldn't of F'd it up worse.

I give the kids credit, many of them fought hard. I'm not against getting rid of Duzz, but anyone thinking we are going to get much better than him are delusional.
Is or should he have been 5th string?
 
I'm disappointed. Even a shorthanded Pitt team should walk over a team like Toledo. If I was a neutral observer, it was an entertaining game aside from taking nearly 5 hours to complete.
Notre Dame lost to N. Illinois, so take your lack of understanding and superiority somewhere else.
 
Have your expectations for this team fallen that low that losing to Toledo isn't disappointing?
Again Notre Dame, a true Blue blood program who is still in the playoffs, lost to a MAC team at home.

Is it disappointing that Pitt lost to Toledo? Yes it is. But again, it was basically in Toledo's backyard, and many starters were out and we had a 4th/5th string QB playing. Not going to lose sleep over this loss. I don't take Pitt football that seriously.
 
Last edited:
Again Notre Dame, a true Blue Chip program who is still in the playoffs, lost to a MAC team at home.

Is it disappointing that Pitt lost to Toledo? Yes it is. But it's again it was basically in Toledo's backyard, and many starters were out and we had a 4th/5th string QB playing. Not going to lose sleep over this loss. I don't take Pitt football that seriously.
I don't either. But it doesn't change that it's lame to lose 6 in a row and lame to lose to a mid-level MAC team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 303vND
I'm disappointed. Even a shorthanded Pitt team should walk over a team like Toledo. If I was a neutral observer, it was an entertaining game aside from taking nearly 5 hours to complete.
“taking nearly 5 hours to complete”

Watching those OTs is painful when a timeout is called literally every play by the defense once the offense gets set for the play. After seeing that, I’d say they need to get rid of the timeouts given to each team in each OT period.
 
Again Notre Dame, a true Blue Chip program who is still in the playoffs, lost to a MAC team at home.

Is it disappointing that Pitt lost to Toledo? Yes it is. But it's again it was basically in Toledo's backyard, and many starters were out and we had a 4th/5th string QB playing. Not going to lose sleep over this loss. I don't take Pitt football that seriously.
With all due respect, if you’re a big boy, or even competent Power 4, program you don’t lose to a mid level MAC team. Hell, if you’re a competent P4 team you aren’t playing at 2pm the day after Xmas in Detroit.
 
“taking nearly 5 hours to complete”

Watching those OTs is painful when a timeout is called literally every play by the defense once the offense gets set for the play. After seeing that, I’d say they need to get rid of the timeouts given to each team in each OT period.

That's the other pathetic part of college football. No game should take more than 3 to 3.25 hours, not 4 hours or 5 hours. That's tortuous. Limit the replays that can be taken per half and shorten the clock between plays to 30 seconds. Sometimes, it's more interesting watching paint dry than watching a football game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burgh15
Yes, there were bad coaching calls and bad plays. What else is (k)new.

Seriously we were playing a 4th string walk on and 5th string QB. Many other back ups in. What made any of you think PN would go outside his conservative nature? He is who he is, we may want different, but that's not an option. The one time Pitt got rid of a semi successful coach, they couldn't of F'd it up worse.

I give the kids credit, many of them fought hard. I'm not against getting rid of Duzz, but anyone thinking we are going to get much better than him are delusional.
I stopped watching this team 3 weeks ago, not worth my time or stress. We are a MAC team now
 
With all due respect, if you’re a big boy, or even competent Power 4, program you don’t lose to a mid level MAC team. Hell, if you’re a competent P4 team you aren’t playing at 2pm the day after Xmas in Detroit.
My God, it's like some of you cannot read, if you don't remember September.

BLUE BLOOD AND NATIONAL CHAMPION CONTENDER NOTRE DAME LOST TO A 8-5 MAC TEAM.

Upsets happen, if the better team always one, there would be no need to.play actual games.
 
My God, it's like some of you cannot read, if you don't remember September.

BLUE BLOOD AND NATIONAL CHAMPION CONTENDER NOTRE DAME LOST TO A 8-5 MAC TEAM.

Upsets happen, if the better team always one, there would be no need to.play actual games.
I bet the Notre Dame fans were disappointed they lost to a MAC team.
 
My God, it's like some of you cannot read, if you don't remember September.

BLUE BLOOD AND NATIONAL CHAMPION CONTENDER NOTRE DAME LOST TO A 8-5 MAC TEAM.

Upsets happen, if the better team always one, there would be no need to.play actual games.

Except the better team actually did win yesterday. Pitt is not as talented, as fast, or as well coached as Toledo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 303vND
Narduzzi lost this game by not starting Dugger and then the boneheaded trick play followed up by the gutless decision to kick a FG from the one. How could PN possibly see Lynch’s arm and lack of mobility and think he was a better choice than Dugger?
This is the most glaring issue for me - I guess they didn't learn anything from last year's Jurkovec debacle - there's one common denominator.
 
My God, it's like some of you cannot read, if you don't remember September.

BLUE BLOOD AND NATIONAL CHAMPION CONTENDER NOTRE DAME LOST TO A 8-5 MAC TEAM.

Upsets happen, if the better team always one, there would be no need to.play actual games.
Everyone can read. Everyone remembers.

The difference is:

How has Notre Dame responded since that embarrassing loss?

We stack embarrassments upon embarrassments like stacking legos.
 
For everyone here trashing Toledo, just a reminder that this same Toledo Team destroyed(think the Score was around 42-17) Mississippi State in their own Crib earlier this Season. Mississippi State might be the Worst Team in the SEC, but they have more Talent on their Roster(or should based on NIL Money, along with the Television Contract Money paid out to the PIG 2 Conferences) than Toledo. Some people here can trash the MAC Teams, but as was already mentioned in this Thread, Northern Illinois beat Notre Dame this Season( and in their own Crib with Touchdown Jesus watching:eek:), and think it was Bowling Green, who played well despite losing versus Ped State in Creepy Valley back in September. Actually, I recall several years going back to around 2000, or the 1990s, when 2-3 MAC Teams beat FAT 10 Teams each September. I recall the Terrible PITT Loss at Toledo(think was a Friday Nite Game so had a bad feeling at the time), that occurred during the Early-Mid 2000s(Forget if Walt or Wanny was the HC for that Upset Loss).

Once PITT’s Offensive Line was decimated by injuries, I was expecting their Season to end badly, although unfortunately they blew the opportunity to upset Clemson by giving up that Long TD Run by their QB, and Virginia was a Bad Loss, despite the injuries to several PITT Players. I was expecting Losses at SMU & Louisville, but by the time their Final Game was played at Boston College, I figured they were done and would also lose that Game.

With Injuries(and Toledo also was missing a few of their Better Players, including one, who was ejected from this Game), Transfers through the Portal, and their Best WR sitting out this Meaningless Bowl Game(which was the right decision for any Player expecting to be selected in the next NFL Draft), I just watched PITT in this Bowl Game as if it would have been a Spring Game to see some potential for a few of the Younger Players on the Team. These Bowl Games are just Exhibition Games, and was the case since the Playoffs started 10 Years ago, and even more so this Year, now that there are 12 Teams in the Playoffs(and apparently will be expanding to 14 Teams soon, and eventually most likely 16 Teams).

Speaking of the Playoffs, it was stupid not to Reseed the Remaining Teams after the 1st Round Games, as now an Undefeated Oregon has to play tOSU, while Ped State gets to play an Easier Opponent in Boise State, although they possibly could still lose that Game, as Milkdud’s Record versus Top 10 Teams is Terrible, but even Milkdud and his Defensive Coordinator should be able to figure out how to emphasize shutting down the RB for Boise State. Although, if Ped State loses to Boise State, it will be fun watching The CULT turn on Milkdud again, especially with their Talent Advantage. Milkdud might be a Terrible Game Day Coach when playing Top 10 Teams, but he recruits well enough to beat most of the Crap Teams in the FAT 10.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Black_Man_Panther
OL was also getting handled early in the season.

There’s a reason why the hype for Holstein reached such a fever pitch early in the season.

It wasn’t because the OL was opening up holes and giving him all day to throw.

Agree. This notion that Branson Taylor, with his Big Blue Ox, is somehow worth 3-4 more wins has reached some pretty funny heights .
 
Speaking of the Playoffs, it was stupid not to Reseed the Remaining Teams after the 1st Round Games, as now an Undefeated Oregon has to play tOSU, while Ped State gets to play an Easier Opponent in Boise State
What was there to reseed? All of the favorites won. If the #12 won, yeah, I complete agree to reseed like the NFL does. The first round went chalk.
 
What was there to reseed? All of the favorites won. If the #12 won, yeah, I complete agree to reseed like the NFL does. The first round went chalk.


They could reseed based on what the actual rankings were, as opposed to what the teams got seeded originally based on winning their conference.

The eight remaining teams were ranked:

1) Oregon
2) Georgia
3) Texas
4) nitters
5) Notre Dame
6) Ohio State
9) Boise State
12) Arizona State

So the second round matchups would be Oregon - Arizona State, Georgia - Boise, Texas - Ohio State, and the nitters - Notre Dame.

In fact I would expect something like that to eventually happen, as long as they continue to give the top four conference winners a first round bye.
 
They will change the seeding in 2026, it’s almost a forgone conclusion.
 
They could reseed based on what the actual rankings were, as opposed to what the teams got seeded originally based on winning their conference.

The eight remaining teams were ranked:

1) Oregon
2) Georgia
3) Texas
4) nitters
5) Notre Dame
6) Ohio State
9) Boise State
12) Arizona State

So the second round matchups would be Oregon - Arizona State, Georgia - Boise, Texas - Ohio State, and the nitters - Notre Dame.

In fact I would expect something like that to eventually happen, as long as they continue to give the top four conference winners a first round bye.
If they were going to do that they need to use that method in the first place. It doesn't make sense to chance formulas halfway through the playoffs.
 
If they were going to do that they need to use that method in the first place. It doesn't make sense to chance formulas halfway through the playoffs.


Why not? If you are going to have byes for conference champions, what difference does it make if you give teams byes and then seed the second round by rankings or if you do what they are doing this season? As long as you let everyone know ahead of time what the rules are, what difference do the specifics make?
 
I still think there should be some type of format where these bowl games become the spring game for two teams the following year.

Would create total interest in the 12 team playoff, would open more neutral sites for the playoff games and would be a TV ratings upgrade with little in the way of sports competition in early April.

Stats...wins....losses...none of it counts. It becomes a Spring game against a different jersey.

And for the "its a reward for the players" crowd, choose one of my ass cheeks to kiss. One is blue. One is gold.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT