ADVERTISEMENT

Interesting dilemma

PantherRich1

Freshman
Gold Member
Aug 4, 2011
1,044
979
113
Go back a few years and Pitt was making the sweet 16 almost every year and winning with under recruited, 3 and 4 year players. People weren't happy. So Dixon starts swinging for the fences more with top recruits and missing. Less time spent on the diamonds in the rough. The purpose of this recruiting switch was to try to get to the next level. Instead the program has taken a step back.

So what do people prefer, the consistent sweet 16 team maxed out there or the attempt to get those big recruits with the hope of getting to the 'next' level. Tough one because the later hasn't worked out well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back