ADVERTISEMENT

Is Bryce Golden Shrinking?

I also saw Nas listed at 6ft 5in yet he wasn't as tall as some of our shorter guards it appeared when he stood next to them during timeouts. I think he may have been 6ft 3in tops. Also not sure if Ramon was over 6ft tall without the hair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiehardPanther
Ill take Bryce Golden at 6'7" or 6'9". A forward tandem including him and Stevenson has a lot of promise.

Me, too. In addition to his outside shooting, his videos show him being a more developed inside banger and back-to-the-basket player than of the bigs currently on the roster. In comparison to top teams in the ACC, that may not be saying much; however, it's a dimension much needed with this group.
 
Ill take Bryce Golden at 6'7" or 6'9". A forward tandem including him and Stevenson has a lot of promise.
I have seen Golden twice on TV. I don't know how much scoring or how many rebounds he will secure as a freshman, but he is stronger than any big we currently have. He will hold his position on defense, block out rebounding and carve out space in the paint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiehardPanther
I have seen Golden twice on TV. I don't know how much scoring or how many rebounds he will secure as a freshman, but he is stronger than any big we currently have. He will hold his position on defense, block out rebounding and carve out space in the paint.

I've only seen him once, and I hope you're right, but I wouldn't say he's stronger that Stevenson. Not sure what can be learned watching one high school game anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockypanther
Jerome Lane, Brian Shorter, and DeJuan Blair were all right around 6-5, and 3 of the best rebounders we have ever had. Height isn’t the most important thing when it comes to rebounding.

Note - I only go back to the mid-80’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRPITT and Fsgolfdr
I've only seen him once, and I hope you're right, but I wouldn't say he's stronger that Stevenson. Not sure what can be learned watching one high school game anyway.
Don’t think many D1 freshman are stronger than Stevenson
 
I've only seen him once, and I hope you're right, but I wouldn't say he's stronger that Stevenson. Not sure what can be learned watching one high school game anyway.
Did not mean to include Stevenson - I don't (and I think Stevenson doesn't) consider him a big. I know he has to play like one for us.
 
Did not mean to include Stevenson - I don't (and I think Stevenson doesn't) consider him a big. I know he has to play like one for us.

Stevenson was quoted as an incoming recruit that he viewed himself as more of a SF than a PF. Unfortunately he hasn't had much of a chance to show it given our lack of size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary2
Blair was 6-5 1/2 when he measured for the combine.

Chevy Troutman told me he is actually 6-5.

Very true. Reach (wingspan) and width are more important than actual height. Some shorter players have enough extra long reach and width/bulk to effectively perform equivalently to players who are taller in height. Charles Barkley also comes to mind as being in this category. For Pitt you can add Ontario Lett to the list headed by Blair.
 
Very true. Reach (wingspan) and width are more important than actual height. Some shorter players have enough extra long reach and width/bulk to effectively perform equivalently to players who are taller in height. Charles Barkley also comes to mind as being in this category. For Pitt you can add Ontario Lett to the list headed by Blair.
Lett was 6-4 1/2
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT