The team will need to win at least 10 for him to be in the conversation.Not worried. James WILL win the Heisman in '16.
What's funny is look at the Big 12 passing stats from 2003. Jason White was not the leader in quite a few categories, in his own conference!The team will need to win at least 10 for him to be in the conversation.
Sadly, the Heisman voters only consider players on ranked teams anymore. Ask Ron Cook, Bob Smizik and their votes for Jason White over Larry Fitzgerald. Cook even said that Oklahoma's 13-0 record compared to Pitt's 9-4 record was the tie-breaker for him. Which is stupid logic. The award is supposed to go to the best player, not the best player on the best team.
The team will need to win at least 10 for him to be in the conversation.
Sadly, the Heisman voters only consider players on ranked teams anymore. Ask Ron Cook, Bob Smizik and their votes for Jason White over Larry Fitzgerald. Cook even said that Oklahoma's 13-0 record compared to Pitt's 9-4 record was the tie-breaker for him. Which is stupid logic. The award is supposed to go to the best player, not the best player on the best team.
Hahahaha. You know at some point in the argument the following would happen. Cook: "How can you seriously say Pepsi is better? Did Joe Paterno wear Pepsi bottle glasses? No, he wore Coke bottle glasses? Pepsi has been irrelevant for years. Coke has 107,000 consumers every week."Yeah ask those two (Dumb and dumber). They shouldn't even be allowed to vote for coke versus pepsi!