ADVERTISEMENT

Jamie Dixon - Andy Reid

pitt90seven

All P I T T !
Gold Member
Dec 5, 2013
33,665
36,640
113
i see them as pretty similar: both are pretty good coaches - you probably aren't going to have a truly bad season with them. or if so, it's infrequent. and they can beat very good teams. but they just never get it done as far as truly making a run. they both get a lot of out of some of their players.

so andy has a nice run of success in philly but ultimately, the fans get sick of 10/6 and first round losses in the playoffs. eventually, logic goes out the window of how the eagles were before and fans want something better. andy goes immediately to a crap team and makes them relevant. but relevant is all the chiefs will ever be under andy. he's a 10-6 guy.

that's where we are with jamie - he is who he is. he's not going to change much after 13 years. the reality is he should go to a school like BC who just can't get it together and make them relevant; get them in the conversation where they haven't been for years. maybe even an SEC school that wants to have a decent BB program (arkansas, bama, etc). we could all think of loads of schools who would be very happy to have him, and should take him in a heartbeat - schools that aren't getting the young up and comer - schools who, being realistic, aren't ever winning a nat'l title but getting a few thousand more butts in the seats wouldn't be a bad thing. but pitt fans are now like eagles fans - we know what we're getting every year and we're kind of tired of fully knowing how the season is going to go.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back