ADVERTISEMENT

Jon Solomon National College Football Writer Congress NCAA Bill Seeking President Commission, LINK!

CaptainSidneyReilly

Chancellor
Dec 25, 2006
20,974
2,630
113
It has been my opinion, that the President and congress may be stepping in on College Athletics, looks like it still has some legs, although not sure how fast it can move on these last years as President Obama becomes a Lame Duck. It will interesting to see if Congressman Dent is one of the ones holding up the Penn State Clery Act Report over months past due?


Congress members reintroduce NCAA bill seeking presidential commission

WASHINGTON -- College sports and the federal government blended together again Thursday when four members of Congress reintroduced legislation designed to change the NCAA.

Reps. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) and Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio) previously proposed in 2013 the NCAA Accountability Act to address health and safety, scholarship lengths and due process for athletes. They are reintroducing the bill to include the idea of a Presidential Commission of Intercollegiate Athletics while adding Reps. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.) and John Katko (R-N.Y.) as co-sponsors.

The presidential commission, introduced by Rush in a bill last January after efforts by retiring Rep. Jim Moran, would allow Congress to examine college sports issues such as the education of athletes, how the sports are financed, health and safety, and due process in infractions cases. The 17-person commission could make recommendations to the White House and Congress.

Rush said the bill is aimed at the “abysmal cesspool that's called college athletics in America.”

“In my mind, the NCAA is the last plantation in America,” Rush said. “Certainly it takes the layman's capital and talent and the skills of its participants under the guise of being amateurs, promises them education, but then it exploits their labor -- without pay I might add … It should be the National Cabal of Collegiate Athletes.”

Putting the outlandish rhetoric aside, it's not clear how much support in Congress there is for Thursday's bill. Similar scrutiny in the past has led to hearings and some changes by the NCAA and Congress, although not actual legislation.

"People will say why is Congress engaged in college sports?" Beatty said. "Talk is not enough."

Dent said the co-sponsors will push for hearings and believes there are more Congressional members who want a presidential commission. "I think there's a lot of momentum out there because I think there's a general sense that the NCAA is incapable of reforming itself," Dent said.

Part of the bill aims to address four-year scholarships. The NCAA passed legislation last January that the association has said would prevent athletes from having their scholarships non-renewed due to athletic reasons.

NCAA spokeswoman Stacey Osburn said the association has no comment on the bill. Last December, NCAA president Mark Emmert told CBSSports.com that if a presidential commission is established, “I hope it's focused and meaningful and that it's not done for political reasons, but because people are generally interested in the issue of college sports.”

In 2014, the NCAA spent $580,000 on Congressional lobbying -- a small amount by D.C. standards, but a total that exceeded what the association spent on lobbying combined from 2011 to 2013. The NCAA has spent $110,000 on lobbying in 2015 as of April 20, according to OpenSecrets.org. Records show that lobbyists for the Big 12, North Carolina State and Kent State have been working on the presidential commission legislation.

“No one is saying the NCAA should be disbanded,” Katko said. “But it certainly wouldn't hurt for the NCAA to have someone take a fresh look at how they're handling things.”

Katko's district is home to Syracuse University, which was recently hit with major NCAA violations in men's basketball. Katko criticized the NCAA for not having a consistent enforcement process.

“It's clear the NCAA went out of its way to humiliate and punish Jim Boeheim,” Katko said.

The reintroduction of the bill comes at a time when college sports is debating congressional intervention. Given the pressure facing the NCAA due to litigation, some people want an antitrust exemption for the NCAA that would provide some control of college sports to the government in exchange for protection from antitrust law.

The NCAA has appealed a decision in the Ed O'Bannon case that would allow football and men's basketball players to be paid for use of their names, images and likenesses at an amount the NCAA could cap at no less than $5,000 per year. In the coming months, a class certification hearing will be held on sports attorney Jeffrey Kessler's Martin Jenkins lawsuit that seeks a free market for players to be paid.

“I think it would be very difficult for the Congress to grant an antitrust exemption,” Dent said. “I think it would be a very high bar.”

Rush's previous bill regarding a presidential commission included examining the possibility of athletes being paid for commercial use of their names, images and likenesses. Rush said he believes the NCAA is “coming very, very close” to violating antitrust laws, if it's not doing so already.

Dent said nothing in the latest legislation prohibits “stipends” for athletes. “We're more or less silent on that,” he said.
LINK:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...bers-reintroduce-ncaa-bill-seeking-commission

 
LOL. Seriously the collegiate athlete needs to be protected from a "plantation" system. Full scholarships and cost of attendance benefits. I feel so bad for these kids. Yep, this should be the priority for the country. Bobby Rush? Was he one of the 1960s radicals?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
The NCAA definitely is not willing (won't say not capable) of policing. That's because the NCAA is not an independent regulator. It takes ultimate direction from its members, which are fine with the cess pool.

The shameful shirking of discipline for the Penn State boy rape scandal all by itself should have led Congress to step in. But as indicated, there are plenty of others. UNC is just the latest that everyone can see is being positioned as not even a tap on the wrist. Reading the latest announcement of intent to eventually possibly perhaps investigate UNC by the NCAA this week, the main focus of the allegations seem to be on ... shock ... women's basketball. Which can then position it to be the sport that takes the brunt of 'discipline'. Somehow, the men's basketball and football teams will be nexr to unscathed. Or, as PSU established, 'sanctions' will be named, the school will launch bogus lawsuits, the NCAA will wipe them out, media will ignore conveniently.

Congress dam well should step in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Are you the sheriff from the movie Selma? I didn't realize being an advocate for civil rights meant you were a radical.....DICK

Black Panther or not, fighting for equal rights, does not equal "radical"
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
The mere fact that the two National Championship Semifinals are being played this year on New Year's Eve because the Rose Bowl would not relinquish its New Year's Day spot is all that you need to know about the impotence of the NCAA or any governing entity in college sports. The Rose Bowl is the "grand daddy of them all". I know this, "grand daddies" are usually the closest to death of any group of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
LOL. Seriously the collegiate athlete needs to be protected from a "plantation" system. Full scholarships and cost of attendance benefits. I feel so bad for these kids. Yep, this should be the priority for the country. Bobby Rush? Was he one of the 1960s radicals?

I hear you, but when Billions are being made and people not playing are making millions such as Former Athletic Director Pederson's & Coach's Buyouts for example, then Social Justice Arguments will be made?

In my opinion will spread in the future election cycle not just on medical Non-Profits such as UPMC, but NCAA, and my experience a grab for more Power??

I am not saying it is right, wrong, or will happen, but it is going to continue to become a Social & Political issue in Congress and and some States???

This is one of the reasons I predict there will be a "FOR PROFIT" College Football League coming to the future in CFB, as well as Taxing Non-Profits such as UPMC!


I also think this is some fallout from the Penn State, USC, Miami, and UNC Scandals and Sanctions, as well as, Concussions Research, Players Rights Compensation, and Unionization!

We shall see?
o_O
 
The mere fact that the two National Championship Semifinals are being played this year on New Year's Eve because the Rose Bowl would not relinquish its New Year's Day spot is all that you need to know about the impotence of the NCAA or any governing entity in college sports. The Rose Bowl is the "grand daddy of them all". I know this, "grand daddies" are usually the closest to death of any group of people.

Very astute observation, as usual, and good insight, again great contrubutions to the Lair Board too!
 
The NCAA definitely is not willing (won't say not capable) of policing. That's because the NCAA is not an independent regulator. It takes ultimate direction from its members, which are fine with the cess pool.

The shameful shirking of discipline for the Penn State boy rape scandal all by itself should have led Congress to step in. But as indicated, there are plenty of others. UNC is just the latest that everyone can see is being positioned as not even a tap on the wrist. Reading the latest announcement of intent to eventually possibly perhaps investigate UNC by the NCAA this week, the main focus of the allegations seem to be on ... shock ... women's basketball. Which can then position it to be the sport that takes the brunt of 'discipline'. Somehow, the men's basketball and football teams will be nexr to unscathed. Or, as PSU established, 'sanctions' will be named, the school will launch bogus lawsuits, the NCAA will wipe them out, media will ignore conveniently.

Congress dam well should step in.

It is going to happen sooner or later!:cool:
 
So a congressman from Syracuse pissed of at the NCAA because they sanctioned Syracuse and a congressman from PA pissed off at the NCAA because they sanctioned the nitters want Congress to look into the NCAA. Why am I not surprised?
 
So a congressman from Syracuse pissed of at the NCAA because they sanctioned Syracuse and a congressman from PA pissed off at the NCAA because they sanctioned the nitters want Congress to look into the NCAA. Why am I not surprised?

At least this is not self serving. So they are pissed at the NCAA for "governing" or "not governing" its cess pool?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Hey, there are certainly things wrong with the NCAA, changes that they ought to make and indeed should have made years ago. But that isn't what it's about for these guys. For them this is all about going after the organization that punished their school for, in one instance, getting caught cheating and in the other instance for being ground zero for the biggest scandal in the history of college athletics. If the NCAA had allowed Syracuse to skate the congressman from New York wouldn't give a crap about this. And we all know that the nitters feel that the NCAA punishing them was far worse than JoePa and the stooges covering up for a child molester for over a decade. That's all I'm saying, consider the source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Thanks for the correction. So the major bowls are controlled by the Playoff Committee, right. NCAA has no power over them as a prior poster assumes?
 
Thanks for the correction. So the major bowls are controlled by the Playoff Committee, right. NCAA has no power over them as a prior poster assumes?

It is my understanding, the NCAA has Total Contract Authority including TV Contracts and Oversight on March Madness Basketball and many Minor and Olympic Sports! But in Football The Five Power Conferences and Playoff Committee of Other Members Control the Playoffs and in turn intertwined within the Bowls, and thus, absorbed the BCS Organization structure..

Also, part of the Article above when they said, BYU made a mistake by going Independent and only got the same share Army & Navy got from the Bowl Money and TV Money and less than a $1 million, when they could have gotten more if associated with a Conference Bowl Share and TV Package. They said BYU goal is to be in a Power Conference in 3 Years?
Navy is joining the AAC this year, so they will get more now from Bowl Shares and TV Package now!

EXCERPT LINK:
2) BYU. A well-intentioned decision at the time to take football independent has largely backfired. While BYU gained exposure by making its own deal with ESPN, it got stuck in FBS no-man's-land when the CFP replaced the BCS. Whereas Mountain West champ Boise State made the Fiesta Bowl last year with two losses, BYU, not considered part of the Group of 5, needs to finish in the top 10 to have any chance at a major bowl. It's also missing out on lucrative CFP revenue. The MWC distributed $23.5 million to members this year; BYU split less than $1 million with Army and Navy. The situation is dire enough that coach Bronco Mendenhall recently said joining a Power 5 league "has to happen within three [years]." He better hope the Big 12 keeps missing the playoff.

Finally, each Power Conference & Other Non-Power Conferences has a Contracts with various Bowls and that is how the money is shared as well, and not through BCS anymore. The BCS was set up to start seeking to match up the Top Two Teams whne there was no Playoff. now The Playoff Committee does it and the remainder of the Bowls are set by Conference Contracts that can change over time!


Here is a LINK:
College Football Playoff set to replace Bowl Championship Series in 2014:
PASADENA, Calif. -- The Bowl Championship Series will be replaced by the College Football Playoff. The BCS conference commissioners announced the name of the new postseason system that starts in 2014 on Tuesday, the first of three days of meetings at a resort hotel in the Rose Bowl's backyard.
They also will choose the remaining three sites for the six-bowl semifinal rotation in the new system and the site of the first championship game to be held Jan. 12, 2015, this week. The website www.collegefootballplayoff.com is already up and running and allowing fans to vote on a new logo. It also has a Twitter handle. ''We've decided to call the playoff what it is - the College Football Playoff,'' BCS executive director Bill Hancock, who will hold the same position in the playoff system, said in a statement.
Selection Committee Responsibilities

Rank the top 25 teams and assign the top four to semifinal sites.
Assign teams to New Year’s bowls.
Create competitive matchups.
Attempt to avoid rematches of regular-season games and repeat appearances in specific bowls.
Consider geography.
LINKS:
http://www.ncaa.com/news/football/a...off-set-replace-bowl-championship-series-2014

Chronology
http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/chronology
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT