First of all if it's so much harder to recruit to MSU why have they consistently had better overall team talent than Pitt for the past 25 years or so?
Swcond
Oh, is that what makes a college football coaching job attractive?
And here all this time I thought it was salary, institutional and private support for football, facilities and exposure, in that order. All of which MSU has exponentially more of than Pitt.
Not to mention-this program has been down in the dumps,for the better part of 30'years. MSU is 65-16 the last 6 years with 3 Big 10 championships, a CFB playoff appearance, a couple of Top 5 finishes, and some of the most memorable and exciting wins in recent CFB history.
But hey, Pitt has had some amazing individual college and pro players over the past 50 years, and that string of NCs back in the 20s amd 30s sure was awesome. I'm sure stuff that would trump everything else when it comes to the desirability of a coaching job.
Not sure what world some of you guys live in out there, whether you really believe what you post or you're just such stone cold homers you can't see the rest of the world outside of Pitt through your Pitt-colored glasses.
Also, anyone who thinks East Lansing and the MSU campus are a"dumps" has never been there.