Just left the game and listening to the post game show. Narduzzi promised the win at half time, then Pitt came out and punched the #2 team in the face all second half.
H2P
H2P
To paraphrase, he said something to the effect that Pitt did it in Morgantown; last year in South Carolina; and here today (beat the number two team).Just left the game and listening to the post game show. Narduzzi promised the win at half time, then Pitt came out and punched the #2 team in the face all second half.
H2P
To paraphrase, he said something to the effect that Pitt did it in Morgantown; last year in South Carolina; and here today (beat the number two team).
That is either bad@ss or stupid. And, since we won, it is bad@ss
NCPN needs to put together a program and game plan that works every game not just one or two highligh games.
He also need to eliminate "HIS" unforced errors like playing Brown, and DiNucci, leaving Pickett the best Pitt QB sitting the bench.
HCPN also needs to instill more dicipline into the program so players aren't dismissed, suspended, or injured with non football inguries!
When he gets this done he'll be an acceptable coach !
Remember he lost to UNC a one win team, Cuse a program we dominate, NC State, V Tech both winnable games!
This is a step forward but HCPN has alot to prove to be called a successful head coach!
\
Other than the games against FCS programs I can't remember a game where they didn't play hard, maybe miami last year but I think that was more of a issue with how the game went not how hard they played. They have also proven they can game plan and play well against top teams. I thought the game plan against psu x2, clemson, miami and VT were very good. Just had some games were breaks went against us against SU(two roughing penalties on third down which ended up being TD's) and NC( we know all about that one!) VT was tough because of the way we lost and we probably should have won at that point but they are a pretty tough team on the road so really it was a good job to be in that spot. Need to find a WRVery easy for a coach to lose a 4 win team - he didn't. They played hard for him today. I don't know what that says about his coaching, but you can see what he's building. He's turning the D around. He seems to have a nice eye for QB's...which has haunted this program in recent memory. I'll be interested to see what the influx of young talent on offense brings, but I wouldn't trade this guy for the realistic options out there
Just left the game and listening to the post game show. Narduzzi promised the win at half time, then Pitt came out and punched the #2 team in the face all second half.
H2P
And beating teams Pitt is suppose to beat, like northwestern, North Carolina to name a coupleJust need to work on the consistency and winning the close games against the UNC’s/Virginia Tech’s now.
To be fair, he said this in response to being asked "what did you tell your team at halftime?" So it makes a great sound bite now and looks like he predicted it but he was relaying what he told the team at half, so he shouldn't have been blamed if it didn't work out.That is either bad@ss or stupid. And, since we won, it is bad@ss
And beating teams Pitt is suppose to beat, like northwestern, North Carolina to name a couple
To be fair, he said this in response to being asked "what did you tell your team at halftime?" So it makes a great sound bite now and looks like he predicted it but he was relaying what he told the team at half, so he shouldn't have been blamed if it didn't work out.
Huh? Can you read? I was defending his comments. He was asked a question and answered the question. It wasn't potentially stupid because it wasn't an impulsive prediction. Did you even watch the game?Oh really?? Geez man, you are negative aren't you. He was fired up and he talked a bit impulsively. It was awesome. He probably should not have said it. If it was franklin I would have rolled my eyes. But no one can say our team wasn't fired up after halftime. He did a great job
Huh? Can you read? I was defending his comments. He was asked a question and answered the question. It wasn't potentially stupid because it wasn't an impulsive prediction. Did you even watch the game?
It is almost unbelievable how dumb you are.
WTF are you talking about? There was nothing close to being negative. You attacked HCPN and said his comments were potentially (as if it hinged on the outcome) "stupid". I defended HCPN. It was clear as day. If someone reads what I posted and thinks it was negative to say our coach was not saying something "stupid" then that person is a moron. Plain and simple.Classy. As usual. And you are always negative, as you just showed again.