ADVERTISEMENT

Narduzzi should be on the hot seat

Back to the OP s idiotic statement, while Narduzzi certainly isn't beyond criticism, and I'm afraid his ceiling isn't going to satisfy most Pitt fans, he ain't going to be fired in year 2, especially after signing an extension after year 1.

Some of you are just dumb, dumb, dumb.

Btw, Mike MacIntyre is in his fourth year at Colorado. He went 4-8, 2-10, and 4-9 in his first three seasons there.
 
Pederson wouldn't let wanny spend more money on assistants, but magically wanted a top 10 football team. UConn loss was in the early years when he struggled, but I thought wanny did a more than solid job here.

There's no question Barnes is more committted to making a winning football team. I'm just pointing out that I think wanny was a much better coach than people gave him credit for. Only coach since the 80s to win 10 games so he did something right.
That Uconn loss I was referring to happened in 2010. Not quite the early years.
And unlike Long and Pederson, Barnes has the luxury of ACC television money.
 
Anyone who understands anything about anything knows why you don't talk hot seat and anyone talking hot seat is just too damn stupid to talk with
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainMurphy
That Uconn loss I was referring to happened in 2010. Not quite the early years.
And unlike Long and Pederson, Barnes has the luxury of ACC television money.
Oh I thought you meant '06 when UConn won on the 2 point conversion. Yeah that '10 loss, no excuse. Win that and we waltz into the bcs even after getting clobbered by wvu.

I have a hard time defending a guy though who fired someone who was never going to leave, then continuously botched hires after. But I do see your point.
 
You just proved how dumb you are. You clearly haven't watched them because they do have many FBS transfers. And they're not scrub leftovers like the guys chryst and graham left for narduzzi.

If he starts getting better recruits in the next couple years, you, me, and everyone else will seriously look back at now and laugh at what little talent we really have.

Yes, they transfer to DII schools for a reason. You actually never qualified that it was only the secondary that wouldn't see the field at IUP, but I'll go with that. IUP gave 243 yard through the air to Mercyhurst today. They gave up 332 in the air and 5 passing TDs to Seton Hill. They gave up 308 yards passing to Cal...that's Cal PA not Cal Berkeley...I have to specify that because you seem to be confused by the concept that Division II is not the Division that Pitt plays in. IUP ranks 104th in pass defense in Division 2. And they aren't playing against receivers and QBs with the size, skills, speed and athletic ability that Pitt's are.

I get that you are upset because our secondary sucks, and it does, but your hyperbole is over the top and it ruins your argument against the original stupid post. Narduzzi is not on the hot seat and Pitt would not improve if we swapped secondaries (or any set of players) with any PSAC school. It is an absolutely idiotic thought, it is even dumber to type it out on a public forum for everyone to see, and is beyond pathetic to continue to defend it.
 
Last edited:
Yes, they transfer to DII schools for a reason. You actually never qualified that it was only the secondary that wouldn't see the field at IUP, but I'll go with that. IUP gave 243 yard through the air to Mercyhurst today. They gave up 332 in the air and 5 passing TDs to Seton Hill. They gave up 308 yards passing to Cal...that's Cal PA not Cal Berkeley...I have to specify that because you seem to be confused by the concept that Division II is not the Division that Pitt plays in. IUP ranks 104th in pass defense in Division 2. And they aren't playing against receivers and QBs with the size, skills, speed and athletic ability that Pitt's are.

I get that you are upset because our secondary sucks, and it does, but your hyperbole is over the top and it ruins your argument against the original stupid post. Narduzzi is not on the hot seat and Pitt would not improve if we swapped secondaries (or any set of players) with any PSAC school. It is an absolutely idiotic thought, it is even dumber to type it out on a public forum for everyone to see, and is beyond pathetic to continue to defend it.
now you're just picking points to make your argument. What about the run defense? How bout how good cal u actually is? Caprara and galambos are maybe d2 players at best. You are blind to think otherwise.

Even going with the secondary. Everyone thinks Maddox is so bad, I know he isn't that bad. It's obvious to me he's d1 level talent, he just can't defend good receivers. Most of the other d-backs though, not even close.

It is nowhere near an exaggeration, our talent is that bad. Just look at how many guys nobody wanted. The reason is because they don't belong here. Obviously I don't think IUP or whoever else's secondary would do better here, I'm just saying certain individual players... take them and put them at a lower level, and they are still bad. There is no way around it.

Terrish Webb never has the slightest clue what he's doing. If he went to cal u, he's not gonna get better or smarter just because the opposition isn't as hard. The kid just isn't good enough.

I agree with you on points. But it is not an overstatement at all how bad some of these players are.
 
now you're just picking points to make your argument. What about the run defense? How bout how good cal u actually is? Caprara and galambos are maybe d2 players at best. You are blind to think otherwise.

Even going with the secondary. Everyone thinks Maddox is so bad, I know he isn't that bad. It's obvious to me he's d1 level talent, he just can't defend good receivers. Most of the other d-backs though, not even close.

It is nowhere near an exaggeration, our talent is that bad. Just look at how many guys nobody wanted. The reason is because they don't belong here. Obviously I don't think IUP or whoever else's secondary would do better here, I'm just saying certain individual players... take them and put them at a lower level, and they are still bad. There is no way around it.

Terrish Webb never has the slightest clue what he's doing. If he went to cal u, he's not gonna get better or smarter just because the opposition isn't as hard. The kid just isn't good enough.

I agree with you on points. But it is not an overstatement at all how bad some of these players are.

You should just stop.
 
Narduzzi is looking a lot like Franklin so far. Beating all the underdogs, no WTF games, no wins against good teams (and no I dont think PSU is any good). Franklin seems to have turned the corner, his recruiting is unbelievable and are going to the Orange Bowl if they win the next 4. The jury is out on Narduzzi.
 
Lets not get carried away. Chris Wuestner transferred there and is a star. Our team is mostly Lower P5/MAC level players. Still better than 1AA or D2. Our talent is closer to Akron than Miami.
Overall yes I agree. We have some star players, we have the MAC talent as well. I'm just talking about a handful of guys who just flat out aren't good football players. And we do have some of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
Narduzzi is looking a lot like Franklin so far. Beating all the underdogs, no WTF games, no wins against good teams (and no I dont think PSU is any good). Franklin seems to have turned the corner, his recruiting is unbelievable and are going to the Orange Bowl if they win the next 4. The jury is out on Narduzzi.


Ohio State was a good win though.
 
He's ticking all the boxes for a poor head coach. Mentally unstable. Teams poorly prepared. Hires bad assistants. Can't/won't make necessary adjustments. Average at best recruiter.

Color me not impressed two years in.
Coaches coming into a bad situation need 4 years. Next year was supposed to be Franklin's judgement year but he has us a year ahead of schedule. But early on when the team was struggling with injuries, even if the season turned south, he was getting another year no matter what some reporters were saying. every coach deserves 4 years, unfortunately for you guys, year 3 is shaping up to be much worse than this year with the QB situation next year.
 
He's ticking all the boxes for a poor head coach. Mentally unstable. Teams poorly prepared. Hires bad assistants. Can't/won't make necessary adjustments. Average at best recruiter.

Color me not impressed two years in.
Yep. That's what we need: building a team with yet another coaching change. Blow another recruiting class to smithereens. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pittx9
You should go cheer for IUP with all their Power 5 FBS talent.

There is so much stupid on these boards, I have no idea why anyone subjects themselves to it. That goes for me too. I guess I am really dumb.
These past few weeks have really shown me where the publisher's heart truly lies. I wish there were other options for reasonable people to discuss Pitt, but this site is becoming as bad as Scout. But if you post something negative about the sex scandal, you better believe Peak removes that post quick..can't upset his buddies. However, it's free reign for Pitt and PSU trolls to create new handles and trash our program, over and over and over. I'm done.
 
If we are here in year four, let's talk hot seat. I mean, Paul Chryst's job was safe after year three and his results were worse.
 
These past few weeks have really shown me where the publisher's heart truly lies. I wish there were other options for reasonable people to discuss Pitt, but this site is becoming as bad as Scout. But if you post something negative about the sex scandal, you better believe Peak removes that post quick..can't upset his buddies. However, it's free reign for Pitt and PSU trolls to create new handles and trash our program, over and over and over. I'm done.

That is true. This board and Scout are a cesspool. The amount of postings are way down. I come on here rarely and am just tired of the trolls. I'm out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireballZ
That is true. This board and Scout are a cesspool. The amount of postings are way down. I come on here rarely and am just tired of the trolls. I'm out.

Its sad because the good posters here are really good and have been here for years. But the trolls have overrun the place. Ignore button is getting worn out lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany1997
Coaches coming into a bad situation need 4 years. Next year was supposed to be Franklin's judgement year but he has us a year ahead of schedule. But early on when the team was struggling with injuries, even if the season turned south, he was getting another year no matter what some reporters were saying. every coach deserves 4 years, unfortunately for you guys, year 3 is shaping up to be much worse than this year with the QB situation next year.
There hasn't been a Pitt coach other than Wanny who walked into a Pitt in 20 some years that didn't have a rebuild in front of them which is why the " hot seat" guys are a bunch of assholes... hey Pitts tried that revolving door shit for years now....how bout we NOT try that for awhile and see how THAT works??? Ok???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany1997
kind of embarassing reading some of these posts. narduzzi is in year two; he was left with a closet of mediocre talent on defense. could coaching be better, absolutely, but lets give him at least till next year till we start saying he is on the hot seat. we look like a fickle group of sore loser fans when we post things like this.
Losing for 35 years makes you sore!!! Fickle? How can we be fickle? We've been handed crap for over 3 decades and had nothing to to rally around. Thanks, Nordy, you bum. I still support Narduzzi but you have to expect a bunch of carping after a game like today's and yet another season of disappointing and frustrating FB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
There hasn't been a Pitt coach other than Wanny who walked into a Pitt in 20 some years that didn't have a rebuild in front of them which is why the " hot seat" guys are a bunch of assholes... hey Pitts tried that revolving door shit for years now....how bout we NOT try that for awhile and see how THAT works??? Ok???

Yup. The only guys who actually got time to win were Walt and Wanny and even their eras ended poorly. I'd like to have stability, even if the ceiling is 8 or 9 wins a year with a few 10 win seasons in there somewhere.
 
you are a little girl

one of the dumbest posts of the day

grow up

best coach we have had since Sherill

takes time stupid

little girls have no patience

Hail to Pitt
 
Anyone who understands anything about anything knows why you don't talk hot seat and anyone talking hot seat is just too damn stupid to talk with

Nobody should be on the hotseat in year two.

Why should it not be talked about? It doesn't affect anything.
 
He's ticking all the boxes for a poor head coach. Mentally unstable. Teams poorly prepared. Hires bad assistants. Can't/won't make necessary adjustments. Average at best recruiter.

Color me not impressed two years in.

yea, Canada was a bad hire.
 
These past few weeks have really shown me where the publisher's heart truly lies. I wish there were other options for reasonable people to discuss Pitt, but this site is becoming as bad as Scout. But if you post something negative about the sex scandal, you better believe Peak removes that post quick..can't upset his buddies. However, it's free reign for Pitt and PSU trolls to create new handles and trash our program, over and over and over. I'm done.

Buh Bye.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT