ADVERTISEMENT

Official Pitt Athletics branding guide

Good stuff in there. Whether everyone likes them or not, there are reasons behind everything. Sometimes folks need to be less self-centered and parochial, and more embracing.
Yup. Also, something important to remember-

These are NOT being marketed as returning to the “original” colors. It says in the branding guide this is an INTERPRETATION of the original colors so that they can better stand out from everyone else. For those saying they messed it up because they used the wrong colors, they know what they’re doing.
 
Yup. Also, something important to remember-

These are NOT being marketed as returning to the “original” colors. It says in the branding guide this is an INTERPRETATION of the original colors so that they can stand out from everyone else. For those saying they messed it up because they used the wrong colors, they know what they’re doing.

Yep. It's very clear that they did what they did intentionally after a lot of research and analysis. Sure, there are those whose personal tastes and preferences are opposed to it. But those in charge at Pitt worked in conjunction with athletics apparel powerhouse Nike to come up with this re-branding.

It is intended, IMO, to attempt to resonate with and appeal to the general majority and to make Pitt athletics recognizable, unique and distinctive. Nothing they could have done would receive unanimous approval.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whirlybird optio
Very interesting - I think this means we will likely see black or gray uniforms alternates, but NOT in Script PITT. Those will likely have script panthers and the panther head featured

Pages 13 and 14 show black and grey as alternative background colors for the yellow Pitt Script. So I think you can still have that on a black uniform..

Also the swim team suits and warm ups in the video are black with the Script
 
I read through this brochure

Towards the end, there is a page states "when it comes to brand, consistency is key"

I spit out my morning coffee laughing at this.

Block, Script, Script, Block, back to Block, now to Script, revisit Block, circle back to Script?
Using more color combinations than available in the color spectrum.

Maybe they mean from here on out??? Back to the future?
 
Last edited:
Is it just me, or do the marks just look infinitely better when there isn't a white outline around them.

I've always thought the same. The contrast in the colors is distinct and looks sharp enough without the white outline. If you recall, when Pitt introduced the Pitt script on the football helmets in 1973, there was no white outline around it. But things change and evolve over time.
 
I've always thought the same. The contrast in the colors is distinct and looks sharp enough without the white outline. If you recall, when Pitt introduced the Pitt script on the football helmets in 1973, there was no white outline around it. But things change and evolve over time.

Non-affiliated people tell me that the script looks like bubble lettering, and I think that is partly because of the white outlines, especially around gold script. And in my opinion, I think the white outline around the gold script just looks flat bad, and that included with the prior colors shades.

I'd just get rid of white outlines in most instances.

I've also had people state that they think we are trying to look like LSU.
 
Non-affiliated people tell me that the script looks like bubble lettering, and I think that is partly because of the white outlines, especially around gold script. And in my opinion, I think the white outline around the gold script just looks flat bad, and that included with the prior colors shades.

I'd just get rid of white outlines in most instances.

I've also had people state that they think we are trying to look like LSU.

I don't know about the LSU thing. But according to the document linked in the OP in this thread, and looking at some of the pictures of the new uniforms for some of the teams, it looks like there will be a variety of iterations of the script available. Some outlined. Some not.
 
You know the other thing that is overblown is the narrative that the Cathedral of Learning was built by the dimes donated by local children. Yes, that happened, but the amount raised was pretty token. The main money came from the Mellon brothers (both alumni), and most of the remaining money came from corporate and some individual gifts. The Cathedral fundraising campaign is considered, and perhaps actually was, the first time corporate fundraising was undertaken in higher education. It was actually quite a groundbreaking campaign. If that thing had been built today, it would have been called Mellon Tower.
 
Non-affiliated people tell me that the script looks like bubble lettering, and I think that is partly because of the white outlines, especially around gold script. And in my opinion, I think the white outline around the gold script just looks flat bad, and that included with the prior colors shades.

I'd just get rid of white outlines in most instances.

I've also had people state that they think we are trying to look like LSU.
Except we aren't and it doesn't...
 
Uh...yeah other than the purple in the uniforms and STRIPES on the shoulders and BLOCK letters with a tiger EMBLEM on the helmet, and arched stripes, they are exactly LSU uni's.

That’s just what some have said to me. Mostly to do with color brightness I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parkview57
Does anyone at all care that the font of the numbers reflect the lines in the cathedral?

After this reveal comes and goes....will anyone....anywhere....debate the nuances of the numbers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: crharris8892
Look for ga tech or cal to have a "reveal" in the next year or two.

I will LMAO when we no longer have a distinct color scheme
 
Look for ga tech or cal to have a "reveal" in the next year or two.

I will LMAO when we no longer have a distinct color scheme

My worst fear regarding the change would be for Notre Dame to wear a similar uni. Their pants looked a lot like us in the mid-70s, too.
 
I can no longer access this link. Trying to determine if it explains within why the Cathedral Stripe is pointing downwards on the football uni pants but upwards - like a repeating arch should - on all other uniforms that incorporate the stripe. Maybe just an error that's being corrected?
 
You know the other thing that is overblown is the narrative that the Cathedral of Learning was built by the dimes donated by local children. Yes, that happened, but the amount raised was pretty token. The main money came from the Mellon brothers (both alumni), and most of the remaining money came from corporate and some individual gifts. The Cathedral fundraising campaign is considered, and perhaps actually was, the first time corporate fundraising was undertaken in higher education. It was actually quite a groundbreaking campaign. If that thing had been built today, it would have been called Mellon Tower.
Your last sentence indeed resonate as i glance out of my office and see BNY Mellon, UPMC, Highmark etc logos on nearly every landmark building. So not only the naming but quite possibly the design aesthetics would likely have been impacted to work the sponsor logo in visibly. And not just on the CoL but likely every other major campus building. If Pitt were lucky they might be able to contain it to the lawn sign, but there's every possibility that for large enough funding, the sponsor might well insist on a lighted logo right at the top! Can only imagine how it would look...
 
Your last sentence indeed resonate as i glance out of my office and see BNY Mellon, UPMC, Highmark etc logos on nearly every landmark building. So not only the naming but quite possibly the design aesthetics would likely have been impacted to work the sponsor logo in visibly. And not just on the CoL but likely every other major campus building. If Pitt were lucky they might be able to contain it to the lawn sign, but there's every possibility that for large enough funding, the sponsor might well insist on a lighted logo right at the top! Can only imagine how it would look...

People don't realize how amazingly ambitious and difficult and unique the Cathedral of Learning project was, on multiple levels. And you have to put into context the state of the university at the time, which was struggling with debt, had a woefully inadequate physical plant, and, institutionally, was pretty much an afterthought locally and nationally. It certainly helped make the university what it is today in a lot of ways by raising its profile and support. It would make for a good Kurlander documentary.

Regarding, the Mellon brothers, they were private donors, so it wasn't from Mellon Bank. Therefore, it probably would have been named like the Pete without a big Mellon bank logo on it.

Here's a breakdown of contributions for the Cathedral of Learning.

Prior to the formal fundraising campaign, the following contributions were received:
Andrew W. & Richard B. Mellon $3,500,000 (the Cathedral lawn land on which it was built, equivalent to a gift of about $51million today). They may have substantially contributed to eliminating the schools $2 million ($29million in today's money) debt as well.
US Steel Co. $325,000 (about $5 million in today's money)
Judge Elbert H. Gary (US Steel Chairman) $50,000

The main fundraising campaign raised $9,178,871 through June 8, 1925. Below are the contributors:

Donors who gave $100,000 to $300,000 (this is like $1.5 to $4.5 million today)
Alcoa
Armstrong Cork
E.V. Babcock
George H. Clapp
Harry W. Croft
Gulf Refining Co.
Heinz Co.
Jones & Laughlin Steel
Koppers Co.
A. Marshall Lockhart
James H. Lockheart
McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.
Philadelphia Company & Affiliated Co.
Hamilton Stewart
J.C. Trees
Weirton Steel Co.
Westinghouse Air Break Co. (specifically $360,000)
Westinghouse Electric Co.

Donors who gave $10,000 to $99,000 (equivalent to ~$150K to $1.5 million today)
Mr. & Mrs. Marcus Aaron
American Window Glass Co.
Christine Arbuckle
James W. Arrott
John F. Casey Co.
George W. Crawford
Arthur V. Davis
Dr. & Mrs. Ogden M. Edwards Jr.
Elliott Company
Leon Falk
Maurice Falk
B.G. Follansbee
Isaac W. Frank
Helen C. Frick
D.L. Gillespie
Gillmore Drug Co.
George B. Gordon
A.R. Hamilton
N. Holmes
A.L. Humphrey
Mrs. Alfred E. Hunt
Roy A. Hunt
Iron City Electric Co.
Annie Given Kerr
H.H. McClintic
H.C. McEldowney
McKenna Brothers
May Drug Co.
W.L. Mellon
Mesta Machine Co.
William L. Monro
Oil Well Supply Co.
E.M. O'Neill
Peoples Natural Gas Co.
Pittsburgh Athletic Association
Mrs. Henry R. Rea
James H. Reed
Reliance Life Insurance Co.
S.S. Robertson
Mr. and Mrs. S. Rosenbloom
Edwin Ruud
Frederic Schaefer
William B. Schiller
Wilson A. Shaw
Malcolm C. Smith
Mrs. W.P. Snyder
W.P. Snyder, Jr.
Spang Chalfant & Co.
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co.
Standard Steel Car Co.
Standard Underground Cable Co.
Mrs. Mary R. D. Torrance
Trees Development Co.
United Engineering & Foundry Co.
Vanadium-Alloys Steel Co.
Mrs. H.N. Van Voorhis
E.T. Weir
West Penn Electric Co.
H.D. Williams
Henry Wittmer
Edward A. Woods

In addition, 16,922 individuals and businesses gave gifts of under $10K

97,000 certificates to children for their dimes (~$9,700; or equivalent to about $140K today, so it wasn't a substantial figure in the total cost, but its symbolism was important and it makes for a nice story)

Also, the Banks of Pittsburgh collectively gave $346,260
The Department Stores of Pittsburgh collectively gave $600,000

However, the "tall building" was controversy and let the following sums were removed from the building campaign and placed in the university's endowment:
$600,000 removed by the collective Pittsburgh department stores
$500,000 removed by an unnamed retired business man
$300,000 removed by an unnamed corporation

After the campaign, additional funds were received to finish the Cathedral, which languished during the onset of the depression. The following gifts to finish the building were received.
$10,000 George Gordon (trustee)
$1,030,000 George H. Clapp (that's about a $15 million gift in today's money)
$500,000 A.W. Mellon (stones for the Commons Room, another $7 million gift in today's money)
$500,000 Public Works Administration (workmen wages)
$50,000 E.V. Babcock
$200,000 in additional small checks
This does not count the Nationality Room Committees' fundraising efforts for their individual rooms.

The total cost was somewhere around $15 million by the time it was formally dedicated 1937. But it still could be considered unfinished today.

In addition, the Mellon brothers gave generously to fund the Stephen Foster Memorial. They were big time Pitt benefactors, and remember, Mellon Institute at the time was a defacto division of the University of Pittsburgh, not Carnegie Tech.
 
Last edited:
My worst fear regarding the change would be for Notre Dame to wear a similar uni. Their pants looked a lot like us in the mid-70s, too.
ND won’t ever change their gold though

Sure they have alternate gear but I don’t ever see a helmet that looks remotely like ours does now

GT won’t either... they really have not had the current shade of gold.

Are you guys trying to find stuff to pick at? ;)
 
ND won’t ever change their gold though

Sure they have alternate gear but I don’t ever see a helmet that looks remotely like ours does now

GT won’t either... they really have not had the current shade of gold.

Are you guys trying to find stuff to pick at? ;)

Pants are not helmuts.

I also said nothing about Ga. Tech.

Are you just trying to find stuff to pick at?
 
Fix the Cathedral Stripe on the football pants, Nike! It's upside-down. The arches are patterned to point upwards on all other uniforms that use the Cathedral Stripe. The way the stripe currently appears on the pants runs contrary to the concept.
 
The link for this was taken down, does anyone have a saved copy or a new link I could use? Going to get some custom cornhole boards made and I wanted to make sure I used the official logos and colors with high resolution images.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hohmes
The link for this was taken down, does anyone have a saved copy or a new link I could use? Going to get some custom cornhole boards made and I wanted to make sure I used the official logos and colors with high resolution images.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sidearm.si...uments/2019/4/9/Pitt_IDManual_FINAL_Share.pdf Try this.

Can be found here on the Pitt Athletics website: https://pittsburghpanthers.com/documents/2019/4/9/Pitt_IDManual_FINAL_Share.pdf

Thanks man!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT