in the last decade. He was a good back in college. Not great. He will be a good back in the NFL. Not great.
Look at Miles Sanders. Barkley was all hype.
Look at Miles Sanders. Barkley was all hype.
He has made one run for the Giants so far. He's averaging 2.5 ypc on 97% of his runs. That's a lot of plays the offense needs to run from behind the sticks because of his ineffectiveness 97% of the time.
The giants OL May be the worst in the NFL. No exaggeration
His ineffectiveness? The Giants offensive line is awful.He has made one run for the Giants so far. He's averaging 2.5 ypc on 97% of his runs. That's a lot of plays the offense needs to run from behind the sticks because of his ineffectiveness 97% of the time.
His ineffectiveness? The Giants offensive line is awful.
- a Ped State player is a bust in the NFL?
That’s hardly news.
Too early to say that about the much hyped Barkley.
I’d also back off anointing Sanders as a great back.- let’s see a few more games.
Last year I was wrong about Barkley - I bought into the hype.
Next week against Ohio State will be an enormous challenge and will be an indication if how good he really is.Miles Sanders is really good. 1st or 2nd Round good.
in the last decade. He was a good back in college. Not great. He will be a good back in the NFL. Not great.
Look at Miles Sanders. Barkley was all hype.
He has made one run for the Giants so far. He's averaging 2.5 ypc on 97% of his runs. That's a lot of plays the offense needs to run from behind the sticks because of his ineffectiveness 97% of the time.
Nice cherry picking.
I hate UPS more than the next guy. But I would wait 2 years, not 2 games to write off Barkley. The jury is still out. I will say the Giants are nuts to take him that high.in the last decade. He was a good back in college. Not great. He will be a good back in the NFL. Not great.
Look at Miles Sanders. Barkley was all hype.
For TWO years Barkley has been doing the same thing. Averaging 2 yards per carry and popping one or two long ones. The stats even in college were like clockwork.
.
How is his whole body of work so far "cherry picking"?
Lol. So now 97% is considered his "whole body of work"? Take off the Pitt colored glasses, whatever color that is, we don't know.
Next week against Ohio State will be an enormous challenge and will be an indication if how good he really is.
Next week against Ohio State will be an enormous challenge and will be an indication if how good he really is.
Actually, that was the biggest criticism of Barry Sanders. He didn't consistently move the sticks. He would electrify you with 2 or 3 big plays, but the rest of the time, it was 2 yard gains, or getting tackled for a loss.
I like Sanders A LOT! Good for him. Proud Pittsburgh kid. Think Frank Gore.in the last decade. He was a good back in college. Not great. He will be a good back in the NFL. Not great.
Look at Miles Sanders. Barkley was all hype.
I like Sanders A LOT! Good for him. Proud Pittsburgh kid. Think Frank Gore.
Seahawks have that "honor".The giants OL May be the worst in the NFL. No exaggeration
This should be 3rd grade math but since you are struggling with this, I'll spell it out.
1 long run represents 3% of his carries.
97% represents all of the other carries.
When you apply 3 grade level math you get 100% of his carries.
You can't take out anything if you are using his whole body of work. Not hard.
I like Sanders A LOT! Good for him. Proud Pittsburgh kid. Think Frank Gore.
You can't take out anything if you are using his whole body of work. Not hard.
Are you already drunk?
"He has made one run for the Giants so far. He's averaging 2.5 ypc on 97% of his runs"
That statement covers 100% of his carries (as explained by previous 3rd grade math example above). 100% of his runs is his "whole body of work". Maybe comprehension of percentages is 4th grade math but nonetheless.
Next week against Ohio State will be an enormous challenge and will be an indication if how good he really is.Miles Sanders is really good. 1st or 2nd Round good.