Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Locker Room' started by TempleBAPittMPA, May 23, 2020 at 12:45 AM.
Oh boy . . .
So, if one accepts the obvious fact that a group of people in the Intel community conspired to sink a political administration, one also must accept all the additional beliefs of some phantom "Q" person or group?
Hey ABC, poison the well much?
On a side note, any candidate who admits to "literally crying" won't ever get my vote. But I guess that's how they grow conservatives out in Oregon.
there are no conservatives in oregon
In other news the DNC is letting Joey out for his morning meal .....
It is odd. But we have to remember that the entire Democratic establishment has been proponents of conspiracies as well. Russia, Russia, Russia!
Does an R have a snowballs chance in hell of winning in Oregon?
I suppose there could be some backlash over the idiot governor locking down the state despite the small number of deaths and cases but I just done see it
Are you unaware that the GOP confirmed that there was Russian interference in 2016 to help get disinfectant Donnie elected?
I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but I did take notice of the headlights on that one protestor.
A few too many high quality T Shirts that look like they were just handed out for me to take this story seriously. "Let's make sure everyone sees the Q".
Color me skeptical. A badly run op, more likely
And so what if the Senate intel committee joins the chorus of "I believe whatever Clapper says". Russians post on FB? What a revelation. So does the CIA.
After you typed it I found myself going to the article. The Q definitely showing some bending thanks to the rack.
Are you aware that some things may have come to light since that report was issued...as in Brennan witholding info that showed that there was Russian meddling to assist Hillary also ?
"Well, it turns out Obama’s CIA chief, John Brennan also had intel saying ‘actually Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.”
It's one of the things Durham is investigating. If and why Brennan withheld this info.
The docs are in the process of being de-classified now.
Rabbit hole time again.
The Clinton and Sanders campaign both suspected that foreign interference was occurring to assist their campaign. They both reported their suspicions real time.
That other campaign decided that lying was a better course of action.
I know, I know - the point of these facts are lost on the TDS crowd and it's pointless to state what's obvious to everyone else.
Yet, unfortunately , NOTHING will come from this . These scumbags are irreproachable .
No wonder there were unfortunately assassinations back in the day .
Not in any way condoning it but all the same . The insanity seems to be a understandable justice . Hopefully, yet the odds are against it . Justice will prevail .
Good luck with that . More outrage I'd bet on .
Adding info that wasn't previously available is going down a rabbit hole ?
No wonder you're so uninformed and closed minded on so many topics.
You don't really like having your assumptions questioned, do you ?
As stated,this is newly released info.
Talk about deflection attempts.
You didn't address one point in my post or the argument linked that might point to the idea that Russia may have been attempting to assist Hillary also and Brennan hid it because it doesnt fit in the echo chamber.
There's wasn't any assumptions in my comment. If you want to argue about facts as if they are not facts- that's the waste of time rabbit hole I was referring to.
How is Brennan 'hiding' things that were public knowledge back in 2016?
Read the article.
If you have to ask that question its clear that either-
A) you didn't read the article
B) you didn't understand the article
C) you're trying to change the subject.
Take your pick.
Maybe in your haste to respond you missed this part of my first post -
("It's one of the things Durham is investigating. If and why Brennan withheld this info.
The docs are in the process of being de-classified now.)
They don't declassify info that has been public knowledge since 2016.
It reads like a nothing-burger for the reasons stated. I'm not sure which part is confusing to you.
If you or the author were unaware that that Clinton and Sanders campaign reported suspicions back 2016- I understand why this seems relevant.
This is like me accusing you of hiding the facts of Donnie's made-up Obamagate when we all already know it's made-up.
More off topic drivel.
The article was about new documents coming to light after the fact that might change the fact pattern and narrative.
I'm not sure why this is so confusing to you. I never claimed it was anything other than a possibility that your spiking of the football may have been premature but here you go.
Changing the topic,throwing in a strawman. Sure you don't want to go for the trifecta ?
I know this might be a hard concept for some to grasp but it's why they have court of appeals in the judicial system.
Info comes to light after some people have their minds made up to help them reconsider their thoughts
Not TDS sufferers like yourself who would claim Orange man bad even if Clapper, Brennan,Comey and the rest came out and flat out stated they made it all up and set Trump up.
People who have a sincere interest in learning ALL of the info.
I won't defend the candidate, truth be told this was the first I heard about it. However, your statement is ignorant. Allow me to enlighten you. Take the entire West Coast, slice it in half 100 miles off the ocean border, and you have a heavy conservative lean. And you'll see a lot of Jefferson State flags, bulletins, etc.. The problem is this base is overwhelmed by coastal populations. So people who don't know anything lump us all in together, when it's not the case at all.
Not only was I aware of that, but I am also aware that no conspiracies happened between Russia and the Trump campaign. Since when is Russia (or any other country) interfering in our elections (on Facebook!) enough to start a spying operation and ending in an impeachment? Only to those who believe in unfounded conspiracy theories - like you and Gregor.
i live in lv and have for 18 years. you are a rare bread out there
A whole 18 years? In Vegas? Come on man. How does that make you an expert to talk about conservatives in Oregon, Cali, and Washington? You chop the nuts off the coast and it's all different. University towns and cities obviously bring the woke but it is not happy happy racist racist Democrats.