ADVERTISEMENT

OT- PENS .... some post game 1 and upcoming game 2 thoughts...

goalieman

All P I T T !
Gold Member
Jun 2, 2002
32,022
3,927
113
Some thoughts on the game 1 loss and strategy for game 2......

- Game 1 .... terrible 1st period. Gave up a goal 28 sec into the 1st period when both our D-men looked like they were sleeping. Lovejoy didn't play his man close enough on the long cross ice pass allowing the left winger to get off a hard shot on Fleury who made the save but gave up a bad rebound into the slot right on the stick of a Ranger forward who inexplicably got behind Martin and one timed a shot past Fleury who had little chance to stop it ..... if Martin played his position properly he could have either cleared the rebound or tied up the Ranger player..... we had too many penalties in the 1st period (four) and they scored a PP goal when Spalling tried to block a shot from the point, it went through his legs (and I think deflected off the top of his left skate changing direction slightly), Fleury lost sight of it and it went into the net..... we have to be a lot more disciplined then we were in the 1st period and not take so many stupid penalties...... in the 2nd and 3rd period I thought we played well and even slightly outplayed the Rangers.
Fourth line played well in game 1 ..... we were pretty good 5 on 5 when we made short, quick breakout passes to negate the Rangers aggressive forecheck and when we got the puck in deep behind the Ranger D-men to negate their team speed advantage. I thought Fleury played very well in game 1.
I think we are one "1st two line winger" short ..... I just don't like Winnik on Crosby's line, he doesn't skate well enough and doesn't score .... we miss a healthy Dupuis..... obviously we miss Letang, Ehrhoff, and Maatta on defense ..... especially Letang.
Game 2 ..... keys to me are to stay out of the penalty box, short quick breakout passes to negate the Ranger forecheck, get the puck in deep behind the Rangers D-men and win the battles down low, Fleury has to continue to play well ...... Lundqvist plays deep in the net, we have to get some traffic in front of him for screens, deflections, rebound shots and go high with shots from in tight.
I'd like to see the same 4th line of Lapierre, Spalling, Comeau which played well in game 1 ...... consider moving Kunitz back to the 1st line and make it Crosby, Hornqvist, and Kunitiz ..... Kunitiz has more speed then Winnik and can score but still forechecks well .... make the 2nd line Malkin, Perron, and Bennett/Winnik with a 3rd line of Sutter, Downie, Bennett/Winnik .... we could sure use Dupuis on the 1st or 2nd line.
Just some thoughts.
 
Originally posted by vegasgreed:
Here is another thought. Pens lose this series, maybe swept.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Certainly possible at this point but that is why they play the games ....... any thoughts on strategy for the Pens ?
 
After the opening goal and 4 trips to the box [at least 2 of which were deserved] the Pens settled down and I thought matched the play of the rangers. So they are down 1-0 in the series [someone is down 1-0 in every series] the Pens are left with the knowledge that they can compete. That is not something to take lightly.

Getting some pucks past the goaltender is another story. the Pens need a breakout performance from their big guns, preferably tonight. a win tonight or in the first game in Pittsburgh will get the Rangers thinking a bit.

The playoffs are a funny thing. One never knows if or when momentum will swing.
Maybe the Pens get swept, which is the popular prediction lately. But maybe the Pens steal a win and big Mo swings their way. They do have the talent to do it. That's why they play the games.
 
Originally posted by wbrpanther:
After the opening goal and 4 trips to the box [at least 2 of which were deserved] the Pens settled down and I thought matched the play of the rangers. So they are down 1-0 in the series [someone is down 1-0 in every series] the Pens are left with the knowledge that they can compete. That is not something to take lightly.

Getting some pucks past the goaltender is another story. the Pens need a breakout performance from their big guns, preferably tonight. a win tonight or in the first game in Pittsburgh will get the Rangers thinking a bit.

The playoffs are a funny thing. One never knows if or when momentum will swing.
Maybe the Pens get swept, which is the popular prediction lately. But maybe the Pens steal a win and big Mo swings their way. They do have the talent to do it. That's why they play the games.
Agree with your post windber ...... scoring has been a problem for the Pens down the stretch and in game 1 of the playoffs .... we have to get some pucks past Lundqvist and that is not easy as he is an elite goalie .... you have to get traffic in front of him to screen him and also hope for deflections and rebounds to knock in ... because he often plays deep in the crease, the opening for shots in tight is high (elevate the puck)...... a playoff series allows for game to game adjustments against your opponent .... we'll see what adjustments are made by the two teams.
 
gm, you said "elevate the puck." How is that done? Also, how would the opposite be accomplished? I've never played a game of hockey in my life. So I'm trying to picture how this is done.

If the ice weren't solid ... then I could see the stick getting under the puck and lifting it. How does the player control whether the puck rises or not?
 
Originally posted by ricflair4LIFE:
gm, you said "elevate the puck." How is that done? Also, how would the opposite be accomplished? I've never played a game of hockey in my life. So I'm trying to picture how this is done.

If the ice weren't solid ... then I could see the stick getting under the puck and lifting it. How does the player control whether the puck rises or not?
ric ..... click on the link below and then on the demonstration in the link which shows the basic technique in lifting the puck ....

http://howtohockey.com/how-to-raise-the-puck-and-improve-your-accuracy
 
Originally posted by ricflair4LIFE:
gm, you said "elevate the puck." How is that done? Also, how would the opposite be accomplished? I've never played a game of hockey in my life. So I'm trying to picture how this is done.

If the ice weren't solid ... then I could see the stick getting under the puck and lifting it. How does the player control whether the puck rises or not?
You're kidding right? You have lived in Pennsylvania most of your life right? Hockey sticks have curves, most shots taken are via wrists, you don't slap down on the puck. "Elevating" the puck is quite easy......on your own. It is when time and space becomes limited is where it is harder, but almost every shot take is off the ice in some manner. It maybe 3-4 inches, it maybe a foot, it maybe 2-3 feet. The ice and puck are not magnet and steel.
 
Not kidding at all.

The only things that existed in my world were football, basketball, baseball and boxing. (some track and field).

Liked the "time and space " example.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT