I think guys like Narduzzi knows talent when he sees it and can coach it... Keep the faith...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87445/8744506062284960cff3410f654f5eab422317b2" alt="MSU_zps359a7735.png~original"
Well it beats the hell out of reading thread after thread about what's his name going to ND... I'll see if I can start up PSU thread instead....
Couldn't agree more. Fan's just have to move on. The kid made the best decision for himself and that is it. I am confident Narduzzi will find a suitable replacement.Well it beats the hell out of reading thread after thread about what's his name going to ND... I'll see if I can start up PSU thread instead....
I think this is a great discussion, and certainly a good alternative than the Jeter threads. Pittmeister, do you have the number of prospects from those recruiting classes that ended up going to the NFL for each team?
There was so much talent at PITT under DW (especially in 2009), but he couldn't win a miserably terrible Big East title outright.
Check MSU's recruiting classes the past four years. It's not even close.
It means no less than the graphs that are constantly shown on here that imply a different conclusion. They are both worthless.
It's not proof positive of anything but it does provide supporting evidence for what MSU did on the field during that time-regularly beating teams with far better on-paper personnel.Worthless?
Disagree - Graph show several things. Consistent good coaching is important - more important than having a highly "rated" class. Pitt beat MSU regularly in the "ratings" but got out produced on the field. Its been said before Pitts "coaching carousel" was more devastating to the program than the Peds getting caught hiding a serial child molester.
It's worth noting that MSU's rise came at the same time as some of the Big Ten upheaval; PSU's rape enabler issues, Michigan's issues, Ohio State's issues. MSU has a very good coach, but he was also helped by timing.
Sadly, Pitt had the same opportunity and didn't capitalize.It's worth noting that MSU's rise came at the same time as some of the Big Ten upheaval; PSU's rape enabler issues, Michigan's issues, Ohio State's issues. MSU has a very good coach, but he was also helped by timing.
No question about that, but here they are, still winning, still beating those teams. Dantonio is 11-4 versus ranked teams since 2013, and has won 6 of his last 7, including wins over two top 5s, with the only loss being to Alabama.It's worth noting that MSU's rise came at the same time as some of the Big Ten upheaval; PSU's rape enabler issues, Michigan's issues, Ohio State's issues. MSU has a very good coach, but he was also helped by timing.
Pitt still has the opportunity while The U, VT, UVa, Syracuse are rebuilding. Coastal's wide open.Sadly, Pitt had the same opportunity and didn't capitalize.
If Pitt had competent leadership we would be much farther along in college footballs pecking order.
As far as garenteed success doing it the Michigan st way is blind faith in my opinion.
If Narduzzi was the head coach at Michigan st i could get behind what the poster who started this thread is saying. However, its one thing absorbing what another guy did. Its a whole different ball game implementing it. When your the guy in charge.
That's why most successful coordinator's shit the bed when they finally get a head coaching job.
Hopefully, Narduzzi breaks the odds of succeeding instead of failing. As many coordinators do.
Something we won't know for a couple of years. So far its promising. A win the week will really turn heads
I hear ya. However, i wouldn't use Miami in that group. Seems like their new coach got them playing great ball. Basically that seems to be what was missing at MiamiPitt still has the opportunity while The U, VT, UVa, Syracuse are rebuilding. Coastal's wide open.
That's exactly right. However, he is saying that the changing in the Pitt HC hurt Pittsburgh which is also exactly right. MSU did rise under perfect conditions for them. Rutgers is down the next 2 years because of the terrible recruiting caused by Flood when we were 55-70th in recruiting but when Schiano was at Rutgers we were in the 30-40th in recruiting. Ash appears to be getting back in the 30's ranking.It's worth noting that MSU's rise came at the same time as some of the Big Ten upheaval; PSU's rape enabler issues, Michigan's issues, Ohio State's issues. MSU has a very good coach, but he was also helped by timing.
It is my early opinion, Ash is going to be a terrific coach for Rutgers and his coaching and recruiting are much improving Rutgers Team and Program, any thoughts yet on your views too of Ash.That's exactly right. However, he is saying that the changing in the Pitt HC hurt Pittsburgh which is also exactly right. MSU did rise under perfect conditions for them. Rutgers is down the next 2 years because of the terrible recruiting caused by Flood when we were 55-70th in recruiting but when Schiano was at Rutgers we were in the 30-40th in recruiting. Ash appears to be getting back in the 30's ranking.
Miami has a big time QB. Richt couldnt be in a better place in his first year.I hear ya. However, i wouldn't use Miami in that group. Seems like their new coach got them playing great ball. Basically that seems to be what was missing at Miami
Well it beats the hell out of reading thread after thread about what's his name going to ND... I'll see if I can start up PSU thread instead....
I think most Rutger fans see the difference already even though we don't have a decent QB, I hear he ranked in the 100's. Whole lot less penalties and come from behind wins. His recruiting is much better than expected for his first year and surprised everyone but Maryland coaches are even better than Rutgers or Penn State. I think Nuzz is a good coach but might need help in recruiting. The problem is coaching is 50% recruiting and 50% coaching up players and game calling. We will have 2 duel threat QB next year and some WR that can get open. I like we moved to the spread.It is my early opinion, Ash is going to be a terrific coach for Rutgers and his coaching and recruiting are much improving Rutgers Team and Program, any thoughts yet on your views too of Ash.
It is my opinion, Ash is going to lock up Top Talent in NJ that will hurt Programs like BC, PSU, and some other Schools even Pitt too!
Sadly, Pitt had the same opportunity and didn't capitalize.
If Pitt had competent leadership we would be much farther along in college footballs pecking order.
As far as garenteed success doing it the Michigan st way is blind faith in my opinion.
If Narduzzi was the head coach at Michigan st i could get behind what the poster who started this thread is saying. However, its one thing absorbing what another guy did. Its a whole different ball game implementing it. When your the guy in charge.
That's why most successful coordinator's shit the bed when they finally get a head coaching job.
Hopefully, Narduzzi breaks the odds of succeeding instead of failing. As many coordinators do.
Something we won't know for a couple of years. So far its promising. A win the week will really turn heads
I agree, the honeymoon is about 2-3 years. Wanny really recruited like crazy the first 2-3 years as well as Franklin.I don't know Captain I was always a better coach when I had good players on my team,coaching helps but you need talent to get to the top level!Great teams have great players and that's the bottom line.Look at the top teams is it great coaching or great players why they win.Ash and Durkin are on a recruiting honeymoon right now,its easy to sell the hype the first year in recruiting.But if you don't win early the hype fades fast ask Franklin.If they don't win quickly the good ones will not go there,i ts the way if the world in 2016.Pitts line with NC just dropped out here in Vegas money coming in on Pitt!H2P
What head coaches have there ever been who were not at one point coordinators????
What a bullshit "point".....