Rachel Maddow: transgender or transblamer? Or just hates white Christians?

[SoufOaklin4Life]

If she's smart, then she's lying, since no libs have smart ideas. Obama's pals bought his degrees....did that make him smart??
I don't care what gender, race, religion, ethnicity any liberal is. They're the problem, not the solution. Except the Pope.

And yet...they are on the right side of history of issues, while conservative principles keep failing when implemented.
just a coincidence.

 

[NCPitt]

And yet...they are on the right side of history of issues, while conservative principles keep failing when implemented.
just a coincidence.

You don't understand how "history" works.

No surprise there.

 

[deepelemblues]

I see the problem. You think that when I write "old white men" is means every single last one of them. I am making a generalization, and for the most part it's true. Plenty of liberal educated men who don't get nearly the heat that women get for the same statements, unless they are black... then yes. I'm pretty sure that if someone did an analysis of opinion data on select liberal women, that white men 50+ would be the category that has the highest percentage of unfavorably for folks like Hillary, Warren, etc. It will outpace the unfavorability of similar white male candidates.

Can I see the raw data (again)? That "for the most part" old white men don't like educated, liberal women?

Not agreeing with their politics and not wanting to vote for them is also not the same as disliking them because they're uppity wimmens.

I guess if she had longer hair and a large chest, she might be acceptable for viewing?

Because old white men "for the most part" only value wimmens if they're long-haired with a minimum 32C chest, right?

Can I see the raw data (again again)?

And yet...they are on the right side of history of issues, while conservative principles keep failing when implemented.
just a coincidence.

I guess I was wrong when I thought Souf would be too smart to ever trot out that stupidest of the newly popular political neologisms of this decade, "the right side of history."

The only recent issue that liberals have been on the right side of is gay marriage and gay rights in general. Financial policy... liberal principles in both Europe and the US have delivered weak growth and in Europe the backlash against them is tearing the continent apart little by little. Multiculturalism, at least the kind implemented by public policy there, is now viewed as a mistake. Here in the US, even the vast majority of liberals agree with the generally regarded as conservative position of a two-parent family being ideal. Not exclusively heterosexual two-parent families, but it was only a generation ago that single mothers were viewed as great for empowering themselves or having the chance to empower themselves in the family context independent of men, not as women in a bad situation with bad prospects for them and their children. Liberals have essentially swallowed whole conservative, even neoconservative principles on national security and the intelligence complex since Obama became president. What is the difference between Obama and Bush on war and spying? Obama doesn't send ground troops, except special forces raids. That's the only difference on war. There is no difference at all on spying.

Tell me some of these conservative principles that you think keep failing when implemented and what issues liberals are on the right side of history. I'll just pre-emptively say that polarizing race issues by trying to guilt trip whites and making negative generalizations about whites and their alleged conscious or unconscious universal racism and "privilege," as has become vogue in liberal thought, is not being on the right side of history.

 

[paulbl99]

Can I see the raw data (again)? That "for the most part" old white men don't like educated, liberal women?

Not agreeing with their politics and not wanting to vote for them is also not the same as disliking them because they're uppity wimmens.



Because old white men "for the most part" only value wimmens if they're long-haired with a minimum 32C chest, right?

Can I see the raw data (again again)?



I guess I was wrong when I thought Souf would be too smart to ever trot out that stupidest of the newly popular political neologisms of this decade, "the right side of history."

The only recent issue that liberals have been on the right side of is gay marriage and gay rights in general. Financial policy... liberal principles in both Europe and the US have delivered weak growth and in Europe the backlash against them is tearing the continent apart little by little. Multiculturalism, at least the kind implemented by public policy there, is now viewed as a mistake. Here in the US, even the vast majority of liberals agree with the generally regarded as conservative position of a two-parent family being ideal. Not exclusively heterosexual two-parent families, but it was only a generation ago that single mothers were viewed as great for empowering themselves or having the chance to empower themselves in the family context independent of men, not as women in a bad situation with bad prospects for them and their children. Liberals have essentially swallowed whole conservative, even neoconservative principles on national security and the intelligence complex since Obama became president. What is the difference between Obama and Bush on war and spying? Obama doesn't send ground troops, except special forces raids. That's the only difference on war. There is no difference at all on spying.

Tell me some of these conservative principles that you think keep failing when implemented and what issues liberals are on the right side of history. I'll just pre-emptively say that polarizing race issues by trying to guilt trip whites and making negative generalizations about whites and their alleged conscious or unconscious universal racism and "privilege," as has become vogue in liberal thought, is not being on the right side of history.

Basically he is completely full of shite

 

[BPKY]

She occupies the flagship spot on cable's least-watched America-based news network.*

Funny. Reminds me of the Dr. Manhattan line from the movie Watchmen:

• I am disappointed, Veidt. Very disappointed. Restructuring myself after the subtraction of my intrinsic field was the first trick I learned. It didn't kill Osterman... Did you think it would kill me? I've walked across the surface of the sun. I've seen events so tiny and so fast they hardly can be said to have occurred at all. But you... you're just aman. And the world's smartest man poses no more threat to me than does its smartest termite.

Maddow is very good on a very short list of liberal causes. Not a very large large wheelhouse though.

 

[BPKY]

And yet...they are on the right side of history
just a coincidence.

The right side of history.....how quaint.

 

[Gary77]

What I said was true. Old white guys want it to be 1950 again. It isn't... and never was for many groups. Maddow is liberal. She's female. She is gay. She is smart. And she has a prominent spot on television espousing her philosophy. Old white dudes can't stand it because she doesn't know her place baking cookies and popping out 8 children.

I think it's wonderful that she's not "popping out children".