The new LB coach, was the DC at Buckneil
I have no idea if he can coach or recruit
I have no idea if he can coach or recruit, but it looks like he never coached a game at Bucknell. They basically hired Ohio Dominican's DC (whoever the hell that is).
Everyone has to start somewhere.I have no idea if he can coach or recruit, but it looks like he never coached a game at Bucknell. They basically hired Ohio Dominican's DC (whoever the hell that is).
I think he was the DC on the 2019 Bucknell team that went 3-8. Although I think that was a down year in general for the Patriot League; the team did appear competitive in conference games going .500.I have no idea if he can coach or recruit, but it looks like he never coached a game at Bucknell. They basically hired Ohio Dominican's DC (whoever the hell that is).
He was hired in February 2019 so he would've coached the 2019 season for Bucknell.
Obviously as a small school coach, it's hard to know what he'll bring. I will say I like taking a shot on fast risers with positional coaches. Guys who've coached under good minds at multiple schools looking to move up the food chain. Hopefully Manalac fits the bill and develops into a strong recruiter.
If he can recruit Ohio and recruit his position, I am happy with the hire.He allegedly beat out a HS coach so how bad can he be?
If he can recruit Ohio and recruit his position, I am happy with the hire.
Every staff needs some young blood.
Ohio Dominican is in Columbus.I have no idea if he can coach or recruit, but it looks like he never coached a game at Bucknell. They basically hired Ohio Dominican's DC (whoever the hell that is).
Ohio Dominican is in Columbus.
I think it is the weakest unit of the defense, has the least depth.One thing that he has working in his favor is
a returning LB'r group that is talented and
experienced......Campbell, Bright, Davis. Those
are three starters, and Sirvocea was only
All ACC (third team). How do you keep him
off the field? There's also frosh and subs
moving up. This IMO is now a team strength.
Hell, I could coach that group LOL
I think it is the weakest unit of the defense, has the least depth.
Pitt doesn't care about football, let's be real , I use to have so much passion but I check on this board once a week and go to 1 game a year, it's kind of a phasing out thing. I use to drive 9 hours each week to see them play but reality finally hit , finally! I don't blame Pitt, but I'm not caring as much when they don't, it's fine for real. Still root for them
Thanks for sharing.Pitt doesn't care about football, let's be real , I use to have so much passion but I check on this board once a week and go to 1 game a year, it's kind of a phasing out thing. I use to drive 9 hours each week to see them play but reality finally hit , finally! I don't blame Pitt, but I'm not caring as much when they don't, it's fine for real. Still root for them
Davis, Bright, Campbell, Dennis and Pine look good to very good on paper.I went and looked at the roster. Above I mentioned
three returning starters. Following those three are
Sirvocea, Pine, and George. That's six with experience,
and I'm pretty sure all six have different degrees of
starting experience. That's not bad for a returning
two deep. There's also DeShields and Kamara returning.
Add in the frosh and it looks to me to have not only
talent and experience, but also depth.
Thanks for sharing.Pitt doesn't care about football, let's be real , I use to have so much passion but I check on this board once a week and go to 1 game a year, it's kind of a phasing out thing. I use to drive 9 hours each week to see them play but reality finally hit , finally! I don't blame Pitt, but I'm not caring as much when they don't, it's fine for real. Still root for them
Davis, Bright, Campbell, Dennis and Pine look good to very good on paper.
Davis is coming of injury, he hadn’t played much before it. He is not a proven player.. I thought George was disappointing. Petrishen played some, didn’t see much from him.
Both Bright and Campbell appeared less impactful than the year before. Dennis, inexplicably, was invisible in our last game.
Kamara played special teams and looked good.
Roberts did not play? . Deshields was shifted to receiver?
Who are the freshmen linebackers? Lavant? Is Brown a LB?
Not saying it is a bad unit. I just like the DL and the DBs better.
Pitt is in the 30-40 range of football programs in the country. It isn’t a coincidence that the schools that are usually in the Top 10 also receive the most financial support from their alumni.Pitt doesn't care about football, let's be real , I use to have so much passion but I check on this board once a week and go to 1 game a year, it's kind of a phasing out thing. I use to drive 9 hours each week to see them play but reality finally hit , finally! I don't blame Pitt, but I'm not caring as much when they don't, it's fine for real. Still root for them
Pitt is in the 30-40 range of football programs in the country. It isn’t a coincidence that the schools that are usually in the Top 10 also receive the most financial support from their alumni.
Correct - our alumni support is on par with BC and WF. The universities that receive a ton of support from their alums are the ones that should receive the most criticism. Schools like Tennessee should not be floundering so badly.Not always a guarantee. Look at Tennessee and USC, for a short list. Pitt is getting more support from the school than ever but it takes time to rebuild a donor base.
PSU troll. 'Nuff said.Pretty soon you'll be able to say you "use" to root for them.
We should be able to beat out Cincy for players we prioritize. They are still G5.I like the hire. Connections in Ohio are always a plus since TOSU and UC can’t get everybody.Keep in mind also that Bates was a long time linebackers coach so he will help a lot and more importantly this hire will be a cheap a
hire that frees up more money to retain Partridge and and young recruiters like Beatty , Sanders And Collins. Couple that with veteran coaches like Duzz, Powell, Whip , Salem , Borbs and Randy Bates so we have a nice blend of experience and hungry coaches,
The new LB coach, was the DC at Buckneil
I think it is the weakest unit of the defense, has the least depth.
I use to have so much passion but I check on this board once a week
Is there any evidence even anecdotal that he can coach well and/or recruit?
Have you ever had a young employee or co-worker you thought was very smart. worked very hard and looked promising, that you decided to mentor?How is Manalac's hire a good one? Is there any evidence even anecdotal that he can coach well and/or recruit? Any?
Have you ever had a young employee or co-worker that you thought was very smart. worked very hard and looked promising, that you decided to mentor?
I believe he worked with Narduzzi. That should have given some indication of his ability to coach.Sure, but I am also aware of employees who were hired because the person was perceived as someone who would do what he was told, not rock the boat, play it safe, work for less money than the more capable other candidate, or because the employee spoke with the same accent as the person doing the hiring. By the way, which of those worthy characteristics you mention is supported by "even anecdotal evidence" that Manalac can coach well or is an effective recruiter?
Sure, but I am also aware of employees who were hired because the person was perceived as someone who would do what he was told, not rock the boat, play it safe, work for less money than the more capable other candidate, or because the employee spoke with the same accent as the person doing the hiring. By the way, which of those worthy characteristics you mention is supported by "even anecdotal evidence" that Manalac can coach well or is an effective recruiter?
Can you even name the last three LB Coaches at Pitt? Harley had 1 season at FIU and was a former GA under Narduzzi at MSU. Haering was a high school coach. Without Google I have no idea who held that role under Graham. Relax.
in other words,”no” we have no idea whatsoever if Manalak is a good choice or not.