Maybe Heather needs to do some exit interviews
He didn’t have to relate with players at Duke as they were mostly one and dones so they tolerated him and were playing for K anywayAs I said in another post, players dont really like Capel, which is the thing that's surprised me the most. He's not a player's coach. One of the most important thing to look for in our search next March is for a guy the players actually like. I would interview former players of prospective candidates to get a vibe.
You might be right, but do you have any actual evidence of this beyond the usual conjecture?As I said in another post, players dont really like Capel, which is the thing that's surprised me the most. He's not a player's coach. One of the most important thing to look for in our search next March is for a guy the players actually like. I would interview former players of prospective candidates to get a vibe.
You might be right, but do you have any actual evidence of this beyond the usual conjecture?
Neither is his mentor Coach K or K’s mentor Bobby Knight. The challenge he has had is recruiting players that want to play for a coach like that. He clearly hasn’t done that and good luck finding players that will buy into that framework, especially in a basement program.As I said in another post, players dont really like Capel, which is the thing that's surprised me the most. He's not a player's coach. One of the most important thing to look for in our search next March is for a guy the players actually like. I would interview former players of prospective candidates to get a vibe.
I know this is not a popular opinion to many and I know the finances wouldn't allow it; but I would've liked to see Sean Miller hired at Pitt (some way some how). Instant credibility with transfers and high school recruits. Would bring excitement back to the program along with a much better chance of getting back to the tournament.As I said in another post, players dont really like Capel, which is the thing that's surprised me the most. He's not a player's coach. One of the most important thing to look for in our search next March is for a guy the players actually like. I would interview former players of prospective candidates to get a vibe.
He is not a good enough coach for Pitt which is why you see him at lowly Xavier.I know this is not a popular opinion to many and I know the finances wouldn't allow it; but I would've liked to see Sean Miller hired at Pitt (some way some how). Instant credibility with transfers and high school recruits. Would bring excitement back to the program along with a much better chance of getting back to the tournament.
No its not. A program like Xavier wouldn't hire one of the very worst coaches in college basketball history if they were a better program like Pitt.Right now, not saying overall, Xavier is a much better program than Pitt.
We lost 2 league-average guards in Horton and Femi. Replacing them with Nike and Cummings is pretty close to an equal trade. Our other losses werent ACC players so you'd have to think we can upgrade.I'm interested in the net-net of the transfers after all of the dust settles. I predict that when Capel is done doing more of his damage with these transfers, we will be much worse off as a team and program than we were at the end of this past season. I know the guys who are in the portal weren't exactly world beaters. But we have to remember whoever we get in the portal will still be coached by Capel. And that is not a good situation at all.
We lost 2 league-average guards in Horton and Femi. Replacing them with Nike and Cummings is pretty close to an equal trade. Our other losses werent ACC players so you'd have to think we can upgrade.
Last year vs Next Year
PG - Femi vs Cummings
SG - Burton vs Burton
SF - Jeffress and Horton vs Nike
PF - Gueye vs Transfer
C - Hugley vs Hugley
PG, SG, and C is a push. SF swings Nike's way. PF is Gueye.
Maybe Heather needs to do some exit interviews
If it’s not Heather then certainly one of the Associate ADs is collecting information and player feedback. It’s pretty standard fare for all programs.Do you really think that doesn't happen?
Or that those involved like Heather or JC are’t totally aware of the players intentions before they enter the portal .Do you really think that doesn't happen?
Xavier has been a better “overall” program than Pitt for a very long time by postseason success, including during the Dixon heyday at Pitt. And postseason success is how everyone, including coaches and players, measures success in college basketball.Right now, not saying overall, Xavier is a much better program than Pitt.
You’re not using the proper font…No its not. A program like Xavier wouldn't hire one of the very worst coaches in college basketball history if they were a better program like Pitt.
If it does, it must be being ignored entirely.Do you really think that doesn't happen?
Can anyone explain how the results on this page jive with Heather’s remarks regarding transfers and coaching staff player interactions referenced in this article?
This is what is Heather’s expressed desire:Based on...
This is what Heather’s expressed desire:
You don't want to just say it's OK to lose a student athlete to the portal," Lyke said. "Every time a student athlete leaves a program, it's an important time for a coach to reflect as to why they're leaving but more importantly, what they could have done differently as a coach.
Lyke's plan for Pitt to weather those storms stems from how she sees relationships, trust and connections between the student-athletes and a program's staff rather than simply the name and reputation of a team or university
"The only way to combat it is to place a high value on the relationship with your student-athletes," Lyke said. "If you study organizational relationship and retention, you find that brand loyalty is less valuable today than ever. It's not about playing for X school, it's about the relationships between the people. We place a stronger emphasis on that and valuing those relationships is the best counter to to the Transfer Portal."
That's where Lyke truly sees Capel as a coach who can make an impact and help Pitt adapt to these times. She's often spoke of his ability to establish a true connection with his players on and off the court
These are the results she received:
How can any conclusions drawn from exit interviews, justify keeping Capel, when the desire is so different from the result?
Easy answer why they kept Capel. It’s been said more than a few times. And you know the answer. You just want to continue to rant and rave so have at it.This is what is Heather’s expressed desire:
You don't want to just say it's OK to lose a student athlete to the portal," Lyke said. "Every time a student athlete leaves a program, it's an important time for a coach to reflect as to why they're leaving but more importantly, what they could have done differently as a coach.
Lyke's plan for Pitt to weather those storms stems from how she sees relationships, trust and connections between the student-athletes and a program's staff rather than simply the name and reputation of a team or university
"The only way to combat it is to place a high value on the relationship with your student-athletes," Lyke said. "If you study organizational relationship and retention, you find that brand loyalty is less valuable today than ever. It's not about playing for X school, it's about the relationships between the people. We place a stronger emphasis on that and valuing those relationships is the best counter to to the Transfer Portal."
That's where Lyke truly sees Capel as a coach who can make an impact and help Pitt adapt to these times. She's often spoke of his ability to establish a true connection with his players on and off the court
These are the results she received:
How can any conclusions drawn from exit interviews, justify keeping Capel, when the desire is so different from the result?
Post should be pinned.Yes, at this point it’s laughable for Pitt to scorn a program like Xavier. It’s not even close.
People have to realize that “school” is a misnomer to associate with revenue sports programs. These are quasi-professional sports and the school name on the uniform may as well as be a company sponsor. It’s just a question of how, not if, slimy a school is willing to allow the program with its name on it to go to be successful. Xavier (and many, many others) clearly is willing to go much further than Pitt is.
It’s crazy to not see this. Dixon, despite a proven coach, can’t draw flies here in his final years … goes to TCU, is permitted to hire shady assistants, and presto, suddenly can draw impressive recruits and annually make tournaments. The same exact thing happens with Stallings and Capel, each not just struggling, but absurdly absolutely bereft in their ability to attract ANYONE here? Come on, they didn’t suddenly forget everything.
The common denominator here is Pitt leadership. As bad as football might be, college basketball is incredibly filthy. It’s totally about payola, and the sleaze extends goes back to junior high age kids, with shady traveling programs, then on into AAU at the high school level, well before colleges dive into the swill. Heck all the foreign basketball leagues that so many lower level players go off into are shady operations as well. How is it even possible that teams in Russia and Israel exist and that so many American players there could barely hit a backboard with their shot can go there and make any kind of sustainable money? Basketball is a giant cesspool. It’s been the world’s worst kept secret for decades.
And Pitt simply won’t allow the program to get into the sewer with the successful programs. So here we are, begging for scraps.
I do think he builds a bond with his players. I don’t read reports of players bad-mouthing him after the fact. I read 1 parent(Horton’s Dad) comment on “what goes on between the lines”is the problem. So my n of 1 suggests the players that leave are disgruntled with lack of productivity which is compounded by losing. Yet he was the only player who left that was considered to play a key role in the few games he was allowed to play. Can’t draw a conclusion from that.This is what is Heather’s expressed desire:
You don't want to just say it's OK to lose a student athlete to the portal," Lyke said. "Every time a student athlete leaves a program, it's an important time for a coach to reflect as to why they're leaving but more importantly, what they could have done differently as a coach.
Lyke's plan for Pitt to weather those storms stems from how she sees relationships, trust and connections between the student-athletes and a program's staff rather than simply the name and reputation of a team or university
"The only way to combat it is to place a high value on the relationship with your student-athletes," Lyke said. "If you study organizational relationship and retention, you find that brand loyalty is less valuable today than ever. It's not about playing for X school, it's about the relationships between the people. We place a stronger emphasis on that and valuing those relationships is the best counter to to the Transfer Portal."
That's where Lyke truly sees Capel as a coach who can make an impact and help Pitt adapt to these times. She's often spoke of his ability to establish a true connection with his players on and off the court
These are the results she received:
How can any conclusions drawn from exit interviews, justify keeping Capel, when the desire is so different from the result?
Post should be pinned.
What is funny, in the 80's, we were "industry leaders' in doing whatever it takes to get players. We all know who we got, we almost got guys like Don MacLean, Brian Williams, Jamal Magliore, Adrian Autry, Brian Reese. Hell, our recruiting was chronicled in Armen Ketiyhen's book.
Now? We think we are the Naval Academy.
On emergency occasions I think Pitt is willing to get in the gutter. The hiring of Graham, desperately needed to counter the outrage over Haywood, I think required a lot of bile swallowing. Coming up with the shekels to get rid of Stallings and still hire Capel.Post should be pinned.
What is funny, in the 80's, we were "industry leaders' in doing whatever it takes to get players. We all know who we got, we almost got guys like Don MacLean, Brian Williams, Jamal Magliore, Adrian Autry, Brian Reese. Hell, our recruiting was chronicled in Armen Ketiyhen's book.
Now? We think we are the Naval Academy.
But then we revert to Puritanism.
It’s not like a recent thing, with one bad luck coach. Dixon (who is highly regarded) suddenly couldn’t attract anyone, he was grasping for any semi warm body by the end. Stallings …. well, he just wasn’t trying very hard for sure, but he also was a coach who had had success, yet was totally stonewalled getting ANYONE. Then Capel, who everyone figured, well he isn’t a brilliant tactician but at least he will upgrade the talent…if only the NUMBERS of players. But then even HE can’t attract ANYONE??? I mean come on.Post should be pinned.
What is funny, in the 80's, we were "industry leaders' in doing whatever it takes to get players. We all know who we got, we almost got guys like Don MacLean, Brian Williams, Jamal Magliore, Adrian Autry, Brian Reese. Hell, our recruiting was chronicled in Armen Ketiyhen's book.
Now? We think we are the Naval Academy.
it has been reported that Pitt “now” has 2 staff members dedicated to following the portal.Can anyone explain how the results on this page jive with Heather’s remarks regarding transfers and coaching staff player interactions referenced in this article?
Pittsburgh Steelers, Penguins, Pirates News, Live Coverage | DK Pittsburgh Sports
Pittsburgh Steelers, Penguins, Pirates News, Live Coverage | DK Pittsburgh Sportswww.dkpittsburghsports.com
While Lyke acknowledges that a mad scramble for instant success isn't the way to run a program year-to-year, she doesn't deny the prevalence of the Transfer Portal in college basketball and how Pitt has to be better at recruiting through it.it has been reported that Pitt “now” has 2 staff members dedicated to following the portal.
It was only after re-reading the article linked above, that I became aware that is because of Lyke.
Lyke believed Capel mishandled portal recruiting last season and suggested/mandated a change.
Wow!
Femi may consider himself to be a PG. Cummings changes that.Or that those involved like Heather or JC are’t totally aware of the players intentions before they enter the portal .
The only player that’s left the program talent wise that I wished had stayed was Toney , while X was much better than Femi he wasn’t making Pitt a winner and his act was getting old .
Losing players from a team with minimal talent shouldn’t bother anyone . Hugley and Burton were the two players that they couldn’t afford to lose .
If JC was a horrible coach to play for why is Nike wanting to stay for another yr ?
Femi leaving is puzzling to me , major minutes at Pitt is far above the talent level he showed . He’s not an ACC level pg it will be interesting to see where he goes and if his play improves .
I agree , I’m sure the knowledge that they wanted to bring in someone to play the point was involved in his decision.Femi may consider himself to be a PG. Cummings changes that.
Well. Not sure where, but on Planet Earth, Nelly Cummings is NOT a Point Guard..I agree , I’m sure the knowledge that they wanted to bring in someone to play the point was involved in his decision.
Why would anyone want to stay and try to improve your skills , easier to move on and find a spot were your better than everyone else .
Call 911 or drive to Western Pysch if you know how to drive and self commit . Try and bring an ID with your actual name on it . Good luck !Well. Not sure where, but on Planet Earth, Nelly Cummings is NOT a Point Guard..
Maybe Bill Belicheck would play him at Point, but..