Originally posted by NTOP:
Besides the obviously successful effort to make $$ w/o ever proving anything. Lots of weak-minded wussies looking for bogeymen under their bed each night. Surprised that Alex isn't at Davos this year, masquerading as a bellhop.
The Moore incident was widely reported. Probably not at the Gint Iggle checkout line, yet.
Not that anybody asked, but I would like to throw an opinion on this.Originally posted by BPKY:
Jones is basically a guy that started his own local cable show and built it into a internet news program. His value to me is that he interviews generals, former CIA and NSA employees, and business leaders who CNN and other MSM outlets won't touch.
Empty criticism coming from a guy who mainlines news propaganda from an organization created by Ted Turner and merged into AOLTime Warner. There's some real conservative bona fides right there, I tells ya!
"The most trusted name in news" LOL.
You don't see me posting repetitive links to InfoWars.com![]()
Originally posted by NTOP:
They should all listen to ME!!! I don't read editorials anywhere.
Originally posted by SoufOaklin4Life:
Well..objectively...
you can't be a mentally healthy person doing that job.
It's pretty much a requirement to be effective is to be a sociopath and dehumanize the targets.
Originally posted by FreeportPanther:
I'm surprised, I had you pegged for someone much older!
very well said Freeport, which is why I don't understand why some liberals are saying that it to perform their duties, you have to be "psycho.'Originally posted by FreeportPanther:
If you tried to make an argument that no part of war is "mentally healthy" for veterans who have experienced it, then you may be on to something.
If you are implying (And I don't think you are) that only mentally unhealthy people choose to be soldiers, then I have a real beef with that.
Millions of "citizen" soldiers were drafted into the services during WW2, Korea, and Viet Nam. They were called upon to do things they would have never considered in their civilian lives. Dropping bombs on cities, shelling broad areas, using things like flame throwers, napalm, land mines, sinking ships full of other sailors, seeing their buddies killed or mutilated. These guys were just like anybody else going in and they did what they had to do to emerge victorious. War isn't a video game and it certainly affects people, some more permanently than others. Thankfully we now recognize things like PTSD and offer help and treatment for this affliction. A lot of GI's emerging from WW2 didn't have that help and many suffered through sad and sorry lives because of it.
Serving one's country during war time is neither a Republican or Democratic virtue, it is an American virtue.
I take it you never flew on ANY commercial airliner that had a Naval/Air Force pilot......only difference of killing 162 is one flight and 30,000 ft. (vs. a sniper in 4 tours of duty and 2,000 ft.).Originally posted by SoufOaklin4Life:
Okay.
You can certainly disagree that normal healthy people can compartmentalize killing lots of people, and return to a normal healthy life back in the real world.
I haven't personally meant many of those folks....and I'd wager, if they can cope that well...it's possible they weren't exactly mentally healthy to begin with.
Originally posted by SoufOaklin4Life:
I'm saying to be in combat, let alone to thrive, you cannot be a mentally healthy person.
And I am saying to be EFFECTIVE as a sniper, you have to be sociopath like in that duty.
I fail to see how that's either insulting or demeaning.
CEO's likewise are sociopaths to be effective as are plenty of other jobs.
They are not roles were having empathy and moral ambiguity are good.
Chris Kyle, frankly... didn't view the Iraqis he was killing as human, he viewed them as sub-human savages...because...he had to. That's not mentally healthy. It's also completely required to be good at that job.
These two truths can exists simultaneously.