I was pretty optimistic about the Davidson game until I got to the Garden. Looking around the arena, Davidson fans seemed to outnumber Pitt fans by about 3 to 1. Not sure how accurate that is because bright red is much more noticeable than dark blue, but they also seemed much more energetic. The Wildcat mascot made a shot from half court, while Roc wasn't even there. My wife noticed that the pep band wasn't the pep band but seemed to be local HS students dressed in Pitt t shirts. The game started, Davidson jumped out to a lead, and Artis picked up his second foul. I started to mentally prepare myself for a big disappointment. Then something started to happen. And that something was named Mike Young.
It wasn't so much that Mike put the team on his back and carried them. It was more like he led the way and everyone followed. I've always thought Young was a very good player, but I now feel like he may be a potential ACC player of the year. As for the team as a whole, I'm usually a little cynical when a team is described as deep because it usually means that there is a boatload of mediocre players. But this game made me feel that maybe Pitt does have a bunch of above average to very good players.
There have been a lot of discussions on this board in the past about playing in NYC. I loved the Big East tournament at MSG, but I have to admit this game and the Cincinnati game there have felt a little bit like the WPIAL championship games at Heinz Field. The venue just seemed too big for the event. I still think that going to NYC is a great idea, however. What has changed for me is that I'm losing the feeling that the Barclays is a lesser alternative to MSG. I have two daughters in their 20s, and they are always telling us that we need to go to Brooklyn. Not for the basketball, but for the restaurants, shopping, etc. As an old guy, I always identified Manhattan and MSG with NYC. I'm starting to realize to what an extent Brooklyn is now a vibrant part of the city and not just some kind of overflow adjacent neighborhood. I had thought of taking the ACC tournament there as kind of settling for not getting MSG, but it's not. Brooklyn is going to be a big deal.
It wasn't so much that Mike put the team on his back and carried them. It was more like he led the way and everyone followed. I've always thought Young was a very good player, but I now feel like he may be a potential ACC player of the year. As for the team as a whole, I'm usually a little cynical when a team is described as deep because it usually means that there is a boatload of mediocre players. But this game made me feel that maybe Pitt does have a bunch of above average to very good players.
There have been a lot of discussions on this board in the past about playing in NYC. I loved the Big East tournament at MSG, but I have to admit this game and the Cincinnati game there have felt a little bit like the WPIAL championship games at Heinz Field. The venue just seemed too big for the event. I still think that going to NYC is a great idea, however. What has changed for me is that I'm losing the feeling that the Barclays is a lesser alternative to MSG. I have two daughters in their 20s, and they are always telling us that we need to go to Brooklyn. Not for the basketball, but for the restaurants, shopping, etc. As an old guy, I always identified Manhattan and MSG with NYC. I'm starting to realize to what an extent Brooklyn is now a vibrant part of the city and not just some kind of overflow adjacent neighborhood. I had thought of taking the ACC tournament there as kind of settling for not getting MSG, but it's not. Brooklyn is going to be a big deal.