Actually that is exactly my feelings. Good or bad, Franklin's great season at Vandy I believe didn't involve playing some of the better schools. He should have won a minimum of 8 -9 games with PSU's schedule last year. He took a great running school and a pretty good QB to mediocrity in 1 year. I was glad when O'Brien left because he was a good coach. I hope Franklin stays forever.
This year will definitely tell if 2014 was an aberration or an actual trend regarding Franklin's coaching ability.
I do think a lot people are drawing conclusions off of 1 year. Those who have done advanced statistics in college football typically conclude things max out by Year 3 of a coach's time at a school --- there is ramp-up time. Who knows, but I do think that if
any individual year of a Coach's career is "forgivable from the point-of-view of being an aberration", it's the first year.
FWIW, the Illinois and Michigan games were winnable, but PSU also snuck out a lot of close games too (Rutgers, UCF, Indiana, BC). I simply don't see "should have won a minimum of 8 to 9 games last year." The team just wasn't particularly good.
Speaking of advanced statistics, if one puts any value in the S&P+ stats (I'm in the data analytic industry myself and think S&P+ is fairly well thought out) on Football Outsiders (link below), PSU actually
over-achieved last year by 0.7 wins, they should have gone 6.3-6.7 given their metrics. Of course, that +0.7 is a -0.3 if the overtime of the BC game goes the other way. Point being, PSU at 7-6 (or 6-7) is essentially exactly right, even w/ some of Franklin's bizarre coaching decisions in those Illinois & Michigan games.
Also FWIW, S&P+ says Vanderbilt won an aggregate 1 game less than they should have (perhaps coaching?) in the 2011-2013 era. Anyhow, that's a data point in regards to Franklin being over-rated a bit at Vandy.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa