ADVERTISEMENT

The Pitt view on athletics and its image

Apr 26, 2012
3,307
1,616
113
On BWI, a Pitt poster started a respectful post about Penn State's rep around the country, and not surprisingly, it led to quite a response. None of us are permitted to respond on their board, so Chris, please allow us to respond here, since this is about Pitt.


One PSU poster asked this question of the Pitt OP about Pitt's reaction if it had suffered the Sandusky child sex scandal:

Suppose this would have happened to Pitt? What would your fanbase, alums, students, faculty, staff have done? We have united as a group (by and large) to stand up for our University and Joe Paterno. Would you have done the same for yours?


This is not some obscure hypothetical that is difficult to answer; it is easy to take the PSU events and imagine they happened to us. I strongly believe that my response here is not some 20/20 hindsight best face answer,but is one that it accurately reflects what the overwhelming majority of Pitt fans and alums would have done at the time.

Yes, we would have stood up for our university. But, we would not have defended the actions and inactions of the individuals involved. We would have condemned them as much as everyone else, maybe more so. We would have defended the university as being much more and much better than the behavior associated with this horrific incident.

But we absolutely would not have run to the defense of our coach. We would expect that he would be immediately fired, and if he wasn't, we would demand it. One could try to claim that the comparison isn't fair since we haven't had a football coach with a long tenure of success. But we wouldn't defend Dixon either, a coach who is a PItt lifer and is very well liked and highly regarded as a person, and who has been successful for long time. He's a coach who took our program out of obscurity and brought it national respect and achieved one of the best winning percentages in the country. If he coaches another 10 years here, he will probably be regarded as our greatest coach of all time in any sport.


The reason we wouldn't defend him in this situation, is that we would accept the facts, and because we simply DON'T WORSHIP COACHES. Our egos are not intertwined with those of our coaches, so if they fall, we don't fall with them. We will never look at any coach anywhere close to the way Penn Staters chose to look at Paterno. Dixon is a successful coach who runs a clean program and who's kids graduate, but we don't regard him as representing all that is right in the world. We admire him and we're glad he's our coach, but he's just a coach. And we understand, no matter how passionate we may be about Pitt football and basketball, we know that sports is, as Myron Cope used to say, "in the toy department of life".

We would supporting rather than attacking our BOT if they fired all involved, as we would get that it would be important to put immediate distance between the university and the individuals involved. We would oppose, not support, personal lawsuits by those fired against the university, because the university would come first, not a sports program or a sports coach.
I'm very sure that most Pitt fans would take this approach.

This post was edited on 2/27 10:11 AM by raleighpanther
 
Well stated. There'd be damn few cult-like dissenters.

Crimes against kids are the worst. Makes me question my opposition to the death penalty.
 
Re: Well stated. There'd be damn few cult-like dissenters.

... And a very tangible difference that in Pittsburgh... the perpetrator would have been billy-clubbed by Pittsburgh Police (justifiably so) and spent his nights in a holding cell block before being moved to the general population IMMEDIATELY.... instead of being protected by a society and community who has more of a vested interest in PROTECTING THE MOTHERSHIP.... As different as many of us posters are on this site, I am hard-pressed to think of one who would be having a vigil on Forbes Avenue....
 
We're not a cult. Hell, we're barely a fanbase LOL. Very few would voice support for the football program. Most people would completely bail. And Pitt would shut down the program for at least a few seasons.
 
Re: Well stated. There'd be damn few cult-like dissenters.

Protecting the mothership... Shame on them !
 
Re: Well stated. There'd be damn few cult-like dissenters.

I've stated this before, but if this happened at Pitt I would never give the school another penny, I would never wear anything Pitt related again, and I would be completely fine if we never played another football game.

You can't defend anything that happened there. Absolutely nothing. Everyone who was associated with this should die in prison. I really believe that's what will happen in the end with Schultz, Spanier and Curley....and if Joe was still alive, it's where he would have ended up as well.

It's the most disgusting scandal in the history of American sports. Good riddance to all of them and anyone who tries to defend it.
 
Originally posted by raleighpanther:







We would supporting rather than attacking our BOT if they fired all involved, as we would get that it would be important to put immediate distance between the university and the individuals involved. We would oppose, not support, personal lawsuits by those fired against the university, because the university would come first, not a sports program or a sports coach.
I'm very sure that most Pitt fans would take this approach.
The biggest difference between Pitt and PSU is that the large majority of Pitt alumni and students do not inextricably link the football program with the name and stature of the entire university. Any issue resulting from the athletic department would be isolated and the proper people thrown to the wolves.

The entire thing would be handled as swiftly as possible and never mentioned again. Think of the Haywood debacle.
 
It's easy. Any normal, adjusted person would demand immediately suspending the football program and a complete and sweeping removal of all football staff, a thorough housecleaning of the athletic administration, and dismissal of all upper university administrators with any whiff of complacency in the sick affair. Priority #1 would be to bring in new, outside leadership for the university before reinstating the football program.

Pitt is too critical of an institution to Western PA, and its missions too important, to be jeopardized by any single component. What component that is is actually irrelevant. Corrected hierarchy, procedures, and values would have to be installed and promulgated, and if that meant keeping a infracting component shut down until that was ensured, so be it. And unless Pitt operated in a manner reflective of this, I certainly wouldn't defend or support it.

This post was edited on 2/27 11:40 AM by CrazyPaco
 
When did we fire Wanny? Dec '10? If so, I wrote a letter to Nordy 1/1/11 that I would never donate to Pitt, attend another athletic or other event or even associate myself with Pitt if they did not fire Haywood immediately after the news broke that he assaulted his baby mama. I didn't care if it cost us legal liability. That was my experience. Granted he was on the job for two weeks, but that was what I did. I would do the same if it was Jamie.

You bet your sweet ass that the Pittsburgh/ Regional/ National/ Global media would have sent hundreds of journalists/broadcasters to Oakland until this day to get to the bottom of the child sex scandal involving Pitt coaches and administrators. However, since The City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County is not dependent on the success or failure of Pitt sports, the right thing would have been done by the media. They would do their job!

Here is the main reason the cult has flourished. PSU is in the middle of nowhere and the "journalists" are in their hip pocket. No PSU, no journalists, no jobs, no nuthin. Just trees, streams and mountains. Can't kill the golden goose. Just can't.

If it wasn't for Paterno, PSU would be Clarion, Lockhaven, Slippery Rock et. al. They all know it.
 
Excellent, excellent post Raleigh. As I read the premise of your post I began formulating my own answer, and I must say I couldn't have responded half as good as you did. Putting things in a realistic context of if this happened with Dixon is appropriate. Further, if Chancellor Nordenberg was involved - a man who is even more revered by many than Dixon and who has done as much to help Pitt as Paterno purportedly did for PSU - I know the general reaction would be shock, sadness, confusion and condemnation. We would immediately demand to know why more wasn't done. Why Dixon (in the hypothetical case) hadn't taken direct action. We would be forced to question their motives if they themselves weren't sickened by the crimes - or even the scant evidence of this most heinous crime. As many are saying, I can guarantee that would be our reaction since we do not worship our leaders, let alone our coaches. If that makes us a little less "fanatical" so be it. A worthy trade off.
 
Completely agree Paco. With the exact same circumstances and whether you believe all the things or not in the various reports, the simple fact was a sexual predator who is convicted now without question was part of the program for an extended period of time despite an investigation in to him and rampant rumors for year. Not only that, but some of those some kids being molested were being brought around the PSU program as "incentive" over a long period of time.

As an alumni, season ticket holder, and donor to Pitt academics and athletics (football and basketball) and under the exact same circumstances and even cloudy information, I would have cleaned complete house from the President to AD to senior level staff within the AD, the entire football coaching staff, etc if it was the exact same scenario as PSU where the same staff that was there for the molestation period was still there. I would have looked independently to an outside party to see what else was potentially done even outside of this case and made it completely transparent. I would have been in favor of a minimum of one year ban to the program. Certainly would be pouting over record book wins over everything else, thats for damn sure. And then I would hope Pitt would become an even more transparent university and be looked at as leading new changes with academia and college athletics for both abuse and other issues.

At the same time, I dont think something like this would happen at Pitt. Too much oversight and not a closed society.
 
Hard to believe this is even a question...lol. I still find their response to these events as inconceivable. However, I have met so many joebots...I don't know why I am shocked.
 
Raleigh - Good post and agree on all points.

I hope and trust if we ever had a situation like this come up that we would do the right thing. I have heard many times that the only reason SMU was caught was because they were located in an urban area with lots of checks and balances.
 
They stood up for Joe Paterno and their University because, to them, it is one and the same thing. THAT is what makes them a cult, and THAT is why what happened there could ONLY have happened there, and maybe a few other places, although it's hard to think of any other places where the identity of the university and the community are so wrapped up in one individual.
 
Thanks guys. You've all confirmed my belief that I was expressing a widely supported view, not just my own. And this reaction of ours is not some morally righteous position; it is, as Paco put it, the easy decision, one that any normal, self-adjusted person would make.
 
Originally posted by vinniep33:


You bet your sweet ass that the Pittsburgh/ Regional/ National/ Global media would have sent hundreds of journalists/broadcasters to Oakland until this day to get to the bottom of the child sex scandal involving Pitt coaches and administrators. However, since The City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County is not dependent on the success or failure of Pitt sports, the right thing would have been done by the media. They would do their job!

Here is the main reason the cult has flourished. PSU is in the middle of nowhere and the "journalists" are in their hip pocket. No PSU, no journalists, no jobs, no nuthin. Just trees, streams and mountains. Can't kill the golden goose. Just can't.
This is a critical aspect that conveniently is ignored by, of course, the media but unfortunately even many on these boards, who should know better. Specifically, thar the media is a huge reason that the serial boy rapes occurred, and that there has been no punishment for it, and that, indeed, PSU is just as bad if not worse now than then, in terms of an environment where such serial crimes could occur again

First, the crimes (at least the initial) could absolutely happen anywhere. Truly anywhere. Where you work. Me too. And Pitt, too. There are sick pervs all over.

I'll even grant that it's not even out of the realm of impossible that Pitt would try to cover up the initial story. Sadly, human nature applies, and a lot of humans have a gather the wagons mentality, esp in big organizations.

Two critical differences ...

1. Once discovered, Pitt (nor most) wouldn't have allowed it to continue. And worse, certainly wouldn't have continued to enable and facilitate it, as PSU clearly did. Forget even about not reporting it to police, or hiding it, heinous enough as thar is. Can you under any circumstances picture that Jamie Dixon, Pederson and Nordenberg, having learned, say, Slice was raping boys in Pitt showers, would continue to give him access to repeatedly keep doing so? Continued to let him have association with a Pitt-affiliated childrens charity, basically a personal brothel for a pedophile? And continue giving him royal treatment (access to presidents box at games, etc? ). Even if they were completely unfeeling indifferent cretins, they'd prevent continuation just because its smart BUSINESS to stop it, if nothing else!

2. And even if Pitt HAD sickeningly tried to do this, no WAY the media would have been complicit in the LEAST like it was (still is) for PSU. The media's complicity is ABSOLUTELY a major reason it could happen there...and could yet again. As you say, at Pitt, the minute the first HINT of the RUMOR of such a scandal leaked (as it did up there at least in 1998 and far earlier as well), the local media would SWARM on it. And once established as true, it would be a feeding frenzy. Sure, national interest would peak then quickly fade, as it did with PSU. Sad (since this also helped to let PSU off the hook), but typical of national media. But local media here would STILL be ruthlessly digging ... papers would STILL feature front page articles, "breaking news" features at 6, and the like. Geez, just see that incident of the Pitt professor (requisite description) who poisoned his doctor wife. STILL getting breathless coverage, over a year later. Even though Pitt's association is completely BENIGN in that case, Pitt has been made somewhat of a Co conspirator based on the insinuating headlines.

So never worry, while an initial rape could certainly happen, a repeat of PSU could never happen at Pitt ... and in this case, thank God.




This post was edited on 2/27 2:44 PM by geeman2001
 
I would probably be done

I would never attend another football game again, at least not in the next 10 years. Would also take a long, long time to do anything involving the University.
 
Originally posted by raleighpanther:


On BWI, a Pitt poster started a respectful post about Penn State's rep around the country, and not surprisingly, it led to quite a response. None of us are permitted to respond on their board, so Chris, please allow us to respond here, since this is about Pitt.



One PSU poster asked this question of the Pitt OP about Pitt's reaction if it had suffered the Sandusky child sex scandal:


Suppose this would have happened to Pitt? What would your fanbase, alums, students, faculty, staff have done? We have united as a group (by and large) to stand up for our University and Joe Paterno. Would you have done the same for yours?



This is not some obscure hypothetical that is difficult to answer; it is easy to take the PSU events and imagine they happened to us. I strongly believe that my response here is not some 20/20 hindsight best face answer,but is one that it accurately reflects what the overwhelming majority of Pitt fans and alums would have done at the time.


Yes, we would have stood up for our university. But, we would not have defended the actions and inactions of the individuals involved. We would have condemned them as much as everyone else, maybe more so. We would have defended the university as being much more and much better than the behavior associated with this horrific incident.

But we absolutely would not have run to the defense of our coach. We would expect that he would be immediately fired, and if he wasn't, we would demand it. One could try to claim that the comparison isn't fair since we haven't had a football coach with a long tenure of success. But we wouldn't defend Dixon either, a coach who is a PItt lifer and is very well liked and highly regarded as a person, and who has been successful for long time. He's a coach who took our program out of obscurity and brought it national respect and achieved one of the best winning percentages in the country. If he coaches another 10 years here, he will probably be regarded as our greatest coach of all time in any sport.



The reason we wouldn't defend him in this situation, is that we would accept the facts, and because we simply DON'T WORSHIP COACHES. Our egos are not intertwined with those of our coaches, so if they fall, we don't fall with them. We will never look at any coach anywhere close to the way Penn Staters chose to look at Paterno. Dixon is a successful coach who runs a clean program and who's kids graduate, but we don't regard him as representing all that is right in the world. We admire him and we're glad he's our coach, but he's just a coach. And we understand, no matter how passionate we may be about Pitt football and basketball, we know that sports is, as Myron Cope used to say, "in the toy department of life".

We would supporting rather than attacking our BOT if they fired all involved, as we would get that it would be important to put immediate distance between the university and the individuals involved. We would oppose, not support, personal lawsuits by those fired against the university, because the university would come first, not a sports program or a sports coach.
I'm very sure that most Pitt fans would take this approach.


This post was edited on 2/27 10:11 AM by raleighpanther
Here's the main difference. Penn State is a football team that also offers classes, majors, and degrees. Pitt is a university that happens to have a football team. Penn State IS football. Everything about Penn State is football. Without football, there's no Penn State. Think about that. If the university cancelled the football program forever, I believe the school would eventually shut down or at least be a shadow of what it is. On the contrary, Pitt football is part of the university but nowhere close to the be-all, end-all. Much to the chagrin of many of us, it has been treated like the Biology Department or Engineering Department and viewed as its equal. At Penn State, football is taken more seriously than anything.

So, of course Pitt fans and Penn State fans are going to react different. You can't mess with Penn State football. Its EVERYTHING to that school.
 
If the same happened at Pitt....

I will give the same answer I gave on Bob Schmuck-zik blog when this was asked by a poster a year or two back.

I would stop any association with Pitt and become a huge supporter and fan of WVU

Some things just can not be forgiven
 
Here is something else we wouldn't do...

We would never, and I'm quite sure most fan bases wouldn't either, bash the victims families. But on BWI, they went there big-time in this discussion. Here are several poster's views, all expressing a 'screw the families' attitude:


"The families of the victims deserve NO consideration. ..The victims were only involved with The Second Mile because they came from dysfunctional family situations. ..The families deserve way more blame than they are getting."


"Sandusky's purported victims were in the Second Mile because of problems in their homes! There parents/guardians were the ultimate blame!

Are you really saying that since these absent fathers were the boys' family members that we should give a rat's a$$ about how they feel about US? Why? They abandoned their kid and he got abused after hooking up with Jerry's grooming charity.


Wow. So, for the mother who had her husband walk out on her and the kids, shame on her for getting her kid involved in an organization set up and headed by Penn State's much admired defensive coordinator, laden with other Penn State personnel, built to provide guidance and adult male mentoring for boys like her son! What was she thinking; to them, its her fault.

One poster mocked the OPs quote "The families of the victims deserve better" by pasting a picture of a woman lying on a bed covered with cash.
They are really a sad bunch.

Oh, and they claim that they now don't care what others think of them. LOL.


I stopped caring a long time ago about what others think about PSU.


I have an extremely high opinion of PSU, thanks for asking! I don't really care what others think.


Most Penn Staters I know are to the point where we simply don't care what the perception or the rest of the country thinks.


That's hard to believe, since for decades they cared so, so much what others thought of them, spending so much time and energy trumpeting a positive image of their program, with slogans like Success with honor, the Penn State Way, the
Grand Experiment and so on. And they now spend so much time trying to craft and push a defensive narrative of the scandal to get the world to respect them again.


Another poster said: I think I can speak for most here in that what we want for YOU and the general public at large is to become enlightened.
Really? Why? I thought you didn't care what we think?


These guys are not very good at expressing their true feelings. What they really mean is, if you have a bad opinion of us, then go screw yourself. That seems more accurate. But do they still do care what people think about them? Oh, yeah they do, a lot. They just know that for much of the country, what people think isn't good, and its not going to change. What they fail to realize, is that their obsessive activity in defense of Joe solidifies the world's negative opinion of Penn State, and makes it that much worse.




This post was edited on 2/27 5:56 PM by raleighpanther
 
Re: Here is something else we wouldn't do...

Who wants my two tickets for the Ped U game in '16? East club. I'm afraid I'll kill somebody. I wonder if they'll let me wear hand cuffs or a straight jacket.
 
Re: Here is something else we wouldn't do...

Vinnie, if you wear a straight jacket.. You could be assured a cowardly lion would take his best shot.

This game will be monumental... I would think the National Guard will be called.
 
Simply put...Pitt and its fans don't deify their leadership, sports or academic related. In fact, if anything Pitt fans are overly critical of anything even remotely performance related.
 
You folks are not comparing reputation apples to apples. What if the same thing happened within Thomas Starzl's transplant group?
 
It is a certainty that the trials of the former Chancellor, Ad and head of security would have occured by now had this happened in Pittsburgh and with Pitt people.

"Justice" is a relative term in Centre County.
 
Well Joepor, it took one of you a long time to say what was absolutely expected from your cult-like minds -- JoePa's rep was so freaking awesome, how could we compare any coach in America to him?
Paterno's overblown positive image was the result of a massive PR campaign and a (you'll be familiar with this term) false, media-driven narrative.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT