ADVERTISEMENT

To those crying about JD being "forced out"

PittPanthers90

Sophomore
Oct 30, 2003
2,301
1,032
113
1) Get real

2) If you really need a school that has to keep a coach beyond his years, there is a "Cult of personality" school due east. We don't need PSU-like sycophants as fans!
 
1) Get real

2) If you really need a school that has to keep a coach beyond his years, there is a "Cult of personality" school due east. We don't need PSU-like sycophants as fans!

Jamie is 50, not in his 80's.

He made the tournament 11 of 13 years. If whomever the new guy is can do that I would say Pitt will be very fortunate.
 
Doesn't change the point that Dixon left of his own volition largely because he's an ultra sensitive egotist. A guy whose team can't break 45 in an NCAA tournament game should take and be big enough to take heat got his team's embarrassing performance.

Did he even give a damn about that game? I think his mind was elsewhere as the negotiations had been going on for a while
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
Did he even give a damn about that game? I think his mind was elsewhere as the negotiations had been going on for a while
When do you think he started talking to TCU given how quickly he wrapped up his deal? You can bet it was before friday!
 
Well, Kiwi, you seem to be going through every thread searching for posters who aren't in your judgment in a state of sufficient mourning over Dixon's departure. Is your loyalty to Pitt or Dixon?
Who cried? You seem to even agree he was pushed a little.
 
Yup - this did not just happen in the last 2 days. It probably explains why ANO played so much.
He forgot Luther was the one who got the team in the dance in the 1st place. He was too busy adding up stock options between both schools.
 
He played the two irrelevant seniors the last game he coached at Pitt...why because he felt he owed them and he'd never see Luther again..gave a rats behind about the outcome ...that's what it looked like to a lot of people..heard it multiple times.
 
We have some real classless folks on this board, and several of them are posting in this thread.
 
No, my point was that for Dixon to have wrapped up his deal by mid-day today, Dixon had to have been talking to TCU before friday. The contract is too complicated for the discussoins to have begun some time Saturday and concluded by today when the negotiations also included Pitt negotiating with TCU about the amount of the buyout. Dixon evidently learned how to do these deals from his mentor, Howland, who began talking to UCLA before Pitt had even been eliminated from the NCAA tournie. I find this conduct despicable.


Obviously... Perhaps it was Dixon that was hanging out at the Casino? Ok, that is a low jab, but he had it coming to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPanthers90
No, my point was that for Dixon to have wrapped up his deal by mid-day today, Dixon had to have been talking to TCU before friday. The contract is too complicated for the discussoins to have begun some time Saturday and concluded by today when the negotiations also included Pitt negotiating with TCU about the amount of the buyout. Dixon evidently learned how to do these deals from his mentor, Howland, who began talking to UCLA before Pitt had even been eliminated from the NCAA tournie. I find this conduct despicable.
No way I can refute that, so I won't try. Do you think Barnes could have been part of the discussion. It is being widely reported that Barnes "wasn't sorry to see Dixon go". Sometimes in management, at least where I work, if someone isn't working out for whatever reason, that person is helped along the way. They don't just sit back and hope the person leaves. If Barnes and Dixon were having disputes on scheduling and or staff, I could see this being evident to both parties that they needed to work on something. I don't think that's so far fetched, happens in business, and this is business. Not that any of this matters one way or the other. The end result remains the same.
 
No way I can refute that, so I won't try. Do you think Barnes could have been part of the discussion. It is being widely reported that Barnes "wasn't sorry to see Dixon go". Sometimes in management, at least where I work, if someone isn't working out for whatever reason, that person is helped along the way. They don't just sit back and hope the person leaves. If Barnes and Dixon were having disputes on scheduling and or staff, I could see this being evident to both parties that they needed to work on something. I don't think that's so far fetched, happens in business, and this is business. Not that any of this matters one way or the other. The end result remains the same.
I suppose anything's possible but I can't imagine any AD countenancing a guy coaching his university's team in any game, let alone the NCAA tournament, knowing full well his loyalties were divided when the game was being played. I believe an AD would name an assistant an interim HC before he would be amenable too that sort of arrangement. On some rare occasions you may in the past have seen a FB coach coach a bowl game after he has agreed to take another job but that has become rarer and rarer.
 
Doesn't change the point that Dixon left of his own volition largely because he's an ultra sensitive egotist. A guy whose team can't break 45 in an NCAA tournament game should take and be big enough to take heat got his team's embarrassing performance.

If he were an egotist, he would have stayed.

He knew it was time to go. Let's give he credit for seeing that and knowing it was time for his to go in a different direction, something which was best for all.

I suggest we wish him well and start looking forward to where our program goes from here.
 
He played the two irrelevant seniors the last game he coached at Pitt...why because he felt he owed them and he'd never see Luther again..gave a rats behind about the outcome ...that's what it looked like to a lot of people..heard it multiple times.

Really?

If he felt he need to play the irrelevant seniors, why did he only play Sterling Smith for 2 minutes.
 
He didn't play seniors because he thought he owed them. That's a ridiculous assertion. He didn't play Luther because like often times he over coached and played to his fears of losing in the Ncaa's. But that feels like piling on. He was a great coach and a good guy, good luck to him! Hope he has a great life and rest of his career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KiwiJeff
If he were an egotist, he would have stayed.

He knew it was time to go. Let's give he credit for seeing that and knowing it was time for his to go in a different direction, something which was best for all.

I suggest we wish him well and start looking forward to where our program goes from here.
I saw this in your Dribbles but honestly think you have this backwards. Do I think that Dixon is a good guy? Yes. However, I think he is very thin skinned and most people are thin skinned because their ego can't take the criticism of any type. This is how I see Dixon. His ego would not, could not allow him to face the inevitable music he was going to have to face after last friday's game. All that music is inconsistent with is self-view. Hell, he couldn't wait to jump off the boat. He didn't want to be Pitt's coach for a millisecond when he returned to Pittsburgh. He could not conceive of being criticized for that game. Sorry but that's all about pride and ego.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Piranha
I saw this in your Dribbles but honestly think you have this backwards. Do I think that Dixon is a good guy? Yes. However, I think he is very thin skinned and most people are thin skinned because their ego can't take the criticism of any type. This is how I see Dixon. His ego would not, could not allow him to face the inevitable music he was going to have to face after last friday's game. All that music is inconsistent with is self-view. Hell, he couldn't wait to jump off the boat. He didn't want to be Pitt's coach for a millisecond when he returned to Pittsburgh. He could not conceive of being criticized for that game. Sorry but that's all about pride and ego.

I think you are defining ego backwards, but I see your point. Semantics.

Regardless, the issue, as I've come to understand it had nothing to do in any way, shape or form with that single game.

When enough people who matter don't want you around anymore, it's often just better for all parties involved that you go on your way.

I think if he had a huge ego, he would have battled these folks to a much uglier end.
 
I think you are defining ego backwards, but I see your point. Semantics.

Regardless, the issue, as I've come to understand it had nothing to do in any way, shape or form with that single game.

When enough people who matter don't want you around anymore, it's often just better for all parties involved that you go on your way.

I think if he had a huge ego, he would have battled these folks to a much uglier end.

Now you are seeing the light DT.

"When enough people who matter dont want you"

Ding Ding Ding. Winner.
 
I think you are defining ego backwards, but I see your point. Semantics.

Regardless, the issue, as I've come to understand it had nothing to do in any way, shape or form with that single game.

When enough people who matter don't want you around anymore, it's often just better for all parties involved that you go on your way.

I think if he had a huge ego, he would have battled these folks to a much uglier end.


Case in point, Dave wannstedt exiting pitt.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT