ADVERTISEMENT

Top interview questions for future Pitt FB Head coach...

#99HUGHgreen

Sophomore
Jun 19, 2013
2,078
1,127
113
1. Would you change your play calling which had been very successful the entire game to play calling that was very conservative with a very small chance for success -if you were tied or up in the fourth Quarter- believing your defense will win the game?

2. Are you much more likely to start and stick with a QB who manages the game or one who you have confidence can actually help win a game at the end?

3. If your starting CBs (who you claim are the best on the team) continue to give up record yardage to the the opposing QBs and WRs they play against, would you stick with them all season and claim they are "just missing on little things here and there" or would you be willing to admit there are bigger issues and try other options?

Feel free to submit questions that you feel should be included?
 
  • Like
Reactions: haberton13
1. How do you like the new flying cars?

2. Did you vote for current president Michelle Obama?

Ie Narduzzi should be here a long time
 
1. Are you prepared to deal with a fanbase that wants to run you off after the first bad loss, and if you don't win a division title in your second year?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4Mark_Marty
1. How do you like the new flying cars?

2. Did you vote for current president Michelle Obama?

Ie Narduzzi should be here a long time


Just so it's clear, I am in no way suggesting we run Narduzzi out of town. I am still big on the guy. It's just a playful way to let off steam and point out some of the painful, reoccurring issues with this Pitt team and other ones from the past.

I actually think PN will learn from his mistakes. I hope Canada does too.
 
Just so it's clear, I am in no way suggesting we run Narduzzi out of town. I am still big on the guy. It's just a playful way to let off steam and point out some of the painful, reoccurring issues with this Pitt team and other ones from the past.

I actually think PN will learn from his mistakes. I hope Canada does too.

This board is a great way to let off steam and it is harmless except to those that take it too seriously.
 
I think the problem is he's playing the best he has . Having your coach come out and say I have no confidence in my guys that they frickin stink isn't going to help.
 
This isn't JM 1 were they brought in ( bought ) in 100 players . He needs time , ya think he doesn't knew what he needs ?
 
Is it true our wide receivers are allergic to the FB? Have they instituted a new rule that it's a penalty to throw a pass down the middle of the field? We've heard about the bend but don't break defensive strategy, is it true this team is trying to master the break, explode and disappear strategy in order to exhaust the other team's offense?
 
The next time we have a head coaching opening, I want either:

a) an Urban Meyer disciple
b) the best recruiter out there

I dont want some hotshot coordinator who had success with guys the HV recruited. Give me some big-time recruiter and I'll take my chances with better players.
 
This isn't JM 1 were they brought in ( bought ) in 100 players . He needs time , ya think he doesn't knew what he needs ?

Except that these past two loses were not due just to a lack of talent on the field for Pittt. Pitt had enough of it to win both games. Much of the problem has to do with decisions coaches made late in the game or (in the case of the DB) for much of the game.

Pitt fans are desperate to see a coach who can take what he has and at least out coach his opponents for 4 qtrs. They are aching for a coach who can actually get his team to finish off an opponent they have on the ropes at the end of a game. Fans would be ecstatic to see a coach in place who can consistently land enough talented recruits to allow him to compete with the best teams. Pitt fans would love to see in place the type of coach who recognizes mistakes he and his team make quickly and can knows how to correct them.

Narduzzi may eventually be that guy. But the past couple of games have shown a coach who does certain things well but also seems to be ignoring that he's not doing other things well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT