it’s interesting that despite his stance on endless wars that Trump still surrounds himself and supports neocons who are diametrically opposed to his policies
Two recent examples are his endorsement of his “good friend Lady G. If there ever was a shit bag politician that is university hated by everyone who supports Trump and is 180 opposite of Trump on foreign policy and trade it’s this closet homo. This is another wtf trump endorsement
Then there’s his selection of Walz (who’s never seen a war he hasn’t liked) and his defense of Walz in this signal gate nonsense. Walz has lied about knowing Goldberg and there’s evidence that Walz added him.
So what do the neocons have on Trump ? The fact that he’s doing the bidding of Israel and inching closer to war with Iran is likely the answer. It’s almost as if Trump is working to alienate his base with his endorsement of Lady G and continue support for Walz
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Two recent examples are his endorsement of his “good friend Lady G. If there ever was a shit bag politician that is university hated by everyone who supports Trump and is 180 opposite of Trump on foreign policy and trade it’s this closet homo. This is another wtf trump endorsement
Then there’s his selection of Walz (who’s never seen a war he hasn’t liked) and his defense of Walz in this signal gate nonsense. Walz has lied about knowing Goldberg and there’s evidence that Walz added him.
So what do the neocons have on Trump ? The fact that he’s doing the bidding of Israel and inching closer to war with Iran is likely the answer. It’s almost as if Trump is working to alienate his base with his endorsement of Lady G and continue support for Walz

DEVELOPING: Was Mike Waltz a Source for Jeffrey Goldberg While Serving on House Intel Committee? | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
In a revealing turn of events, Mike Waltz faces scrutiny over his connections with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, raising questions about transparency and trust within the Trump administration. This unfolding story highlights the complexities of political alliances.
