Trump says

[SoufOaklin4Life]

Haha.

Angry again?

You are so obsessed with trying to prove me wrong on anything...you resort to lies and desperation.

Humorous.

No lies, no anger.
You made a couple of statements of opinions...I tested to see if you would be consistent.
You weren't.
The end.

 

[SoufOaklin4Life]

End NAFTA now.

It's amusing that add that plank accomplished exactly what was expected to do.... As far as being bad for American jobs....

Now let's pretend it wasn't a conservative idea, right?

 

[deepelemblues]

The Rock said it better. All the way down Jabroni Drive to the penthouse suite of the Smackdown Hotel.

 

[BPKY]

It's amusing that add that plank accomplished exactly what was expected to do.... As far as being bad for American jobs....

Now let's pretend it wasn't a conservative idea, right?

Under what passes today for conservatism, I guess you could say it was; but, It was definitely a Republican and Globalist idea.

 

[NCPitt]

No lies, no anger.
You made a couple of statements of opinions...I tested to see if you would be consistent.
You weren't.
The end.

Completely consistent.

Your desperate attempts are getting lame.

 

[SoufOaklin4Life]

Under what passes today for conservatism, I guess you could say it was; but, It was definitely a Republican and Globalist idea.

For what passes for conservatism in the early 1990s as well. There is a reason why Heritage Foundation and other think tanks advocated for it.

Trump is also for Socialized medicine for those who can't afford private plans.

per 60 minutes last night.

 

[SoufOaklin4Life]

Completely consistent.

Your desperate attempts are getting lame.

Yes...consistent like I said. IF you agree with the content, it's objective. If you don't, it's not.
That's all. There isn't any debate. I just pointed it out.

 

[happjack]

That's only one way to show bias.

Another way is the selection of issues presented. For example, there was little mention of Hillary's e-mail problems on the networks until they had to somehow explain her falling polls. Another example is the lack of coverage on the networks of the Planned Parenthood videos. If you watched the big 3, you wouldn't even know the videos existed.

You can't really compare the amount of coverage a story gets on the network evening news to the coverage the story can get on the cable news channels. When you take out the re-runs they show overnight the cable news channels have around 18 hours of day to fill with content, the networks have 22 minutes each day to fill.

No story on the network news shows get more than 4 minutes tops with the average at around 2 minutes maybe. The network Sunday morning shows all covered the Clinton email story and the Planned Parenthood video story and all three of the networks devoted space to the stories on their websites.

Also CNN and MSNBC covered both stories in-between their all Trump all the time coverage.

 

[NCPitt]

Yes...consistent like I said. IF you agree with the content, it's objective. If you don't, it's not.
That's all. There isn't any debate. I just pointed it out.

I never said that. Yet again, you made it up.

Desperation...and laughable in it childishness.

 

[NCPitt]

You can't really compare the amount of coverage a story gets on the network evening news to the coverage the story can get on the cable news channels. When you take out the re-runs they show overnight the cable news channels have around 18 hours of day to fill with content, the networks have 22 minutes each day to fill.

No story on the network news shows get more than 4 minutes tops with the average at around 2 minutes maybe. The network Sunday morning shows all covered the Clinton email story and the Planned Parenthood video story and all three of the networks devoted space to the stories on their websites.

Also CNN and MSNBC covered both stories in-between their all Trump all the time coverage.

Excuses. They have time for entertainment stories though.

There is no reason for the ZERO coverage given to both issues until weeks/months after they became news...except partisanship.

The fact that they are covering these issues more recently doesn't excuse their previous absence. It makes them look even more partisan when they wait until the general population recognize issues as important.

 

[happjack]

Excuses. They have time for entertainment stories though.

There is no reason for the ZERO coverage given to both issues until weeks/months after they became news...except partisanship.

The fact that they are covering these issues more recently doesn't excuse their previous absence. It makes them look even more partisan when they wait until the general population recognize issues as important.

There is a reason the Planned Parenthood video got zero coverage initially, that's because the whole video was B.S. and even with the heavy editing nothing that was talked about was actually illegal. Everything that happened afterwards like the potential shutdown of the Government over the video and a Presidential candidate out right lying about what she saw in the video is news.

The Clinton email story got coverage from the start, do you want ABC, CBS and NBC to preempt the rest of their schedule and bleed into their affiliates programming time to cover a story that is still unfolding? On a daily basis there isn't that much to cover so it's going to be a quick mention on the nightly news, the cable news channels are the places to go for more coverage(mainly people arguing over it).

Also who's watching the network nightly news anymore? People waiting for the lottery numbers and senior citizens who keep their tv tuned to channel 2 waiting for Bill Burns to come on.

 

[NCPitt]

There is a reason the Planned Parenthood video got zero coverage initially, that's because the whole video was B.S. and even with the heavy editing nothing that was talked about was actually illegal. Everything that happened afterwards like the potential shutdown of the Government over the video and a Presidential candidate out right lying about what she saw in the video is news.

The Clinton email story got coverage from the start, do you want ABC, CBS and NBC to preempt the rest of their schedule and bleed into their affiliates programming time to cover a story that is still unfolding? On a daily basis there isn't that much to cover so it's going to be a quick mention on the nightly news, the cable news channels are the places to go for more coverage(mainly people arguing over it).

Also who's watching the network nightly news anymore? People waiting for the lottery numbers and senior citizens who keep their tv tuned to channel 2 waiting for Bill Burns to come on.

There IS a reason the PP videos got zero coverage. It's called a progressive ideology.

As to the email,

Who watches network news? The people who vote.