Bird in the hand is worth two in the bush!Has to be one of the dumbest guys in the history of civilized man!
You harass a woman who is on campus talking about being a victim of harassment and assault ?Has to be one of the dumbest guys in the history of civilized man!
You harass a woman who is on campus talking about being a victim of harassment and assault ?
What a effin creep
and yet you have no suspicions about her intentions.....odd....poor gal was so harassed she was physically unable to hang up a phone for over 30 minutes...not to mention a bevy of similar length calls over their time together..You harass a woman who is on campus talking about being a victim of harassment and assault ?
What a effin creep
Hope he enjoyed that 6 minutes. It only cost him $80 million. LMAO.Has to be one of the dumbest guys in the history of civilized man!
Guessing MSU will want to avoid discovery and go straight to a settlement. Should probably make the donor pay for it that paid for the stupid contract.His inevitable lawsuit against MSU should be fun from a spectator's standpoint.
Huh? This is about how F'in stupid he was to have picked a sex assault victim and prominent anti-sex assault advocate that he hired to lecture his team on the subject of sexual abuse and assault to get weird with. I mean, who would do that? It only cost him $80 million. I mean its just hilarious.and yet you have no suspicions about her.....odd....poor gal was so harassed she was physically unable to hang up a phone for over 30 minutes...
It wasn't the best idea from him to engage in that trelationship.
But, I do find it odd that she would engage in that relationship, and then be upset because her partner basically had phone sex with her? He lost $80 million and his career because he basically pleasured himself while on the phone with his girefriend? Seems a bit of an uneven punishment.
But he simply won't be allowed to question it. Nor will ANYONE in the mainstream media.
Whatever the settlement is, I am certain it will be less than the buy out of his absurd 10 year contract. I have no idea what MSU was thinking with that.Guessing MSU will want to avoid discovery and go straight to a settlement. Should probably make the donor pay for it that paid for the stupid contract.
He was fired with causeand yet you have no suspicions about her intentions.....odd....poor gal was so harassed she was physically unable to hang up a phone for over 30 minutes...not to mention a bevy of similar length calls over their time together..
I reserve judgement on this until I know more...don't think it is over.
Guessing the last time you said what effin creeps was in regards to a certain ACC Lacrosse team or a certain ACC school's fraternity...
What lawsuit ?Guessing MSU will want to avoid discovery and go straight to a settlement. Should probably make the donor pay for it that paid for the stupid contract.
Whatever the settlement is, I am certain it will be less than the buy out of his absurd 10 year contract. I have no idea what MSU was thinking with that.
They are 12-14 in conference since he was hired.
The contract was idiotic and you’d better believe this is the “out” the MSU brass was starving for to undo it. Even though most of the money was from 2 private sources, it was one of the dumbest contracts in the history of sports, and they had major buyer’s remorse.It was a stupid contract and Tucker is stupider for doing whatever he did. MSU was right to fire him for his stupidity and because he sucks as a coach. Now.....if he was a good coach, I wouldnt fire him.
Tucker’s lawsuit against MSU is assured. His attorney has already made that clear. If “at will” and “for cause” had specific singular meanings under the law, a whole bunch of employment lawyers would be out of work, and there would be no published appellate decisions attempting to define those terms in the context of many different factual scenarios.What lawsuit ?
He was terminated for l cause
He was able to provide evidence via his attorney to retain his job .
He’s not an union employee so he’s at will
Obviously, she hasn't been invited.Also, why hasn't this woman spoken at Rape U yet where gang rapes are normal occurrences?
Phone records showed almost 40 calls between the two. many lasted a half hour or more includingIt wasn't the best idea from him to engage in that trelationship.
But, I do find it odd that she would engage in that relationship, and then be upset because her partner basically had phone sex with her? He lost $80 million and his career because he basically pleasured himself while on the phone with his girefriend? Seems a bit of an uneven punishment.
But he simply won't be allowed to question it. Nor will ANYONE in the mainstream media.
Phone records showed almost 40 calls between the two. many lasted a half hour or more including
the call where he performed his act. Not to defend him, but does she not know how to end a call ?
The info is in an article in the Athletic.
Do we know the nature of theses calls? Nope. For all we know, these calls were of a legitimate nature. Maybe she educated him on how to handle kids who were involved in some kind of assault or how to prevent them from getting involved in those situations. Then on the last call she suspected that he was slapping his meat stick? We just don’t know what happened.Phone records showed almost 40 calls between the two. many lasted a half hour or more including
the call where he performed his act. Not to defend him, but does she not know how to end a call ?
The info is in an article in the Athletic.
It’s a state specific lawTucker’s lawsuit against MSU is assured. His attorney has already made that clear. If “at will” and “for cause” had specific singular meanings under the law, a whole bunch of employment lawyers would be out of work, and there would be no published appellate decisions attempting to define those terms in the context of many different factual scenarios.
Go NOW and blow a semester?IIRC, players are free to transfer from MSU within 30 days of Tucker’s dismissal, and play at the new school at once. Should Pitt recruit anyone from MSU?
Exactly .. when you can play the rest of the season. Then enter the portal and play next year.Go NOW and blow a semester?
Oh, come on. You're not new to this kind of circus.What lawsuit ?
He was terminated for l cause
He was able to provide evidence via his attorney to retain his job .
He’s not an union employee so he’s at will
Big booster paid for it. Big booster will pay for whatever it takes so they can brush this as far under the rug as they can.Whatever the settlement is, I am certain it will be less than the buy out of his absurd 10 year contract. I have no idea what MSU was thinking with that.
They are 12-14 in conference since he was hired.
D1 football players are not regular students, they don’t have to worry about trivialities of losing credits or admission deadlines. So that’s no concern.Go NOW and blow a semester?
I'd venture to guess that none of these kids know that Narduzzi coached there unless someone tells them about it.D1 football players are not regular students, they don’t have to worry about trivialities of losing credits or admission deadlines. So that’s no concern.
The concerns are that (1) Duz would not want to ‘dick over’ (tasteless pun intended) his old buddies there by poaching their players, but REALLY that (2) no player worth a dam would want to transfer to us right now if they have other options greater than Western Michigan (I feel I can insult them since we beat them at least 50% of the time).
They’re not the problem. Duz “ethics” would be the problem. Particularly with his old buddy the “executive advisor” or whatever to the interim guyI'd venture to guess that none of these kids know that Narduzzi coached there unless someone tells them about it.
I guess? Not sure why it matters. It's not like anyone who is worth a damn is hitting the portal in late September.They’re not the problem. Duz “ethics” would be the problem. Particularly with his old buddy the “executive advisor” or whatever to the interim guy
As I said from the beginning, They won't hire him... They will look for a younger coach with a better pedigree. Narduzzi is 57 years old. Not a lot of first rate schools are going to hire him. If he wants to be successful, he needs to do it at Pitt. That means doing what he can to win games and put his stubborn ego aside and get into the 21st century...https://spartanavenue.com/2023/09/26/michigan-state-football-nightmare-head-coaching-candidates/
Guess who the #1 nightmare scenario coach is based on this article. Nobody wants him.
Looking for a head coach who is slightly above average and whose recruiting is well below average for the Power Five level? Look no further than Pat Narduzzi.
What the hell will he claim? Entrapment? LOLTucker’s lawsuit against MSU is assured. His attorney has already made that clear. If “at will” and “for cause” had specific singular meanings under the law, a whole bunch of employment lawyers would be out of work, and there would be no published appellate decisions attempting to define those terms in the context of many different factual scenarios.
Nah. These things usually hinge on contract language.What the hell will he claim? Entrapment? LOL
The guy is an absolute moron
As I said from the beginning, They won't hire him... They will look for a younger coach with a better pedigree. Narduzzi is 57 years old. Not a lot of first rate schools are going to hire him. If he wants to be successful, he needs to do it at Pitt. That means doing what he can to win games and put his stubborn ego aside and get into the 21st century...
First thing he needs to do is hire a OC with a more modern offense. Julian Dugger is a talented dual threat QB. They need to tailor the offense to his strengths.
Another article.
![]()
Power ranking 10 candidates for Michigan State football's head coaching job: Version 1.0
Ranking MSU’s potential head coaching candidates:spartanswire.usatoday.com