ADVERTISEMENT

USA Today article about Saturday's commitments

Did Craig Meyer ghost write this story? It seems negative for a good story. Kinda calls into question one of the heights and weights, says we got one 4 star and a handful of 3 stars. then writes that 3 of them are 4 star and 3 3 star in the article. Then doesnt state the other offers. Kind of a weird story.
It is a USA Today article. Journalism is garbage today and USA today is the McDonald's of papers. We're lucky they didn't misspell Pitt.
 
Did Craig Meyer ghost write this story? It seems negative for a good story. Kinda calls into question one of the heights and weights, says we got one 4 star and a handful of 3 stars. then writes that 3 of them are 4 star and 3 3 star in the article. Then doesnt state the other offers. Kind of a weird story.

Why would anyone read the PG ? I wouldnt
 
  • Like
Reactions: doubleAA's
Did Craig Meyer ghost write this story? It seems negative for a good story. Kinda calls into question one of the heights and weights, says we got one 4 star and a handful of 3 stars. then writes that 3 of them are 4 star and 3 3 star in the article. Then doesnt state the other offers. Kind of a weird story.

I think you are being to sensitive or just getting use to the negative press the last 9 years. I just read the article, it was stated the recruit probably has grown, since 2 other sources have him listed taller and heavier.
 
I think you are being to sensitive or just getting use to the negative press the last 9 years. I just read the article, it was stated the recruit probably has grown, since 2 other sources have him listed taller and heavier.

Yeah, I read it. Still a douchie thing to say. Who cares? You can list his measurables then say what teams offered. It is not being sensitive, imagine if that was your kid going to Pitt, and your kid is in a national newspaper, and that is the thing written about him. It was almost the same column written by Meyer after we got our first recruit yesterday.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT