ADVERTISEMENT

Virginia Tech Game & Other Dribbles ...

DT_PITT

Lair Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Jul 17, 2001
46,030
33,416
113
** The reason to follow sports, at least in my mind, and more importantly to follow your favorite team, is for the enjoyment of it. Tonight, I truly enjoyed my favorite team. That was a great deal of fun!

** But more than it was fun for me, and presumably other fans, it surely looked fun for our Panther players. These guys haven’t looked like they’ve been having all that much fun for a couple of games now.

** In his post-game interview, Sheldon Jeter mentioned about how he was just in a good mood today. He said he’s usually very serious and focused on the bench, but today he was laughing and having fun.

** Maybe this good mood helped Sheldon relax at little bit. And with that he scored, early and often.

** When he hit a jumper to score his 13th point near the 13 minute mark in the first half, history was already on our side. Through today, the Panthers are now 7-0 when Sheldon scores at least a dozen points.

** For most of this season, I liked the idea of Sheldon coming off the bench. However, I’m becoming more convinced it’s a luxury we can no longer afford. I’m equally convinced that the only way this team can reach their highest potential is with a greater focus on offense.

** I’m convinced of this point because I’m equally convinced this team cannot improve defensively in a meaningful way.

** That doesn’t mean our defensive effort was poor today. In fact, I thought the defensive effort was better, even if the execution wasn’t always the same.

** But when you can move the ball well enough to score 90 points with 30 assists, no one is going to be terribly worried about defense, are they?

** Interestingly, I read through some of the in-game thread, and found the posts about James Robinson to be fascinating. I say this because I thought James was actually excellent today, and kept the ball moving instead of sticking. At times, James can certainly be guilty of sticking.

** I'm also fascinated with some of the negativity, even a game that was going as well as this one. But I digress.

** Let’s return to Sheldon and what he seems to mean to this team. It’s pretty clear that his early success brought confidence to his entire team. This was a game where many of the Panthers seemed very comfortable letting it fly, even if they weren’t always hitting. Two players to whom this particularly applied were Sterling Smith and Cam Johnson.

** I loved the inbounds play where Sterling quietly walked out the three point line and no one seemed to notice and he canned the triple.

** Sheldon’s confidence also seemed to inspire Ryan Luther. The game was tied at 23 when Ryan let a three fly from the corner that found the bottom of the net. That was really the one that got the team going, and after Sterling followed with his own three, the game was completely in the Panthers’ control from then on.

** It’s now been three straight games where Ryan has had a significant positive impact on the game.

** I doubt that confidence is lacking in any part of Damon Wilson’s game, and it’s great to see him finishing two really tough plays at the basket. I’m looking forward to seeing what he turns into with more experience.

** I don’t know how much fun Mike Young had during a game when he had to get stitches in his mouth. Well, it couldn’t have too bad for him considering he scored 13 points after he returned.

** Maybe a punch in the mouth will help Mike in some way. He’s the leader of this team, and he’s the one that will have to set the tone with greater toughness.

** Obviously, the Panthers looked much tougher today than they did earlier in the week. But they are going to have to find ways to get tougher against the tougher teams.

** I’m not exactly sure what to think about the Panthers surrendering 11 threes, but only 12 twos. I’ll leave that for others to figure out.

** I’m also not exactly sure what to make of the mass exodus that happened at the Pete starting around the 6:30 mark of the second half. By the time the game ended, there were only about 5,000 left in the building. It would seem to me that more Panther fans would enjoy watching some good offensive basketball after a few rougher games.

** I know this team can be very tough to watch when they play the way they did against Clemson or NC State. But that wasn’t the case today.

** What was the case today was a very enjoyable game. Notice however, that I didn’t say impressive. Beating Va Tech at home by 19 is solid, but not impressive. It’s what we should have done, more or less.

** Beating the other Virginia at home next week would be impressive though. I believe the Panthers are capable of this, even if can’t say I’m confident they will get it done.

** But it sure would be fun! See you on Saturday for the BLACKOUT!
 
I don’t know how much fun Mike Young had during a game when he had to get stitches in his mouth. Well, it couldn’t have too bad for him considering he scored 13 points after he returned.


Mike Young in the first half: 10 minutes, 0 points, 0 rebounds, 1 smack in the mouth, 1 smack in the, ah, groin area
Mike Young in the second half: 18 minutes, 13 points, 7 rebounds

Moral of the story: Don't smack Mike Young in the mouth or in the groin?
 
Mike Young in the first half: 10 minutes, 0 points, 0 rebounds, 1 smack in the mouth, 1 smack in the, ah, groin area
Mike Young in the second half: 18 minutes, 13 points, 7 rebounds

Moral of the story: Don't smack Mike Young in the mouth or in the groin?
Hopefully, the smacks didn't happen at the same time, if you know what I mean.
 
DT, good comments as always. I DVR'd the game and started watching it around 7:00 or so. I actually caught up to the live feed with about 3:40 left in the game, so I stayed off of the boards tonight until after the game was over. I didn't read every post but I was a bit surprised to read about JRob not having a better-than-average game tonight. JRob set the tone by making the game's first shot, and ended the game with 11 dimes, 0 turnovers, and at took at least 2 charges. His assist number should have been about 3-4 more as at least that many shots were missed by his "assist target".

I will probably post my Moe-bservations tomorrow - but two I don't want to wait for are: 1) just how much better we fought for rebounds in the second half (and converted those into second chance points), and 2) how we rebuilt the lead after game was tied at 23-23 (you mentioned Luther's big 3-pointer) and then never looked back.

Unlike some of our games this year when we let big leads evaporate (ND comes to mind), tonight's Panthers kept the hammer down. It's too bad we have to wait 6 days to see the boys play again; let's hope they come out next Saturday with the same intensity and confidence
 
DT, good comments as always. I DVR'd the game and started watching it around 7:00 or so. I actually caught up to the live feed with about 3:40 left in the game, so I stayed off of the boards tonight until after the game was over. I didn't read every post but I was a bit surprised to read about JRob not having a better-than-average game tonight. JRob set the tone by making the game's first shot, and ended the game with 11 dimes, 0 turnovers, and at took at least 2 charges. His assist number should have been about 3-4 more as at least that many shots were missed by his "assist target".

I will probably post my Moe-bservations tomorrow - but two I don't want to wait for are: 1) just how much better we fought for rebounds in the second half (and converted those into second chance points), and 2) how we rebuilt the lead after game was tied at 23-23 (you mentioned Luther's big 3-pointer) and then never looked back.

Unlike some of our games this year when we let big leads evaporate (ND comes to mind), tonight's Panthers kept the hammer down. It's too bad we have to wait 6 days to see the boys play again; let's hope they come out next Saturday with the same intensity and confidence
The Robinson stuff is mostly one or two doofuses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ncpittfan
The Robinson stuff is mostly one or two doofuses.

Walking up the hill before the game, I was listening to a guy explaining to his buddy how Dixon needs to bench Robinson and play Wilson.

Of course, this same guy was going on about how playing 1-3-1 is what this team needs to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fredact
Agree with your point about focusing on the offense. Ironically, Coach Dixon cannot allow spending practice time on the defense to take away from the continued focus on playing good offense.

My contention is that the best chance for the Panthers to win is to take a higher percentage of "good" shots than the opposition. That should be this team's definition of "good defense." Some games this season we have resorted to taking lots of poor/tough/awkward shots - like the first half against NC State.

A minor point - play Sheldon Jeter, but please instruct him not to shoot 3-pointers, that is not his game. Yes it's only a possession or two per game, but that can make the difference.

Sheldon made an another interesting comment in his interview after the game. He said that his father told him that he had been rushing his shot. Whether he was or not, the advice sure helped. Nice going Sheldon's Dad!

Go Pitt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TreesHero
just how much better we fought for rebounds in the second half (and converted those into second chance points)


At one point in the first half Virginia Tech had 6 offensive and 6 defensive rebounds and Pitt had 0 offensive rebounds and 3 defensive rebounds. From that point on Virginia Tech had 5 and 15 and Pitt had 14 and 17.
 
Agree with your point about focusing on the offense. Ironically, Coach Dixon cannot allow spending practice time on the defense to take away from the continued focus on playing good offense.

My contention is that the best chance for the Panthers to win is to take a higher percentage of "good" shots than the opposition. That should be this team's definition of "good defense." Some games this season we have resorted to taking lots of poor/tough/awkward shots - like the first half against NC State.

A minor point - play Sheldon Jeter, but please instruct him not to shoot 3-pointers, that is not his game. Yes it's only a possession or two per game, but that can make the difference.

Sheldon made an another interesting comment in his interview after the game. He said that his father told him that he had been rushing his shot. Whether he was or not, the advice sure helped. Nice going Sheldon's Dad!

Go Pitt.

One of Sheldon's threes was near the end of the shot clock (about 5 seconds left) so I didn't have too much of a problem with it.
 
I've been thinking lately... maybe it would be best to just play 3 forwards, move Young to the 5, and start Jeter at the 4. Well it sure worked out tonight. It was great having such a good sixth man, but it's not the NBA you have to start your 5 best players.

Also, with Maia starting and even ANO playing we were always at a disadvantage at the 5 spot. At least with Young there it's a mismatch for most of our opponents. Not to mention we went from having 2 really good forwards in the starting lineup to 3. This is clearly more of a finesse team and I think the lineup tonight is by far the best we can make.

I really think we can still have a really good season... if we can play some defense the rest of the way. I think if this is our lineup we're gonna score points. Also we haven't really seen a Pitt team in the tourney that was more offensive minded than defensive. I think that could be interesting to see.
 
Very pleased with the game. However, I think the matchup favored us since VTech had no 6-10 or taller bigs to contend with. I am not sure this game marks some kind of turning point. We may look bad again against opponents who have that greater size inside--even if Jeter starts. We shall see. Hoping to be pleasantly surprised going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireballZ
Agree with DC. I loved the starting lineup, but when we play a team with a legit big that can score, Jeter, Young, Luther with have a tough time defensively and get in foul trouble.
Against teams that don't have standout bigs, last nights lineup works. Maybe a helping defense, guards trapping down on the big, helping our 4's playing defense on the 5's, can work, but we seem to give up even more open 3's when we do that.
 
If your not getting defensive stops with your best defensive group then you might as well get your best offensive players in there.
So goes Sheldon Jeter so goes Pitts offense
They also appeared more aggressive around the hoop on both ends with Jeter in there
Cam Johnson needs to fire it up more
Ryan Luther should be the first big off the bench , he adds something every time he's in there
Damon Wilsons best game
Pitt really would be much better if JRob could shoot better
A lot of positives with the ACC having a crazy year every win is big
Wonder if the Duke tickets are losing value
For our negative posters you should sign up for Dukes board and start fire Coach K ,why can't we recruit good players ,or our recruits are overrated threads
 
Walking up the hill before the game, I was listening to a guy explaining to his buddy how Dixon needs to bench Robinson and play Wilson.

Of course, this same guy was going on about how playing 1-3-1 is what this team needs to do.

Again, it is just people offering suggestions to issues that we have. What is wrong with that? I mean, we beat Va Tech at home. YAY! It was a nice win, it was enjoyable. But what does it mean?
 
Few points.

1) Enjoying the game for the sake of enjoying your favorite team is something that unfortunately gets lost. Sometimes that is good enough.

2) I really like Damon Wilson. What upside. Prediction, he will never lead the NCAA in Assist to TO ratio. That's okay, because he is a playmaker and looks like a guy who can and will create his own offense.

3) Ryan Luther has a higher upside than we all realize.

4) JRob was good, but he is usually good in games like this.

5) Sheldon Jeter is like the longer, more modern version of Vinnie Johnson, aka "the Microwave". He just can explode in a quick stretch like a snow squall and all of a sudden in 4-5 minutes he has 10 points.

6) Late Sunday nite games have been an ACC staple, but that is awkward time slot for fans.

7) The Zoo, another fantastic recruiting effort for the football team!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
Agree with DC. I loved the starting lineup, but when we play a team with a legit big that can score, Jeter, Young, Luther with have a tough time defensively and get in foul trouble.
Against teams that don't have standout bigs, last nights lineup works. Maybe a helping defense, guards trapping down on the big, helping our 4's playing defense on the 5's, can work, but we seem to give up even more open 3's when we do that.

More or less, we play a helping defense, but it does give up more open threes.
 
Very pleased with the game. However, I think the matchup favored us since VTech had no 6-10 or taller bigs to contend with. I am not sure this game marks some kind of turning point. We may look bad again against opponents who have that greater size inside--even if Jeter starts. We shall see. Hoping to be pleasantly surprised going forward.

I agree DC -- I don't think it's any kind of turning point either. We are going to have to find a way to look good against opponents with whom we don't match up well. I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised too.
 
I agree DC -- I don't think it's any kind of turning point either. We are going to have to find a way to look good against opponents with whom we don't match up well. I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised too.
Well, Perantes will be a test. He's really become a terrific player....hope he leaves for the NBA. Brogdon, too. I'm thinking it goes down to the wire.
 
Well, Perantes will be a test. He's really become a terrific player....hope he leaves for the NBA. Brogdon, too. I'm thinking it goes down to the wire.

I'm thinking it goes down to the wire as well -- similar to both games two years ago.

But we'll need to see if these guys have what it takes to be on the right side of the wire this time.
 
Did you ask him what his nickname was on Pantherlair?

Haha ... stopped doing that a while ago!

And to respond to Owt's comment, I suppose there's nothing wrong with people offering suggestions to problems that we have. However, personally I suppose I'm a bit overly reactive to suggestions that don't come from a place of particular knowledge. I'd make a terrible call in talk show host, although I can say that those guys too get pretty fed up with some of the suggestions offered there.

In this particular case of the man walking up the hill, I took note because he was offering this suggestions to his friend with a tone that seemed to indicate that he was an expert on the topic.
 
Well, Perantes will be a test. He's really become a terrific player....hope he leaves for the NBA. Brogdon, too. I'm thinking it goes down to the wire.

Perantes is not only a test, but a pest. I love watching him play against anyone else but us.
 
Haha ... stopped doing that a while ago!

And to respond to Owt's comment, I suppose there's nothing wrong with people offering suggestions to problems that we have. However, personally I suppose I'm a bit overly reactive to suggestions that don't come from a place of particular knowledge. I'd make a terrible call in talk show host, although I can say that those guys too get pretty fed up with some of the suggestions offered there.

In this particular case of the man walking up the hill, I took note because he was offering this suggestions to his friend with a tone that seemed to indicate that he was an expert on the topic.

DT, I know to some of you experts, it gets pedestrian and tired that fans have the audacity to question the coaching staff and want to try different things. But as I wrote also in my response, "that enjoying your team is sometimes enough", isn't also true that fans offering critiques or suggestion another form of supporting their teams? I mean, no one is trying to offer suggestions on how to suck.

I mean, our defense sucks. There seem to be no answers. Souf suggested going full on press, at least that way the layups given up maybe offset by the turnovers that might be created. The 1-3-1 if you look at it tactically, we have a fairly long team that might make that an interesting change up for teams to attack. Not sure what the harm is in fans suggesting this.

But it isn't about if the 1-3-1 would work or would not. It is about some fans having the audacity to question the coaching. And again, if we don't make the NCAA's, that is 3 of the last 5. That is sliding backwards into Ga Tech or Wake Forest areas. Something is not working. People are concerned. I just don't get why a sector of this forum gets so indignant when some fans offer critiques or suggestions? I don't.

I do understand when we were rolling, when we were #1 seeds, that negativity and complaints were mostly unfounded. My god, I hope you and others weren't so worn down by Phil's shenanigans that now no one can say anything that even hints at criticism. Because Phil is/was a punk with an agenda, he was like stink bugs on that first sunny 60 degree day when they make an appearance then go back in hiding when it is cold. But he should not be enough to discredit everyone else who is a critic.

Just some thoughts. Like I said, don't know what to take from yesterday's game. The blowouts against especially NC State and Clemson have me concerned. One positive, is Jamie putting in Jeter to start shows at least a willingness to try and find answers.
 
Very pleased with the game. However, I think the matchup favored us since VTech had no 6-10 or taller bigs to contend with. I am not sure this game marks some kind of turning point. We may look bad again against opponents who have that greater size inside--even if Jeter starts. We shall see. Hoping to be pleasantly surprised going forward.
"Everyone" was ready to play and played well which gave Dixon a chance to game plan as the game rolled out! The players played well and the coach coached well. Overall solid game!
 
DT, I know to some of you experts, it gets pedestrian and tired that fans have the audacity to question the coaching staff and want to try different things. But as I wrote also in my response, "that enjoying your team is sometimes enough", isn't also true that fans offering critiques or suggestion another form of supporting their teams? I mean, no one is trying to offer suggestions on how to suck.

I mean, our defense sucks. There seem to be no answers. Souf suggested going full on press, at least that way the layups given up maybe offset by the turnovers that might be created. The 1-3-1 if you look at it tactically, we have a fairly long team that might make that an interesting change up for teams to attack. Not sure what the harm is in fans suggesting this.

But it isn't about if the 1-3-1 would work or would not. It is about some fans having the audacity to question the coaching. And again, if we don't make the NCAA's, that is 3 of the last 5. That is sliding backwards into Ga Tech or Wake Forest areas. Something is not working. People are concerned. I just don't get why a sector of this forum gets so indignant when some fans offer critiques or suggestions? I don't.

I do understand when we were rolling, when we were #1 seeds, that negativity and complaints were mostly unfounded. My god, I hope you and others weren't so worn down by Phil's shenanigans that now no one can say anything that even hints at criticism. Because Phil is/was a punk with an agenda, he was like stink bugs on that first sunny 60 degree day when they make an appearance then go back in hiding when it is cold. But he should not be enough to discredit everyone else who is a critic.

Just some thoughts. Like I said, don't know what to take from yesterday's game. The blowouts against especially NC State and Clemson have me concerned. One positive, is Jamie putting in Jeter to start shows at least a willingness to try and find answers.
Criticism and suggestions aren't the problem. Repetitive attacks on individual players and calls for staff replacement, followed by silence after nice wins (there aren't BAD wins, IMHO.), with NO sensible solutions being offered, get pretty tiresome. Best of all are the "it's over" crap in game threads if we don't score the first 15 points......followed by nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rrig5
DT, I know to some of you experts, it gets pedestrian and tired that fans have the audacity to question the coaching staff and want to try different things. But as I wrote also in my response, "that enjoying your team is sometimes enough", isn't also true that fans offering critiques or suggestion another form of supporting their teams? I mean, no one is trying to offer suggestions on how to suck.

I mean, our defense sucks. There seem to be no answers. Souf suggested going full on press, at least that way the layups given up maybe offset by the turnovers that might be created. The 1-3-1 if you look at it tactically, we have a fairly long team that might make that an interesting change up for teams to attack. Not sure what the harm is in fans suggesting this.

But it isn't about if the 1-3-1 would work or would not. It is about some fans having the audacity to question the coaching. And again, if we don't make the NCAA's, that is 3 of the last 5. That is sliding backwards into Ga Tech or Wake Forest areas. Something is not working. People are concerned. I just don't get why a sector of this forum gets so indignant when some fans offer critiques or suggestions? I don't.

I do understand when we were rolling, when we were #1 seeds, that negativity and complaints were mostly unfounded. My god, I hope you and others weren't so worn down by Phil's shenanigans that now no one can say anything that even hints at criticism. Because Phil is/was a punk with an agenda, he was like stink bugs on that first sunny 60 degree day when they make an appearance then go back in hiding when it is cold. But he should not be enough to discredit everyone else who is a critic.

Just some thoughts. Like I said, don't know what to take from yesterday's game. The blowouts against especially NC State and Clemson have me concerned. One positive, is Jamie putting in Jeter to start shows at least a willingness to try and find answers.

Even talk show hosts often say to callers from time to time that their suggestions are ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rrig5
I was impressed by the way that Sheldon Jeter spoke in his post-game interview with Billy Hillgrove. One thing he said that caught my ear was about "spacing." He said Pitt's spacing was better against VT -- he said that spacing had been a problem in some games, where the paint area was too crowded with players to allow effective drives to the hoop. That really seemed to be the case in the first half against NC State.

I'd think that Jeter playing (vs. say Maia) would allow better spacing given Jeter's quickness.

Go Pitt.
 
DT, I know to some of you experts, it gets pedestrian and tired that fans have the audacity to question the coaching staff and want to try different things. But as I wrote also in my response, "that enjoying your team is sometimes enough", isn't also true that fans offering critiques or suggestion another form of supporting their teams? I mean, no one is trying to offer suggestions on how to suck.

I mean, our defense sucks. There seem to be no answers. Souf suggested going full on press, at least that way the layups given up maybe offset by the turnovers that might be created. The 1-3-1 if you look at it tactically, we have a fairly long team that might make that an interesting change up for teams to attack. Not sure what the harm is in fans suggesting this.

But it isn't about if the 1-3-1 would work or would not. It is about some fans having the audacity to question the coaching. And again, if we don't make the NCAA's, that is 3 of the last 5. That is sliding backwards into Ga Tech or Wake Forest areas. Something is not working. People are concerned. I just don't get why a sector of this forum gets so indignant when some fans offer critiques or suggestions? I don't.

I do understand when we were rolling, when we were #1 seeds, that negativity and complaints were mostly unfounded. My god, I hope you and others weren't so worn down by Phil's shenanigans that now no one can say anything that even hints at criticism. Because Phil is/was a punk with an agenda, he was like stink bugs on that first sunny 60 degree day when they make an appearance then go back in hiding when it is cold. But he should not be enough to discredit everyone else who is a critic.

Just some thoughts. Like I said, don't know what to take from yesterday's game. The blowouts against especially NC State and Clemson have me concerned. One positive, is Jamie putting in Jeter to start shows at least a willingness to try and find answers.
Phil = Stink Bug

Perfect analogy.
 
Even talk show hosts often say to callers from time to time that their suggestions are ridiculous.
I called Myron's show when I was 9 years old to talk about about the upcoming WWF match between Hulk Hogan and Andre the Giant. He called me kiddo 5 times, asked me if I had some homework to do and hung up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe the Panther Fan
Even talk show hosts often say to callers from time to time that their suggestions are ridiculous.

Oh trust me, you see from my posts that I would be more Mark Madden with callers than Stan Savran. I am just saying, there is a faction of people on here who seem to do nothing but try and discount any suggestions or criticisms. Which kind of makes them the Anti Phil.
 
Criticism and suggestions aren't the problem. Repetitive attacks on individual players and calls for staff replacement, followed by silence after nice wins (there aren't BAD wins, IMHO.), with NO sensible solutions being offered, get pretty tiresome. Best of all are the "it's over" crap in game threads if we don't score the first 15 points......followed by nothing.
Agree. And just going by the team we played or are playing, we fared better against VT than pretty much any other ACC team. Duke beat them badly, but all their other games were close. Take it for it's worth, we still need to beat UVA and Miami, but a near 20 point victory in the ACC is a well played game no matter how you spin it.
 
Agree. And just going by the team we played or are playing, we fared better against VT than pretty much any other ACC team. Duke beat them badly, but all their other games were close. Take it for it's worth, we still need to beat UVA and Miami, but a near 20 point victory in the ACC is a well played game no matter how you spin it.

If we go 1-2 over the next 3, I think we will be OK. But we really need at least 1 win over the next 3. We need a quality win.
 
Oh trust me, you see from my posts that I would be more Mark Madden with callers than Stan Savran. I am just saying, there is a faction of people on here who seem to do nothing but try and discount any suggestions or criticisms. Which kind of makes them the Anti Phil.

I think most of the people who "discount" are those who discount criticisms that lack facts, knowledge or perspective. There may be a few that go past that, but it's a small number, just like there is a small number on the Phil side.

And here's the thing about Phil.

I wouldn't even say that I always disagree with all of Phil's ideas. For example, I too have concerns about how much this team can accomplish.

And to say that this team hasn't beaten any very good teams this year is accurate. (Although his "cupcake" argument completely negates the FACT that all teams are scheduling cupcakes -- ESPN had a discussion about it on game day on Sat.)

Still, Phil's motive is simply to troll and therefore it makes no difference what his thoughts are. The discounters aren't trying to be trolls.

In fact, I think the only "discounter" who is really equal to Phil on the other side of the equation is Dooz3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KiwiJeff
I think most of the people who "discount" are those who discount criticisms that lack facts, knowledge or perspective. There may be a few that go past that, but it's a small number, just like there is a small number on the Phil side.

And here's the thing about Phil.

I wouldn't even say that I always disagree with all of Phil's ideas. For example, I too have concerns about how much this team can accomplish.

And to say that this team hasn't beaten any very good teams this year is accurate. (Although his "cupcake" argument completely negates the FACT that all teams are scheduling cupcakes -- ESPN had a discussion about it on game day on Sat.)

Still, Phil's motive is simply to troll and therefore it makes no difference what his thoughts are. The discounters aren't trying to be trolls.

In fact, I think the only "discounter" who is really equal to Phil on the other side of the equation is Dooz3.
I could be wrong but I remember a few years ago you and Phil used to get along and it seemed like you guys liked each other. Now when he comes on I notice you never reply to him at all. I think that gets him pissed off because he keeps starting threads mentioning you should retire lol. He wants attention obviously.
 
Agree. And just going by the team we played or are playing, we fared better against VT than pretty much any other ACC team. Duke beat them badly, but all their other games were close. Take it for it's worth, we still need to beat UVA and Miami, but a near 20 point victory in the ACC is a well played game no matter how you spin it.
The ACC is a bit schizo this year. Lots of surprises.....and UNC will get some losses before it's over. Johnson/Jackson/Paige are a terrific base, though.
 
I could be wrong but I remember a few years ago you and Phil used to get along and it seemed like you guys liked each other. Now when he comes on I notice you never reply to him at all. I think that gets him pissed off because he keeps starting threads mentioning you should retire lol. He wants attention obviously.

I don't reply to him anymore because he most often gets deleted so quickly that it seems like a waste of effort.

But he's right though ... I should retire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittPoker
The ACC is a bit schizo this year. Lots of surprises.....and UNC will get some losses before it's over. Johnson/Jackson/Paige are a terrific base, though.
Agree. Damn near impossible to go 18-0 in the ACC. I think UNC definitely has the best shot at winning the NC this year though. I think they're easily the most talented team in the country.
 
I don't reply to him anymore because he most often gets deleted so quickly that it seems like a waste of effort.

But he's right though ... I should retire.
Nah, you still have a few years of dribbles left.
 
I think why the "play 1-3-1" comment is particularly frustrating to me, is that the person making the statement has no concept of what it would take in terms of practice time to implement that. They seem to imply that if Dixon would just say to the players "hey guys, play the 1-3-1 for the first 10 minutes of the second half" that somehow it would happen.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT