ADVERTISEMENT

War Plans Shared with Reporter on Signal Chat

Saw this in a post

The part that people are missing is that they're doing official communications on Signal to avoid those communications being retained. There are Project 2025 training videos that specifically recommended this type of thing as a way to avoid subpoenas. Our government is using 3rd party software to discuss OPSEC, NOFORN, and Top Secret levels of communication in avenues that do not retain data. They can stage a total takeover of the US and there will be no evidence through any official channels.
So on top of being incompetent it’s also illegal….

Time to sack them all this country can’t survive this nonsense and frankly it’s not at all worth the risk for people serving, veterans or the American people as a whole.

Everything has weakened the United States from day one… not hyperbole… ever aspect of this Project 2025 which they denied knowledge of while “campaigning “ ( horses ass rallying more accurately) because they knew no one would rationally vote for their own destruction.
 
So on top of being incompetent it’s also illegal….

Time to sack them all this country can’t survive this nonsense and frankly it’s not at all worth the risk for people serving, veterans or the American people as a whole.

Everything has weakened the United States from day one… not hyperbole… ever aspect of this Project 2025 which they denied knowledge of while “campaigning “ ( horses ass rallying more accurately) because they knew no one would rationally vote for their own destruction.
Start the impeachment proceedings
 
  • Like
Reactions: 303vND and DruidTM
So on top of being incompetent it’s also illegal….

Time to sack them all this country can’t survive this nonsense and frankly it’s not at all worth the risk for people serving, veterans or the American people as a whole.

Everything has weakened the United States from day one… not hyperbole… ever aspect of this Project 2025 which they denied knowledge of while “campaigning “ ( horses ass rallying more accurately) because they knew no one would rationally vote for their own destruction.
What is illegal?
 
What is illegal?
I posted it above...

According to Goldberg, the use of Signal may also have violated the Espionage Act, which establishes how officials must handle information about the national defense. The app is not approved for national security use, and officials are supposed either to discuss military activity in a sensitive compartmented information facility, or SCIF, or to use approved government equipment.
 
Of course, you missed the point. You had to change the topic to avoid it.

According to everyone who has spoken, no classified information was included.
LOL...of course...what do you expect them to say?!! You're broaching on new levels of stupidity...and thought that was even impossible for you.
 
Yeah discussing in real time air strikes against Yemen is absolutely unclassified. It's why all wartime actions are streamed live for us all to see. 🤓🤪
Ratcliffe and Gabbard just testified before Congress that no classified material was discussed.

Actually, lots of wartime actions are televised.
 
I posted it above...

According to Goldberg, the use of Signal may also have violated the Espionage Act, which establishes how officials must handle information about the national defense. The app is not approved for national security use, and officials are supposed either to discuss military activity in a sensitive compartmented information facility, or SCIF, or to use approved government equipment.
Yet again, there was no classified info discussed as per everyone who has spoken, including congressional testimony this morning.
 
Well, that's just nonsense. Just as I expected from you.
Really ? Just look at the Department of Education

Can’t do that without congressional approval.. illegal… unconstitutional… and should be ignored period. It’s babbling nonsense signed off by your King.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ratking17
Really ? Just look at the Department of Education

Can’t do that without congressional approval.. illegal… unconstitutional… and should be ignored period. It’s babbling nonsense signed off by your King.
They are doing everything by the book. The DOE will exist on paper until Congress kills it. Its functions are just shifted elsewhere.

Try again.
 
Apparently, it was used correctly by the Trumpies. Despite your claim otherwise.
There is actually multiple streams outlining how it wasn't used correctly(unless you're just texting your hooker and not disclosing classified war plans).
 
Prove them wrong. Bet you can't.
Just wait...there will be more to come out. And then you'll pivot to something else.

Edit: The White House had already acknowledged — publicly and on the record — that administration officials really did discuss highly sensitive military plans using an unclassified chat application. Hegseth tried to peddle a clumsy denial anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DruidTM
Start the impeachment proceedings
Ratliff already addressed that.not illegal and completely appropriate. And it was all recorded through other channels as directed by law.

Additionally since I am the only one trying to remain objective here, the question I have is how can this info not be classified? Strikes me as odd.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BurghGuy68
They are doing everything by the book. The DOE will exist on paper until Congress kills it. Its functions are just shifted elsewhere.

Try again.
It will exist because no one is going to listen to your King.
As I've already said, that was a mistake. But it wasn't illegal.
That’s debatable and there’s no reason on earth to trust this crew to be above board at all…

It’s a little bigger than a “ mistake ” a mistake is forgetting the ketchup on King asshats steak… has he been briefed incidentally? Because he claims to know nothing… “ cOmAnDur in cHief “ Krasnov… lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 303vND
And one group used it correctly and one group didn't. Boy..those DEI hires ain't worth a chit!
That’s your biased assumption. You dont know that. You only know what they tell you. Don’t be a partisan shill.
 
So you believe these leftist streams. That I can believe.
Yep...just blame it on the left - wash, rinse, repeat. It's comedy central.

The White House had already acknowledged — publicly and on the record — that administration officials really did discuss highly sensitive military plans using an unclassified chat application. Hegseth tried to peddle a clumsy denial anyway.
 
Apparently just general competency is something only “crazy lefties” should expect…? Seeing a bunch of man children stepping on their dicks daily is the “new normal “….
 
The reporter said he left names off whose identity should not be shared due to it being sensitive info (CIA)...so are you SURE about that?
Yes that individual is not undercover. That person was a CiA official.
 
Apparently just general competency is something only “crazy lefties” should expect…? Seeing a bunch of man children stepping on their dicks daily is the “new normal “….
Daily? Come on now. You’ve only now run over to this board because you finally have something legit to cheer…errr I mean talk about. If shit was happening daily, you’d have been here all along.
 
Todays testimony.

I appreciate Goldberg attempt to protect his identity. But as Ratliff said,it didn’t have to be.
Of course it didn't have to be - the discussion didn't have to be open to the public in the first place.
 
Daily? Come on now. You’ve only now run over to this board because you finally have something legit to cheer…errr I mean talk about. If shit was happening daily, you’d have been here all along.
This is now the new Jan 6th and Charlottesville. 24/7/365 here we go, full on frontal assault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PittMan2003
Both DNI Gabbard and CIA Director Ratcliffe are telling Senators today that 'there was no classified material' shared in that Yemen attacks group chat. IF that's the case, then the Atlantic should just release everything.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT