@Syr: They score points, but give up even more. We lock them up early. W by 10-14
UNC: They score tons of points but haven't really been tested. Have a close win and close loss vs. their only two not-terrible opponents (SCar & GT who are 5-9). W by 3-10.
ND: Lots of talent, but they looked vulnerable vs. Virginia, Navy, & USC, which means we have a decent chance. We can't make big mistakes on either side of the ball. L by 3-7.
@Duke: Very good D. On O they're solid but unspectacular. First to 13 wins. W by 1-6.
Lou: 4 L's to 4 great teams, and they've been in all of them. Barely beat NCSt, though, who VT then handled. Their QB's get sacked & picked a lot. W by 6-10.
Mia: All around good O, but are winning on the back of their great turnover margin which could change. Very close to losing their last 4 (OT W vs Nebr, +4 TOV in close W vs VT). W by 6-13
UNC: They score tons of points but haven't really been tested. Have a close win and close loss vs. their only two not-terrible opponents (SCar & GT who are 5-9). W by 3-10.
ND: Lots of talent, but they looked vulnerable vs. Virginia, Navy, & USC, which means we have a decent chance. We can't make big mistakes on either side of the ball. L by 3-7.
@Duke: Very good D. On O they're solid but unspectacular. First to 13 wins. W by 1-6.
Lou: 4 L's to 4 great teams, and they've been in all of them. Barely beat NCSt, though, who VT then handled. Their QB's get sacked & picked a lot. W by 6-10.
Mia: All around good O, but are winning on the back of their great turnover margin which could change. Very close to losing their last 4 (OT W vs Nebr, +4 TOV in close W vs VT). W by 6-13