He's fine for a depth piece and depth scoring, its an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress for example. His minutes should be similar to what he played at Houston, not more than that based off his efficiency metrics. 15-17 minutes or so is fine. This should not be a full time starter playing 30 minutes per game unless he makes some major improvements, which I doubt.I liked his tape from Temple, but Vader soured me on him a bit. But I'll still take it.
He's fine for a depth piece and depth scoring, its an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress for example. His minutes should be similar to what he played at Houston, not more than that based off his efficiency metrics. 15-17 minutes or so is fine. This should not be a full time starter playing 30 minutes per game unless he makes some major improvements, which I doubt.
Comparing a bench player who got decent minutes on a number one seed team to Jeffress is quite the insult. He was 34% from 3 against B12 competition. I agree he did have a lot of non offensive games, but was also capable of going off from time to time, something Jeffress never showed flashes of doing.He's fine for a depth piece and depth scoring, its an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress for example. His minutes should be similar to what he played at Houston, not more than that based off his efficiency metrics. 15-17 minutes or so is fine. This should not be a full time starter playing 30 minutes per game unless he makes some major improvements, which I doubt.
Comparing a bench player who got decent minutes on a number one seed team to Jeffress is quite the insult.
Literally any one would be better than Jeffress offensively though. Defense yes will gave a lot, but I’m trying to think of a better offensive Pitt comparison in recent years.I was not comparing him to Jeffress. I said he is an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress off the bench. Lets not dwell on the fact that Jeffress did 2 things here at this program fairly well, defense and rebounding and was really bad and limited on offense. We are getting some decent defense with Dunn with considerable more scoring punch albeit with average efficiency and shooting statistics. Its a good depth addition.
Expecting or even wanting this guy to score 10-15 points per game at 38% / 31% shooting splits is not something you want as a full time starter trying to improve the team year over year. He provides enough scoring potential to at least be taken seriously, unlike Jeffress or Fede where no one took seriously on the offensive side of the ball.
If we get some lock down defense from him with some scoring punch, he might pair well with Cummings who provides the offensive shooting firepower.
I was hoping for a higher rated recruit. However given that Leggett will now proablyI was not comparing him to Jeffress. I said he is an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress off the bench. Lets not dwell on the fact that Jeffress did 2 things here at this program fairly well, defense and rebounding and was really bad and limited on offense. We are getting some decent defense with Dunn with considerable more scoring punch albeit with average efficiency and shooting statistics. Its a good depth addition.
Expecting or even wanting this guy to score 10-15 points per game at 38% / 31% shooting splits is not something you want as a full time starter trying to improve the team year over year. He provides enough scoring potential to at least be taken seriously, unlike Jeffress or Fede where no one took seriously on the offensive side of the ball.
If we get some lock down defense from him with some scoring punch, he might pair well with Cummings who provides the offensive shooting firepower.
I believe this is the wing shooter!Nice !
Now we need a wing shooter
I was hoping for a higher rated recruit. However given that Leggett will now proably
start, Dunn should be a backup. Did anyone really expect the performance we got from
Leggett? All ACC 6h man award, and one of the main reasons we turned things around
in league play. Coming from a program like Houston with his stats etc he should be fine
off the bench for us. If he gives us anything close to what Leggett gave us as a sub, he
would be a great fit for what we have. Now Capel needs to get us a legit shooter. Doesn't
have to be a Hinson clone, but a guard/wing who can hit threes would be perfect. Also
a PF who can give us even more on the inside, would round out this team pretty well.
Just my two cents as I see us at this point.
Assuming Leggett starts alongside Lowe, there’s an outside chance that we have three straight 6MOY winners…. pretty wild.
His highlights are impressive anyway.
It's really weird, but that seems to almost always be the case.
Strange that no one puts out lowlights.It's really weird, but that seems to almost always be the case.
Agree with this, I think Dunn instantly made our team better with what he can do. Maybe a role, but we will be better with him on board.Nice pickup. He was good enough to play 17.5 min per game on the #1 team in the country, he's good enough to play 20+ min a game here.
Watch his game, not his metrics. This is a long, athletic guard that can play.
It's really weird, but that seems to almost always be the case.
Ok, I figured out my comparison. And yes it may be message board genius worthy. The Pitt player with most similar shooting stats and clutch shooting (as demonstrated by his clutch video; before I had just watched Houston video, but I can see why Houston wanted him) is Levance Fields. Levance dominated with a 6-7 to 1 assist/TO ratio, however, was one of worst Pitt shooters by stats. But he seemed to thrive in clutch moments. 27% from 3 in 07-08 and 34% from 3 in 08-09. FT in low 70s.I was not comparing him to Jeffress. I said he is an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress off the bench. Lets not dwell on the fact that Jeffress did 2 things here at this program fairly well, defense and rebounding and was really bad and limited on offense. We are getting some decent defense with Dunn with considerable more scoring punch albeit with average efficiency and shooting statistics. Its a good depth addition.
Expecting or even wanting this guy to score 10-15 points per game at 38% / 31% shooting splits is not something you want as a full time starter trying to improve the team year over year. He provides enough scoring potential to at least be taken seriously, unlike Jeffress or Fede where no one took seriously on the offensive side of the ball.
If we get some lock down defense from him with some scoring punch, he might pair well with Cummings who provides the offensive shooting firepower.
HCJC has evolved a lot the last few years with their use of statistical metrics and analysis.I was hoping for a higher rated recruit. However given that Leggett will now proably
start, Dunn should be a backup. Did anyone really expect the performance we got from
Leggett? All ACC 6h man award, and one of the main reasons we turned things around
in league play. Coming from a program like Houston with his stats etc he should be fine
off the bench for us. If he gives us anything close to what Leggett gave us as a sub, he
would be a great fit for what we have. Now Capel needs to get us a legit shooter. Doesn't
have to be a Hinson clone, but a guard/wing who can hit threes would be perfect. Also
a PF who can give us even more on the inside, would round out this team pretty well.
Just my two cents as I see us at this point.
Any clue why his Sophomore and Junior TS% are better than his Houston numbers? It seems tempting to say the Big 12 defense is much better but his other Temple stats were weaker too.I was not comparing him to Jeffress. I said he is an upgrade over someone like a Jeffress off the bench. Lets not dwell on the fact that Jeffress did 2 things here at this program fairly well, defense and rebounding and was really bad and limited on offense. We are getting some decent defense with Dunn with considerable more scoring punch albeit with average efficiency and shooting statistics. Its a good depth addition.
Expecting or even wanting this guy to score 10-15 points per game at 38% / 31% shooting splits is not something you want as a full time starter trying to improve the team year over year. He provides enough scoring potential to at least be taken seriously, unlike Jeffress or Fede where no one took seriously on the offensive side of the ball.
If we get some lock down defense from him with some scoring punch, he might pair well with Cummings who provides the offensive shooting firepower.
Any clue why his Sophomore and Junior TS% are better than his Houston numbers? It seems tempting to say the Big 12 defense is much better but his other Temple stats were weaker too.