They used to rate Pitt recruits higher (more stars) than rivals. Now they do the opposite. No recruit with more than 2 stars.
Weird!
Weird!
What's with the star rating on TOS?
- Thread starter DC_Area_Panther
- Start date
Understand, but now it just looks stupid. The ratings over there are so low they don't even make sense. How can a Rivals 4 star with lots of big time offers be only a 2 star over there? I could understand if he were 3 stars. The discrepancy is just too dramatic to be taken seriously. Maybe they just haven't even rated some of these guys?
Which 4 star are you referring to? That is odd for a rating to be that dramatically different especially if the offers warrant a 4 star rating.
I think the stars near each player are messed up. They've had it 8 3*, 1 2* for a while which it still shows in the rating box.
Tiger--I think you are correct they are screwed up technically. The bar graph on the left shoes 8:3 stars and 1:2 star; but--when you look at the player list on the right side you see--
Ffrench = 1 star
The other 8 = 2 stars (including Flowers who Rivals has as a 4 star). I am guessing they really have them all as 3-stars except Ffrench who they probably have as a 2-star.
That makes far more sense.
Ffrench = 1 star
The other 8 = 2 stars (including Flowers who Rivals has as a 4 star). I am guessing they really have them all as 3-stars except Ffrench who they probably have as a 2-star.
That makes far more sense.
When you click on the players name, like Chase Pine (he's a 3 star) it seems they rate the stars higher!
